skip to Main Content
thehousingbubble@gmail.com

If You’re Going To Sell, Sell Now!

A report from Verde News in Arizona. “A lawsuit against the Town of Clarkdale officially came to an end this month after the town council agreed to a settlement. Kathi Raley, who had taken out a $280,000 loan to have a home built on Ashley View Drive nearly five years ago, filed her suit in 2021. She said she was defrauded by the homebuilder and neglected by the Town of Clarkdale. In July 2023, Judge Wallace granted Raley summary judgment against Beaumier’s Design & Remodel. That meant $829,600 in damages and $22,400 in attorneys fees. Raley has no expectation of seeing any of that money; according to court records, Donald Beaumier Jr. is currently in bankruptcy court in West Virginia. Now Raley and her partner are selling the lot, as is, and moving to Tucson, where they plan to buy a house already built. ‘I have come out of this trusting nobody,’ she said. ‘Buyer beware.'”

The San Francisco Examiner in California. “San Francisco’s housing market is telling two different stories in 2024, with home prices remaining low and rents nearly recovering to their pre-pandemic peaks as The City struggles to meet its state-mandated housing goals. The average home price in San Francisco hovers around $1.26 million, still about 15% below The City’s mid-2022 peak, according to Zillow data. Overall Bay Area home sales volume in 2024, while slightly above the recent 2023 low, was more than 40% below 2021 levels.”

The Miami Herald. “Two Florida lawmakers blame insurance companies — not new state law — for helping to fuel a condo crisis that has hit owners with rising fees and assessments in high-rise buildings. The crisis also has bloomed from poor planning and enforcement from condo associations, said Ernesto Cuesta, president of the Brickell Homeowners Associations, which represents nearly 50 associations.Until 2022, condo associations had the right to skip paying reserve contributions. Now, they’re being held accountable by new state law and forced to start saving in 2025 or 2026.”

“‘That’s the issue with associations nowadays. They have been neglecting their duties and responsibilities to care for the maintenance of the buildings. To blame only on what is happening to the insurance is being naive,’ Cuesta said. ‘We projected this crisis for more than two years and a half. Buildings had been abandoned for decades. It was about time that elected politicians took a position to make sure the life of people were taken care of.'”

Miami’s Community Newspapers in Florida. “The 2024 holidays are upon us and 2025 is days away. As a trusted Realtor, I am often asked ‘How is the market?’ There are a lot of residential real estate headwinds right now. Interest rates have not come down as expected, but more impactfully, insurance rates are racing to unbearable levels and homeowner association or condo maintenance fees are also rising sharply. If you have a home worth under $2M, my colleagues and I are seeing long times on market and little to no appreciation on price. In fact, some homes have already seen softening values. So, depending on area and condition, I would say if you’re going to sell, sell now!”

“If you own a condo that is older than 10 years and under $1M in value, you need to be very careful. First, the market is very slow for condos. Prices have already slid, and I expect more softening. This is precipitated by the Florida law that, beginning in January, condo associations will be required to start collecting money from unit owners to place into reserve accounts.”

The Hartford Current in Connecticut. “Hartford’s mayor is turning up the heat on some of the city’s largest landlords with apartments in allegedly deplorable conditions, referring one to the State’s Attorney’s Office for potential prosecution after the landlord reportedly failed to repair units following an August fire. According to the city, those landlords include: PAXE properties and principal Aron Puretz, of New York with 357 units. More than 50 notices of alleged violation have been issued by the city, and 13 buildings are allegedly in foreclosure or receivership tied to city code enforcement, according to Hartford Mayor Arunan Arulampalam. The city has made emergency repairs in multiple properties and filed liens to recover the cost of tenant relocations and repairs, according to Arulampalam.”

“‘To the worst landlords out there, we want to say, ‘If you don’t shape up we’re going to drive you out of the city,’ Arulampalam said, at a news conference at city hall. ‘We are going to make it hard for you to do business. When you put profits over people, we’re going to make sure those profits dry up.'”

From Bisnow. “Only 11% of the $755M in office CMBS loans that matured in September were paid off, with roughly half of the remaining debt securing extensions from special servicers. It was a paltry payoff rate even compared to the 31% rate for the year through September, according to Moody’s. And it was a sign of the times. Property owners are avoiding transacting in today’s market, instead carrying forward the year’s dominant strategy of securing short-term extensions and other loan modifications as both sponsors and lenders wait for capital conditions to improve. The widespread practice, commonly referred to as extend-and-pretend, is available today for the owners of the highest-quality assets that can afford to pay the fees to wait for better days, but time is wearing thin for everyone else. For many asset holders, that means the pretending could come to an end in 2025.”

“‘Even institutional, great household names have hit the end of their rope,’ said Glenn Grimaldi, CEO of Naftali Credit Partners and the former head of U.S. commercial real estate finance at HSBC. ‘It’s not just them, it takes two to tango. The bank is hitting the end of its rope too, it’s ready to take the asset back.’ ‘There is maybe a sign of capitulation for lenders on distressed properties where they’re saying they’re going to throw in the towel,’ said Matt Reidy, a director covering real estate at Moody’s Analytics. ‘They’re saying, ‘We can’t continue to feed this’ or we just need to take our lumps.'”

“Investing in the debt rather than the asset helps to avoid some downside risk, said Rob Gilman, who leads the accounting firm Anchin’s real estate group. The strategy differs from the popular tactic taken during the Global Financial Crisis, Gilman said, when lenders were frequently providing capital under the assumption that the asset would eventually end up in their hands, referred to at the time as loan-to-own. That new capital is necessary for most landlords to secure short-term extensions or loan modifications in today’s market, with lenders demanding more concessions from sponsors to unlock new terms. ‘The deal’s not getting done without it,’ Gilman said. ‘But on [the lender’s] end, they’re making sure that they get a preferred return, and [the loan] is being structured so that they get the first dollars out.'”

The Globe and Mail in Canada. “59 Bel-Aire Place SW, Calgary. Asking price: $3.1-million (July, 2024). Previous asking prices: $3.3-million (May, 2024); $3.7-million (October, 2023); $3.95-million (September, 2023). Selling price: $2.55-million (October, 2024). Property days on market: 397. This 44-year-old house has a unique design on a quarter-acre lot on the banks of the Elbow River, just east of the Glenmore Dam. There were a few visitors last fall, but no serious offers; those only started after the asking price was slashed from $3.95-million to $3.1-million. This fall, a new offer came in, but one with onerous conditions. Those bidders didn’t put up a fight when another buyer presented the sellers with a firm deal at $2.55-million.”

“‘There was interest in the property, but it was priced too high,’ said agent Bryon Howard. ‘There were lots of properties in that area listed for $3-, $4- and $5-million that don’t sell, or sit on the market for a year, come off the market for two or three years, and go back on.'”

The Daily Mail in the UK. “The heartbroken grandparents who discovered their ‘botched’ dream newbuild was ‘only worth £1’ claim it’s now ruining Christmas too – as loved ones refuse to visit. Dayle Dixon, 53, and Mark Lee, 59, were first-time buyers when they bought the three-bed home in Ivybridge, Devon, for £274,995 in April 2018. But far from being a place of sanctuary, they were left with a house with more than 500 issues and ‘not fit for human habitation’ – and so say they may just spend Christmas in bed. The house is riven with cracks, making laying flooring impossible, while the walls are covered in damp and mould – meaning they have to deal with damp mites in their food.”

“Ms Dayle said: ‘The first couple of years we had the tree up but we haven’t had a Christmas for five years at least now. All the fun has been taken away because nobody wants to come round when you’re sat in chaos. We loved Christmas and used to have the family over but it’ll be just us this year and if we’re at home we’ll probably be in bed because it’s just depressing. We can’t have a family meal with everyone around the table or Christmas presents on the floor because it’s wet. We’re asking for a bit of Christmas spirit from the scrooges at Barrett Homes to give us the money we deserve and let us walk away.’ Dayle, 53, says a surveyor concluded the house is worth just £1 after damp proofing issues allowed water to run under the home and wreak havoc with its structure.”

“Her and Mark, 59, are begging Barratt Homes to pay £330,000 to buy the botched property from them and heavily compensate them for the issues so the couple can leave. Dayle says they’ve agreed to meet the independent valuation price and give her £5,000 compensation but that isn’t enough as mortgage and Help to Buy repayments would leave the pair ‘homeless’. She says that upon selling the home she’d need to clear around £88,000 outstanding from her non-transferable mortgage and around £70,000 in Help to Buy repayments. Her and Mark, 59, are begging Barratt Homes to pay £330,000 to buy the botched property from them and heavily compensate them for the issues so the couple can leave.”

“‘If we accepted the offer we’d be technically homeless because once we’ve paid the mortgage off and repaid the Help to Buy fee we wouldn’t have enough money to buy another property. If we wanted to sell it privately the surveyor said we wouldn’t get anything for it because of the amount of work that needs doing. I want them to compensate us adequately for the seven years of hell. The stress, the health problems and everything we’ve lost.'”

The Herald Sun. “Barefoot Investor Scott Pape has uncovered the Aussie areas where renters are beating homeowners at the property game, as some owners cop $200k+ losses. The renowned personal finance author, columnist and television presenter zoned in on an apartment at 883 Collins St, Melbourne that was recently listed for sale in his latest column. The building features an indoor heated pool, gym, a resident’s lounge and even a yoga room. So, 10 years ago, the sellers snapped up the apartment up for $860,000.”

“But as Pape pointed out in his column, the apartment had just gone under offer with a $630,000-$650,000 price guide — a whopping $210,000 loss at least for the owner. Pape added that the loss was before inflation, body corporate fees, council rates, land tax, maintenance, agent’s selling commission, and 10 years of interest on the home loan were factored in. ‘This is not an isolated case,’ he said. ‘Research house CoreLogic has identified 65 areas (mainly in inner-city Sydney and Melbourne) where prices today are still below the record highs from the 2010s.'”

“The barefoot investor said the real winner in this scenario was the renter. ‘They’ve enjoyed 10 years of downward dogging in the yoga room and paddling about in that fancy heated pool, plus they’ve even had a plumber on speed dial to unclog the dunny,’ he said.”

“The data revealed there were 14 suburbs across Melbourne where unit prices were typically lower today than in the property market’s peak of 2010, and 51 areas in Sydney. Unit values ranged from 0.3 per cent to 18.4 per cent less than 14 years ago, with Epping in Sydney topping the list for the biggest decline. East Melbourne unit owners were the worst off in Victoria’s capital, with values down 17.2 per cent from 2010s peak. It comes as Aussie and global personalities are being forced to slash their price guides on their homes as they sit on the market for days, months and even years.”

This Post Has 81 Comments
  1. ‘Investing in the debt rather than the asset helps to avoid some downside risk…The strategy differs from the popular tactic taken during the Global Financial Crisis, Gilman said, when lenders were frequently providing capital under the assumption that the asset would eventually end up in their hands, referred to at the time as loan-to-own’

    It is different this time.

    ‘That new capital is necessary for most landlords to secure short-term extensions or loan modifications in today’s market, with lenders demanding more concessions from sponsors to unlock new terms. ‘The deal’s not getting done without it,’ Gilman said. ‘But on [the lender’s] end, they’re making sure that they get a preferred return, and [the loan] is being structured so that they get the first dollars out’

    Gosh Rob, I wonder how many FBs’ are going to throw good money after bad?

  2. ‘There were a few visitors last fall, but no serious offers; those only started after the asking price was slashed from $3.95-million to $3.1-million. This fall, a new offer came in, but one with onerous conditions. Those bidders didn’t put up a fight when another buyer presented the sellers with a firm deal at $2.55-million’

    The title of the Globe and Mail article:

    ‘Low ball bids wear down sellers of Calgary house’

    1. “Bids Reflecting Current Market Value Disabuse Greedhead Sellers of Their Delusional Wish Price.”

      There, fixed it for ya.

  3. ‘I have come out of this trusting nobody,’ she said. ‘Buyer beware.’”

    In a time of universal fraud, aided and abetted by gub’mint at every level, if you don’t hold it, you don’t own it.

  4. “‘That’s the issue with associations nowadays. They have been neglecting their duties and responsibilities to care for the maintenance of the buildings.

    Taxpayers are under no obligation to come to the aid of condo residents who shirked their collective responsibilities for decades.

    1. and profited mightily from it. “oh look how cheap it is to live in my condo vs your house” yeah, cuz you aren’t paying your bills.

  5. As a trusted Realtor, I am often asked ‘How is the market?’

    1. Realtors are liars

    2. Anyone who trusts the NAR – an industry of dissemblers – is an imbecile

    3. The data tells its own story, so don’t expect the truth from lying realtors or the REIC shill “experts” cited in the garbage legacy media

  6. “Only 11% of the $755M in office CMBS loans that matured in September were paid off, with roughly half of the remaining debt securing extensions from special servicers.

    But…but…Paul Krugman’s muh strongest economy ever!

  7. The bank is hitting the end of its rope too, it’s ready to take the asset back.’ ‘

    CRE that goes under the auctioneer’s hammer is going to see an epic wipeout of Yellen Bux “value” as true price discovery asserts itself. The lenders, private equity locusts, & pension funds holding such toxic waste collateral on their books are in for a “Deliverance”-style reaming in 2025. Sorry, BlackRock Jay, but you’re not going to be able to print this away.

  8. We’re asking for a bit of Christmas spirit from the scrooges at Barrett Homes to give us the money we deserve and let us walk away.’

    Dream on, FBs. You screwed the pooch on this one. It could be that the whole point of your existences is to serve as a warning to others – caveat emptor. The days of high-trust societies in the Western nations are over.

  9. I want them to compensate us adequately for the seven years of hell. The stress, the health problems and everything we’ve lost.’”

    If stupid didn’t hurt, fools would never learn. Anyone with access to the internet has no excuse for not knowing how shoddily designed and built British newbuild shacks are.

  10. Cry it out, bubbleonians. UnitedHealthCare & NVIDIA are among the high-flying stocks crashing down to earth as the long-deferred financial reckoning day slouches closer. Heath insurers are going to see their “shareholder value” decimated as the peasant revolt against these rapacious swindlers continues to gain force.

    https://www.marketwatch.com/data-news/dow-s-267-point-fall-led-by-losses-in-unitedhealth-nvidia-corp-shares-20cf5501-c67dcca955dc?mod=mw_latestnews

      1. “A king has died, a country has fallen”……Trump is the closest thing to a King the USA has had ,since George Washington…..IIf they manage to get him ,on the third try, the Deep state will try to off us all…..

        1. I’m curious as to what sort of conversations 47 has had with JD Vance. Vance doesn’t have a prayer of matching 47’s charisma; after all, who does? But if something happens — and let’s face it, 78 is 78 — we can only hope that Vance pledged to at least DO the same things 47 is planning to do.

          1. If anything, I would expect Vance to be even more conservative than DJT. Then again, many thought the same of church going, “born again” Mike Pence.

  11. [People are not only stupid, they also possess short memories.]

    Newsweek Claims U.S. Cities Would be Underwater by 2050, Forgets the Same Predictions Were Made for 2000 and 2020.

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/12/16/newsweek-claims-u-s-cities-would-be-underwater-by-2050-forgets-the-same-predictions-were-made-for-2000-and-2020/

    A recent article in Newsweek, titled “Map Shows US Cities That Could Be Underwater in 2050,” claims that a number of major cities will be submerged beneath rising seas by 2050 if humans don’t stop climate change. This is false, as false as when the same claims were made by multiple media outlets repeatedly over the preceding decades leading up to 2000 and 2020. None of those cities is even close to being “underwater,” or even having the coastal waters lapping at their streets, parking lots or buildings.

    Newsweek points to data and a map produced by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA):

    A map shows the growing threat to coastal cities across the Northeast United States due to rising sea levels.

    According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)’s latest projections, sea levels along the U.S. coastlines are projected to rise, on average, around 10 to 12 inches by 2050.

    Many communities along the Atlantic, Gulf, and Pacific coasts face significant risks of partial inundation in the future if current trends continue and mitigation efforts are not intensified.

    NOAA’s Sea Level Rise Viewer shows which cities may be impacted along each coast, with dark blue areas indicating significant projected sea level rises.

    Newsweek cites the map below to provide an image reflecting the alarming projections:

    [A map appears here …]

    Newsweek is apparently forgetting these same areas were predicted to be underwater by 2000 and 2020.

    This narrative is not new; mainstream media outlets have, for decades, issued similar alarming forecasts, often with timelines that have come and gone without the predicted catastrophes materializing.

    In the late 20th century, numerous media reports warned that major U.S. cities would be underwater by the year 2000 due to rising sea levels. For example, a 1989 Associated Press article reported a United Nations official warning that entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by the year 2000 due to rising sea levels if global warming was not addressed.

    Similarly, in 2012, PBS published an interactive map projecting that certain U.S. cities and counties could experience flooding by 2020 or 2050 due to global warming-induced storm surges. Like in the Chicken Little fairy tale, the media’s past warnings have repeatedly proven false.

    These past projections were based on climate models and assumptions that, in hindsight, grossly overestimated the rate of sea-level rise and underestimated the resilience and adaptability of human societies. The current projections are grounded in the same flawed climate models that overstated the rate of sea level rise in the past.

    NOAA claims sea levels have been rising at an approximate rate of about 1.2 inches per decade globally since 1993. Translating to approximately a foot over a century, this rate of change will put none of the cities discussed in Newsweek’s article underwater by 2050. Based on this rate of rise, societies have ample time to adapt.

    Moreover, localized factors such as land subsidence, tectonic activity, wetlands conversion, and groundwater extraction play significant roles in regional sea-level changes, complicating blanket predictions.

    The media’s penchant for sensationalism often leads to the amplification of worst-case scenarios, lacking support in empirical data. For instance, a Climate Realism article critiques CBS News for suggesting that New York City is on the brink of being flooded by sea-level rise, pointing out that such claims are not substantiated by current trends or historical data.

    Human societies have historically demonstrated remarkable adaptive changes. Technological advancements and proactive urban planning have enabled coastal cities to implement effective mitigation strategies against sea-level rise. For example, the Netherlands has successfully managed sea levels for centuries through an extensive system of dikes and pumps, showcasing human ingenuity in the face of natural challenges.

    While it is prudent to acknowledge and prepare for environmental changes, it is equally important to critically assess the data and avoid hyping unrealistic claims, stoking fear where none is warranted. Predictions of imminent, catastrophic sea-level rise leading to submerged cities have repeatedly failed to materialize, underscoring the necessity for a balanced perspective that considers both scientific evidence and historical context.

    Newsweek’s recent article warning of submerged U.S. cities by 2050 is yet another example of alarmist reporting that prioritizes sensationalism over substance. By neglecting to critically assess historical data, current trends, and the track record of similar failed predictions, the outlet has done its readers—and the broader conversation on climate issues—a great disservice.

    Responsible journalism requires more than repackaging doomsday scenarios; it demands rigorous fact-checking and a willingness to present a balanced view of the evidence. By failing to meet these standards, Newsweek not only erodes public trust but also diminishes the legitimacy of meaningful environmental discussions. Readers deserve better than recycled, unfounded predictions—they deserve facts. Until outlets like Newsweek prioritize accuracy over hype, they will remain complicit in the spread of misinformation masquerading as science.

  12. Are the Years of Madness Ending?

    https://amgreatness.com/2024/12/16/are-the-years-of-madness-ending/

    The welcomed counterrevolution is one of restoration. No one knows quite what is ahead, but all know that it is at least better already than the current nightmare.

    By Victor Davis Hanson

    December 16, 2024

    Never in U.S. history has a president-elect been welcomed as the real president before his January 20 inauguration. And never has the incumbent president so willingly surrendered his last two months in office and all but abdicated—to the relief of his nation and the rest of the world.

    One reason so many are welcoming Trump’s return is the universally desperate hope that his election spelled an end to a collective madness at home and its ripples abroad during the last four years. And why not?

    Nations overseas had never quite witnessed anything like the lethal August 2021 American flight from Afghanistan. That utter humiliation and impotence of the U.S. military likely signaled to Russia there would be no consequences if it invaded Ukraine—and it did; to Iran that it could now unleash Hamas and Hezbollah on Israel—and it did; and to China that it could daily threaten Taiwan and send a spy balloon across the United States with impunity—and it did.

    The result was the current global chaos perhaps not seen since the late 1930s when a confused United States was similarly a bystander to the rise of bellicose regimes and wars. The Biden administration shrugged that the Red Sea, the Black Sea, the South China Sea, the Straits of Hormuz, and the Eastern Mediterranean Sea all became dangerous to the U.S. Navy and unsafe to world shipping.

    A disparate group of nuclear and near-nuclear powers—Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran—are either at war with Western allies or threatening war with them. Their confidence was predicated on the assumption that the U.S. after 2020 was engaged in a Maoist-like cultural revolution that warred on its own security, energy, military, universities, and social unity—and would continue with a second Biden term.

    The Biden-era cultural revolution has done great damage to the United States. The U.S. border was systematically and deliberately destroyed to allow some 10-12 million illegal entrants to pour into the U.S. without legality or background checks. Never has an outgoing administration spitefully sold taxpayer-purchased border wall material for pennies on the dollar—rather than see it used for the purposes for which it was purchased.

    Never had the U.S. experienced such an immigrant surge. And never had more than 50 million, and over 15 percent of the resident American population been foreign-born.

    Why did Biden and Alejandro Mayorkas erase the border? What madness and hate drove them to dismantle federal immigration law? Was it sheer nihilism? Or a desperate but calculated effort to alter American demography for political purposes?

    For four years, the public, elected officials, and pundits have all warned that Joe Biden was dangerously cognitively challenged and indeed completely unfit to fulfill the duties of the presidency.

    A long-suffering nation winced as Biden slurred his words, spoke in unintelligible sound bites, stood frozen and mute, screamed at and libeled half the country, tripped, fell, wandered aimlessly, became bewildered, and more or less proved a global embarrassment. All knew Biden was not able to run the country; yet none knew exactly who was actually in charge of America in his stead. The Obamas? Leftists like Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, the Squad, Jill Biden, and the Biden staff?

    Our allies worried that the usually resilient American president was now all but demented. Our enemies enjoyed these leaderless years of opportunity. And the left serially misled the public that the decrepit Biden, whom they feared in private was senile, was “dynamic,” “energic,” and “fit as a fiddle.”

    Never has a president so deserved to be removed by the 25th Amendment or through impeachment and conviction. And never has even his inner circle finally but silently agreed as they left office, the very enablers who had done their political best to mask his dementia for four long years.

    Rarely have the FBI, the CIA, the IRS, the Department of Justice, and the Pentagon become weaponized and so flagrantly and with impunity broken the law, abandoned their mission statements, and served political agendas rather than the American people. Not since the J. Edgar Hoover era has the FBI hierarchy serially lied under oath, stonewalled Congress, forged a court affidavit, or partnered with the media to suppress the news. Has the FBI ever raided an ex-president’s home, spied on parents at school board meetings, monitored Catholics, or tried to terrify and harass pro-life activists?

    Never has the justice system, from local to state to national jurisdictions, so systematically and coordinately, sought to bankrupt, render inert, and jail an ex-president and current presidential candidate.

    Never has a presidential family so brazenly profited by selling its influence to foreign interests. Never has it used the powers of the FBI and DOJ to cover up its crimes and to ensure the family filial bagman would be for years exempted by the DOJ and later pardoned by the president himself, the father of the family miscreant and privy to the family syndicate’s illegal activities.

    Seldom has a president and his administration sought to fuel a veritable cultural revolution to change the fabric of the nation by institutionalizing a third, transexual gender, violating civil rights law, and systematically admitting, hiring, and promoting Americans on the basis of their race and gender.

    Never since the Civil War era had local and state insurrectionist governments established 600 nullification zones, in which they vowed to break federal law and consider it null and void within their jurisdictions. Never have rioters looted, burned, killed, assaulted, and occupied large swaths of cities for over 120 days, and largely with impunity.

    Never had the U.S. Treasury borrowed so much money so quickly and owed $37 in national debt—and been so intent on borrowing continuously nearly $2 trillion a year in annual deficits.

    Never has a political party sought to systematically violate long-standing traditions, customs, and often the law itself to destroy a political opponent: hiring a foreign national to spread smears among the media and bureaucracies, impeaching a president twice, trying an ex-president in the Senate, seeking to remove a presidential candidate from 16 state ballots, using five different judicial jurisdictions to try an ex-president, and serially so defaming a candidate and ex-president as a dictator, fascist, and Nazi to create a climate that encouraged two near-miss assassination attempts on him.

    In sum, for the last four years, the world has watched aghast as the United States lost its collective mind and became a radical Jacobin revolutionary society.

    So why is there not a sense of almost ecstatic relief, not just among conservatives but even among Democrats, that the years of darkness and madness are ending?

    The global public believes that the United States will again become lawful, have a secure border, return as a beacon of free-market economics, protect its allies, deter its enemies, win over its neutrals, return to the rule of law, restore the professionalism and prestige of its government agencies, check predatory nations abroad with a new deterrent military, and prepare to lead the world in energy production, exploration of space, and scientific and technology development.

    Summed up, the welcomed counterrevolution is one of restoration—to dream again that nothing is impossible, and the dreary age of stasis, envy, cynicism, and nihilism is ending, replaced again by a world without limits. No one knows quite what is ahead, but all know that it is at least better already than the current nightmare.

    1. “Why did Biden and Alejandro Mayorkas erase the border? What madness and hate drove them to dismantle federal immigration law? Was it sheer nihilism? Or a desperate but calculated effort to alter American demography for political purposes?”

      You are being replaced.

  13. As Canadians watched a day of considerable political turmoil for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his government given the sudden departure of Chrystia Freeland on Monday, it appears that U.S. president-elect Donald Trump was also watching it unfold.

    “The Great State of Canada is stunned as the Finance Minister resigns, or was fired, from her position by Governor Justin Trudeau,” Trump said in a Truth Social post late Monday night.

    “Her behavior was totally toxic, and not at all conducive to making deals which are good for the very unhappy citizens of Canada,” Trump continued, ending his post with: “She will not be missed!!!”

    https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/she-will-not-be-missed-trump-on-freeland-s-departure-from-trudeau-s-government-1.7148133

  14. Trudeau considering his options as leader after Freeland quits cabinet, sources say

    7:46 p.m. EST: Heckler yells at Trudeau

    As Trudeau was seen entering his motorcade, a heckler can be heard yelling at the prime minister.

    “You failed Canada, you ruined our country. You’re done. Walk away. You don’t have an ounce of your father’s integrity,” he shouted.

    “Have a good night, sir,” Trudeau replied to him.

    https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/trudeau-considering-his-options-as-leader-after-freeland-quits-cabinet-sources-say-1.7146952

    1. As long as there isn’t a no confidence vote in Parliament, I think he will try to hang on until the the election next year. That said, I think there will be a no confidence vote.

      1. Prime Minister Peoplekind will definitely try to hang on. He’s that brainwashed about his own greatness.

        Opposition leader Pierre Poilievre, when asked about 47 and the potential tariffs, puts on a grim and serious face and insists that he is for Canada First. It’s a huge contrast to Pierre’s smug and cocky demeaner when he’s ditching on PM Peoplekind. I think Pierre genuinely fears 47.

  15. ‘We’re not united’: Liberal caucus meets, as PM Trudeau faces fresh calls to resign in light of Freeland’s departure

    The federal Liberals called an emergency caucus meeting Monday night, as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau faced renewed calls from some members of his party to resign.

    Liberal MPs from across the country convened in a room on Parliament Hill, as politicians and political observers absorbed the shockwaves of Chrystia Freeland’s surprise resignation and release of a scathing letter to the prime minister.

    Losing his deputy and the chaotic rollout of his government’s fall economic statement has, as a result, revived questions about the viability of the embattled prime minister’s continued leadership.

    Ontario Liberal MP James Maloney told reporters that the prime minister does still have the confidence of caucus, while Ontario Liberal MP Chad Collins said that’s not the case.

    “I’m not going to breach confidentiality in terms of what happened in caucus, but I can say we’re not united,” he said. “There’s still a number of our members who feel we need a change in leadership. I’m one of those.”

    “We fear what a ‘make Canada great again’ agenda from Mr. Poilievre means to our constituents, and I think the only path forward for us is to choose a new leader, and to present a new plan to Canadians with a different vision,” he said.

    https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/we-re-not-united-liberal-caucus-meets-as-pm-trudeau-faces-fresh-calls-to-resign-in-light-of-freeland-s-departure-1.7147577

    1. “We fear what a ‘make Canada great again’ agenda from Mr. Poilievre means to our constituents, and I think the only path forward for us is to choose a new leader, and to present a new plan to Canadians with a different vision,” he said.

      They want him to resign so they can elect a new, more palatable PM as they try to salvage their Liberal Party rule. But if there is a vote of no confidence then there will be an early election, meaning Poilievre would be the new PM. Lil Fidel knows this, and he will dare them to vote him out.

  16. Freeland finally says what Trudeau needs to hear as she exits cabinet

    It took Chrystia Freeland’s exit letter for the former federal finance minister to say what business leaders, and a vast chunk of the population, have long wanted to hear her tell Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

    It’s time to get serious, said Ms. Freeland as she quit the federal cabinet on Monday, after Mr. Trudeau told her on Friday he planned to move her out of the Finance Department. Time to “recognize the gravity of the moment” by partnering with premiers to face the existential threat posed by U.S. president-elect Donald Trump’s planned tariffs. Time to deal with persistent productivity problems.

    Enough with what Ms. Freeland rightly described as “costly political gimmicks,” like bribe-us-with-our own-money cheques for $250 and a two-month GST holiday on booze. Enough with working flat out to keep Mr. Trudeau in power, rather than focusing on what matters to Canadians.

    “Inevitably, our time in government will come to an end,” Ms. Freeland said, openly acknowledging what polls have been saying for over a year. “But how we deal with the threat our country currently faces will define us for a generation, and perhaps longer.”

    This refreshing candor begs a question: Where was this speak-truth-to-power version of Ms. Freeland in her five years as deputy prime minister and over four years at Finance?

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/commentary/article-freeland-finally-says-what-trudeau-needs-to-hear-as-she-exits-cabinet/

    1. “Inevitably, our time in government will come to an end,” Ms. Freeland said, openly acknowledging what polls have been saying for over a year.

      By next October at the latest. As to why Fidelito hasn’t thrown in the towel yet, perhaps his WEF masters have some tasks for him to complete before. Or maybe his ego is so big that he just won’t resign.

      One thing that is clear: the Liberal Party is done with him. But he needs to resign to avoid an early election, which Poilievre and the Conservatives will easily win.

  17. Yes, the federal deficit is bigger than it should be. That’s not what should worry you. The government is not out of money. Not even close. But it is plumb out of ideas.

    Is the country bankrupt? No. But this government is spent.

    The cupboard is bare. Not the fiscal cupboard. The intellectual larder.

    If it were necessary, Canada could run considerably larger deficits – I’m not recommending it, I’m just pointing out that, in the event of a fire, we’ve got water in the hose. Another pandemic? Global depression? World war? World trade war? If it’s truly necessary to spend and borrow more, and if the government has good ideas for all that extra spending, then have at it.

    But that’s not where we are.

    Financial bankruptcy may await this country in some distant future, but long before that we’ve already hit intellectual bankruptcy – the point at which a government, having run out of higher purpose, has worked its way down to the very bottom of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, leaving it chasing after mere survival.

    That’s where we are.

    I mistakenly believed the Trudeau government had plumbed the depths of spending incoherence when it tried to buy senior votes by promising those 75 years of age and over a 10-per-cent bonus on their Old Age Security. Since 2022, billions of extra borrowed dollars a year have gone to people who for the most part are nowhere close to living in poverty.

    Earlier this year, the Bloc Québécois pushed for the OAS bonus to be extended to those aged 65 to 74. Of course they did. This is what our politics has come to.

    But the Trudeau government is now in its bunker phase. It’s in a deep crouch, not against this world of problems, but against its own lack of popularity, and even against itself. Something has to give. Something has to change.

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/commentary/article-the-country-isnt-bankrupt-but-the-trudeau-government-is-completely/

    1. Yes, the federal deficit is bigger than it should be. That’s not what should worry you. The government is not out of money.

      Hmm … when one runs deficits and has to borrow to pay the bills, I would say that one has run out of money.

  18. LILLEY: Justin Trudeau, your time is up, you need to leave now

    Justin Trudeau, your time is up. For the good of your party, the good of your country, the good of the Canadian people, it’s time to leave.

    Quite frankly, your time has been up for a long time now, you’ve just refused to listen. The Canadian people have made it clear that they are done with you leading the country.

    Chrystia Freeland’s decision to resign as finance minister, and to upbraid you and your policies on the way out the door, is just the latest sign that you have overstayed your welcome. There are now reportedly 60 Liberal MPs calling on you to step down, joining millions of Canadians who feel the same way.

    You have ignored the public polling, you have defied those in your own party, some of your own advisors and others who have told you to go graciously.

    Rather than leave graciously, you have clung to power in the false belief that you are uniquely positioned to save Canada. Your messianic complex — where you view yourself as the only person who can rescue Canada from the problems our country faces — is clearly clouding what little judgment you have left.

    The most recent public polls have your party tied with the NDP, a fall from grace that should be an embarrassment for any political leader.

    Ipsos puts Pierre Poilievre and the Conservatives at 44% voter support, that is more than the 21% your Liberal Party is receiving even after combining it with the 21% supporting Jagmeet Singh and the NDP. Your support among women, once one of your strongest voting blocs is now down to 20%, that’s half of the 40% of women who say they will back Poilievre and the Conservatives.

    Support for you and your party in British Columbia, a province once key to your electoral success, is down at 15%. In fortress Quebec, your Liberal Party is polling at 24%, behind the Conservatives at 25% and the Bloc Quebecois at 32%.

    Just 14% of voters aged 18-34 say they will support you in the next election, while 42% of this same age bracket say they will support Poilievre.

    You and your government are weak, wounded and ineffective. At a time when we need strong national leadership, you are unable to provide it.

    This is another reason that you should step down or call an election as soon as possible.

    President-elect Donald Trump is threatening Canada with 25% tariffs, a fact that requires a strong and capable leader. You are not capable, and you are definitely not strong at this point — a fact that is not lost on Trump or his supporters, who continue to ridicule you in public.

    Here at home, you preside over a government that has not been able to move its agenda through the House of Commons due to a scandal. How bad are the documents in the Green Slush Fund Scandal that you allowed the House to focus only on that issue for the entire fall sitting rather than release the documents, as the Speakers and the Commons ordered, so that you could move government bills?

    You have driven Canada’s finances into the ground.

    Long gone is your promise of three small deficits of $10 billion. We now have structural deficits that will take years to tackle once a new and fiscally responsible government is back in charge.

    This year, we are spending more on debt service charges than the federal government spends on health care. Debt service charges are more than double what we spend on our military.

    Canadians are struggling under higher costs of living than we have seen in decades. Food prices are up 25% over where they were three years ago, rents have doubled during your time in office, and the dream of home ownershipp has evaporated.

    Crime is up, especially violent crime, and your justice reforms have turned our court system into a revolving door that releases repeat violent offenders as quickly as police arrest them.

    It’s shocking that in the face of this, you are still hanging on, convinced that voters will reward you with another government.

    They won’t; it’s not about to happen.

    What is shocking is that 21% of the population would still vote for you despite your abysmal record.

    As you head into the Christmas break, Mr. Trudeau, do us all a favour. Take some time to reflect on the facts laid out above, and then devise a plan to step down.

    The sooner, the better.

    https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/freeland-resigns-smacks-trudeau-around-on-the-way-out

  19. Medically supervised injecting facility ‘a leap of faith’ for local community

    It’s the only building in Ireland where you will have to show you have illegal drugs in order to get in.

    Those with the drugs are breaking the law outside the building, but once they step inside — they are not.

    This is the twilight zone that the country’s first ever medically supervised injecting centre will operate in when it starts this week.

    “When a person comes in, they’ll have to present the drugs they have, they can’t come in without the drugs,” the CEO of Merchants Quay Ireland, Eddie Mullins, says.

    But outside, the laws of the land remain.

    “There is no change to the legislation outside,” Mr Mullins says.

    The law is still the law, it is still illegal to carry drugs

    There had been discussion in previous years that more clarity would be needed — or, at least, desired — on how gardaí were to police the laws outside the centre.

    However, that clarity does not appear to have been hammered out.

    “I suppose we have an enduring relationship with the guards,” Mr Mullins says.

    “They have great knowledge and understanding of the clients, and they’re not targeting vulnerable people.

    “They’re trying to support them, but it will be a challenge for the guards because the law is the law.”

    One of the difficulties is that drug trends have changed, and crack cocaine is a very big problem

    “For services like Merchants Quay, crack is the most consumed drug at the moment, no question, and [the new centre] can’t facilitate smoking — this is just an injection centre,” Mr Mullins says.

    Figures from their needle exchange/crack pipe service illustrate the growth in crack use, with the number of crack pipe kits given out rising from 11,204 in 2020 to 18,997 in 2024.

    “We would now be saying that we need a facility that provides an opportunity for people who take other drugs, who are smoking drugs,” Mr Mullins says.

    “We have looked at Lisbon as a good example. It started as a supervised injection facility, and now it is a consumption and supervised injection facility. They run side by side. You can’t do both in the one room. So, in Lisbon, one is the injection and the other two are consumption rooms [for smoking drugs].”

    https://www.msn.com/en-ie/public-safety-and-emergencies/health-and-safety-alerts/medically-supervised-injecting-facility-a-leap-of-faith-for-dublin-community/ar-AA1vYZ1y

  20. Victoria Police to be given broader powers to remove masks in protest clampdown

    The Victorian government has unveiled broad plans to crack down on protester rights and bolster social cohesion, citing a rise in anti-Semitic incidents across the state.

    Premier Jacinta Allan said recent discussions with Victoria’s Jewish community in the wake of the recent suspected terror attack on the Adass Israel Synagogue had informed the move.

    A separate set of measures were also announced by Ms Allan to deliver greater powers to police when responding to public protests.

    Under the changes, the government would introduce its own state ban on protester use of terror organisation flags, as well as face masks and balaclavas.

    While acknowledging not all protesters using masks were anti-Semitic, Ms Allan said face coverings had been used by bad actors at protests.

    “We know they are being used to conceal identities, shield agitators from crowd control measures,” Ms Allan said. “Face masks aren’t a free pass to break the law.”

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-12-17/victoria-protest-laws-changes-religion-worship/104734560

  21. ** “The 2024 holidays are upon us and 2025 is days away. As a trusted Realtor, I am often asked ‘ how is the market?”

    “trusted Realtor”!? TRUSTED REALTOR . . . !?!?!?
    aaaHaHAHAHAHAHA !!!
    oh man, I’m laughing so hard.
    cantbreathe.
    trusted . . . realtor . . . HAHAHHAHHAHHA …. holy cow . . .
    oh please, Saint George Floyd . . . helpme breathe .. .
    helpmeGeorge . .
    I’ve fallen off the couch & cant . . .
    get . .
    up

  22. As Trump threatens mass deportations, Central America braces for an influx of vulnerable migrants

    SAN PEDRO SULA, Honduras (AP) — As dozens of deported migrants pack into a sweltering airport facility in San Pedro Sula, Norma sits under fluorescent lights clutching a foam cup of coffee and a small plate of eggs – all that was waiting for her in Honduras.

    Norma, who requested anonymity out of concern for her safety, spent her life savings of $10,000 on a one-way trip north at the end of October with her daughter and granddaughter.

    But after her asylum petitions to the U.S. were rejected, they were loaded onto a deportation flight. Now, she’s back in Honduras within reach of the same gang, stuck in a cycle of violence and economic precarity that haunts deportees like her.

    Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador, which have the largest number of people living illegally in the U.S., after Mexico, could be among the first and most heavily impacted by mass deportations, said Jason Houser, former Immigration & Customs Enforcement chief of staff in the Biden administration.

    Migrants and networks aiding deportees in those Northern Triangle countries worry their return could thrust them into even deeper economic and humanitarian crises, fueling migration down the line.

    “We don’t have the capacity” to take so many people, said Antonio García, Honduras’ deputy foreign minister. “There’s very little here for deportees.” People who return, he said, “are the last to be taken care of.”

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/as-trump-threatens-mass-deportations-central-america-braces-for-an-influx-of-vulnerable-migrants/ar-AA1vVipg

    1. Norma, who requested anonymity out of concern for her safety, spent her life savings of $10,000 on a one-way trip north at the end of October with her daughter and granddaughter.

      So, she had more savings than the typical American. Clearly she thought it was a giid investment and she would make it back many times over once she reached El Norte.

    2. We don’t have the capacity” to take so many people, said Antonio García, Honduras’ deputy foreign minister.

      Uh, dude, they’re your people, not ours. They were in your country to begin with.

      These jerks are basically admitting that this movement of people out of their countries into ours was partially orchestrated by their own governments. They see us as an escape valve for their corruption and failures.

      1. Are they maybe taking in even more migrants from South America? Those Central American countries are pretty small. That said, no, I don’t think that those countries could even take back their illegals immigrants from years ago. Wouldn’t that double their current populations?

        Jan 20th can’t get here soon enough. I think once Homan starts cooking, Congress will stop grandstanding about “comprehensive” reform and settle for making a deal for the Dreamers.

        1. I think Homan will dump some of the south Americans in Mexico (say the Venezuelans) and let Sheinbaum deal with them. She will of course quietly send them all the way home, possibly with some US financial help.

          Or maybe not so quietly, as Mexicans’ patience with the invaders is growing thin.

          We dump them into Juarez and within a few days they are placed on a charter flight to Quito or Bogota. I wonder how they will keep them from rioting on the plane?

        2. Congress will stop grandstanding about “comprehensive” reform and settle for making a deal for the Dreamers

          If they try that, they’d better be ready for some serious pushback and repercussions. Anyone who votes for amnesty for the dreamers should expect stiff opposition in the 2026 primaries.

          The message has to be loud and clear: no exceptions. So don’t bother coming here, because you’ll end up on a plane with a one way ticket back home. And we don’t care how long you’ve been here or if you own a shack or a roofing business. If we catch you we’re sending you home.

          1. I have to provide government issued ID to open a bank account.

            I seem to recall that most banks would accept “Matricula Consular” cards.

          2. Immigrants operated on cash-only before, and they’ll do it again. Of course, they’ll do it without fancy-dancy debit cards laden with government cheese.

  23. Trump threat to immigrant health care tempered by economic hopes

    President-elect Donald Trump’s promise of mass deportations and tougher immigration restrictions is deepening mistrust of the health care system among California’s immigrants and clouding the future for providers serving the state’s most impoverished residents.

    At the same time, immigrants living illegally in Southern California told KFF Health News they thought the economy would improve and their incomes might increase under Trump, and for some that outweighed concerns about health care.

    Community health workers say fear of deportation is already affecting participation in Medi-Cal, the state’s Medicaid program for low-income residents, which was expanded in phases to all immigrants regardless of residency status over the past several years. That could undercut the state’s progress in reducing the uninsured rate, which reached a record low of 6.4% last year.

    The incoming Trump administration is also expected to target Medicaid with funding cuts and enrollment restrictions, which activists worry could threaten the Medi-Cal expansion and kneecap efforts to extend health insurance subsidies under Covered California to all immigrants.

    Alongside such worries, though, is a strain of optimism that Trump might be a boon to the economy, according to interviews with immigrants in Los Angeles whom health care workers were soliciting to sign up for Medi-Cal.

    Selvin, 39, who, like others interviewed for this article, asked to be identified by only his first name because he’s living here without legal permission, said that even though he believes Trump dislikes people like him, he thinks the new administration could help boost his hours at the food processing facility where he works packing noodles. “I do see how he could improve the economy. From that perspective, I think it’s good that he won.”

    He became eligible for Medi-Cal this year but decided not to enroll, worrying it could jeopardize his chances of changing his immigration status.

    It’s not Trump’s mass deportation plan in particular that’s scaring him off, though. “If I’m not committing any crimes or getting a DUI, I think I won’t get deported,” Selvin said.

    Petrona, 55, came from El Salvador seeking asylum and enrolled in Medi-Cal last year.

    She said that if her health insurance benefits were cut, she wouldn’t be able to afford her visits to the dentist.

    A street food vendor, she hears often about Trump’s deportation plan, but she said it will be the criminals the new president pushes out. “I’ve heard people say he’s going to get rid of everyone who’s stealing.”

    Although she’s afraid she could be deported, she’s also hopeful about Trump. “He says he’s going to give a lot of work to Hispanics because Latinos are the ones who work the hardest,” she said. “That’s good, more work for us, the ones who came here to work.”

    Newly elected Republican Assembly member Jeff Gonzalez, who flipped a seat long held by Democrats in the Latino-heavy desert region in the southeastern part of the state, said his constituents were anxious to see a new economic direction.

    “They’re just really kind of fed up with the status quo in California,” Gonzalez said. “People on the ground are saying, ‘I’m hopeful,’ because now we have a different perspective. We have a businessperson who is looking at the very things that we are looking at, which is the price of eggs, the price of gas, the safety.”

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/trump-threat-to-immigrant-health-care-tempered-by-economic-hopes/ar-AA1vXIqI

    1. and kneecap efforts to extend health insurance subsidies under Covered California to all immigrants

      Newsom is welcome to raise local taxes to pay for this, as opposed to counting on free money from DC.

      1. ““That’s good, more work for us, the ones who came here to work.””

        I don’t think that narrative is going to work anymore. That said, she’s probably safe for a couple years. But she might have to pay for her own dentist.

    2. It’s true that 47 will start with the criminals, but for sure he won’t stop there. In the interview with Kristen Welker (who hates 47), she tried to push him on this, asking a loaded question like [paraphrase] “Are you really going to deport every single possible illegal migrant that’s been here, like, forever, all 26 million of them?” 47 answered “Well I think we have to.” And he was being NICE.

      I told a friend of mine that 47 is hiding his anger for everything that’s happened. He might talk nice, but this time he’s out for (figurative) blood.

      1. every single possible illegal migrant that’s been here, like, forever, all 26 million of them

        I think there are a whole lot more than that.

    3. he thinks the new administration could help boost his hours at the food processing facility where he works packing noodles.

      And what happens if Mr. Homan starts enforces workplace laws and makes employers actually use E-Verify? Will Selvin still have a job?

  24. The Democratic Party Faces Its Day of Reckoning

    Following its crushing defeat in the 2024 election, the Democratic Party might finally face its day of reckoning. The party markets itself as the champion of the working class and a bulwark against the party of the plutocrats. But this has been a lie for at least three decades.

    The Democratic Party has partnered with Wall Street donors since at least the 1990s. Under President Bill Clinton, the party overturned Glass Steagall and other New Deal programs that had effectively restrained Wall Street greed for 60 years. It also sold out American workers with so-called trade deals that freed their bosses to ship American jobs overseas. It ended welfare “as we know it” and passed draconian crime bills that destroyed mostly black and brown communities, sending mothers and fathers to prison for decades in the name of a cruel and senseless war on drugs.

    Into the 21st century, the Democrats continued pushing the lie that they were fighting for working people. After September 11, 2001, the party put up a token resistance to the Bush/Cheney regime of illegal regime-change wars, black sites, indefinite detention and torture. All the while, it continued soliciting campaign contributions from the arms dealers profiting from Bush’s wars.

    In 2008, the party found a Black face to carry on its Wall Street-friendly agenda. Gullible Americans, myself included, were taken in by Barack Obama’s promises to end “dumb wars” and to institute a single payer healthcare system. We ignored the red flags, like the fact that Obama’s campaign broke records in pocketing Wall Street donations. It was later revealed by Wikileaks that nearly every member of Obama’s cabinet had been selected by the giant Wall Street bank Citigroup.

    It didn’t take long for President Obama to crush our hopes that he was a different kind of Democrat. One of his first acts as president was to funnel trillions of dollars to the big banks that, newly freed by Clinton from FDR-era regulations, had embarked on an orgy of unbridled greed, swindling millions of Americans out of their homes and retirement savings with a scheme to sell worthless mortgage-backed securities.

    Adding insult to injury, Obama saw to it that the bailed-out bank executives faced no criminal prosecutions and received their year-end bonuses. In their place, the Obama Justice Department brought federal mortgage fraud charges against thousands of poor people—I represented a half dozen of these folks—who had signed their names to the phony mortgage loans that the Wall Street bankers encouraged, packaged and sold to pension funds and other unwitting investors.

    The pipe dream that Obama would be an anti-war president was also quickly dispatched. During his two terms, Obama ushered in a new era of continuous war, envisioned by George Orwell and favored by Wall Street. Obama expanded Bush’s bombing campaigns into Libya, Pakistan, Yemen, Syria and Somalia. Today’s Democratic Party is indistinguishable from the Republicans in its ties to war profiteers and trillion-dollar Pentagon budgets.

    Obama also effectively ended the Democrats’ promise to fight for a true national health care system in which all Americans would be able to go to the doctor when sick without fear of bankrupting their families. In its place, Obama pushed through a health care plan developed in right-wing think tanks, that guaranteed profits (and taxpayer subsidies) for the private insurance industry and did little to contain costs.

    By 2012, Glen Ford of the Black Agenda Report was describing the Democratic Party as the “more effective evil” for using its reputation as protector of the working class to neutralize effective opposition and push through right-wing policies that the Republicans could not get passed.

    In 2016, the Democrats received a wake-up call when their chosen successor to Obama lost the White House to a crude-talking New York City real estate developer and game show host with no prior political experience. But with the help of its partners in corporate media, the party managed to limp along for another eight years, first by telling the American people that President Trump was an agent of Russia, and then by claiming that Trump was Hitler who was planning concentration camps and firing squads for his political enemies.

    Now after the November 2024 elections in which Trump won every swing state and the popular vote, the Democratic party is finally being forced to face some uncomfortable truths. The party’s partners in the corporate media initially tried blaming the election result on the voters for being too misogynist, too racist, or too dumb to vote correctly. But there is little trust that remains in corporate media.

    These contradictions could only be covered up for so long. Even with reliable partners in the corporate press, the internet has given Americans alternative sources for their news. During the last few years, in a desperate effort to keep its scheme afloat, the Democrats embraced censorship and a regime of corporate “fact checkers” to police social media and remove or punish unsanctioned speech. In so doing, the party abandoned the last of its core principles: standing up for free speech and the right to dissent.

    After decades of malfeasance and deception, it has become evident that the corporate Democratic Party cannot serve as the lone opposition party to the corporate Republicans. The American people need a viable political party that represents the interests of ordinary working people.

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2024/12/17/the-democratic-party-faces-its-day-of-reckoning/

  25. The Great Recession: What Happened and How the Aftermath Explains Trump’s Political Success

    I was in college when the Great Recession officially ended in June 2009. But I couldn’t find a job that summer or the next one because the effects of the recession, which reverberated throughout the economy, lasted for years. Americans lost their homes and their jobs. Many communities never recovered. That crisis and the botched response by the Democratic Party are crucial to understanding what’s happening in US politics now.

    Take the 2024 presidential election. Donald Trump gained support among Latino voters, Black men, some voters between the ages of 18 and 29, and voters without a college degree. Meanwhile, many Americans — especially young people — simply didn’t vote at all. Surveys found that the economy was the top issue in the election, with two-thirds of voters saying it was in poor shape in an Edison Research poll, Reuters reported. A number of the young people who voted for Trump this year don’t identify as “very or somewhat” conservative, according to the AP VoteCast survey. They were upset about issues like rising prices, housing costs, and job quality, and they didn’t believe Democrats would help them.

    Trump has claimed that under his presidency, “inflation will vanish completely.” While many economists have said that his economic policies will worsen inflation, voters were willing to take that risk. In my book, Y2K: How the 2000s Became Everything, I argue that we can’t understand contemporary politics without understanding the Great Recession and its aftermath. And part of that is understanding how Democratic leaders’ decisions helped discredit the party among those who lived through that tumultuous time.

    The Great Recession didn’t just happen. It happened because of specific choices made by politicians, including Democratic president Bill Clinton and Republican president George W. Bush, that helped deregulate the financial industry and inflate the housing market. And it happened because of the behavior of financial executives. Companies like Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and Countrywide Financial took advantage of the new freedom and started selling risky, subprime mortgages that they knew people might not be able to pay back (failing to meet the terms of a loan is called defaulting). In 2012, Wells Fargo agreed to pay $175 million to resolve the federal government’s allegations that the lender deliberately targeted Black and Hispanic customers for subprime mortgages, with some employees in private purportedly referring to these offerings as “ghetto loans” for “mud people.”

    These mortgages were then pooled together to form financial products called mortgage-backed securities by investment banks like Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Goldman Sachs. These mortgage-backed securities were, in many cases, falsely marketed as safe investments, and people put their retirement money, college funds, and savings into them. In 2007, when the economy started to slow down and large numbers of Americans weren’t able to pay their mortgage, this had a domino effect. Because the economy was doing badly, many companies had massive layoffs and stopped hiring people. And because a lot of people didn’t have jobs, they weren’t spending as much money, which meant companies weren’t growing. It was a vicious cycle.

    And yet few financial executives were punished. Banks were fined, but CEOs still got to keep their giant bonuses. There were congressional hearings, but in the US, only one bank executive went to prison. Many of the people behind the policies that helped lead to the recession — like Clinton and his treasury secretary Larry Summers, who became Barack Obama’s top economic adviser — continued to have successful careers. The government could have gone after the people responsible for the Great Recession a lot harder than it did.

    It also could have made more of an effort to help struggling Americans get back to work and stay in their homes. The Obama administration oversaw huge bailouts, but a lot of that money went to banks and corporations rather than to struggling families. The president put through a stimulus package, but its size was limited due to calculations pushed by Summers, which ended up prolonging the recovery.

    When Trump campaigned in 2016, he gained popularity in part because many Americans were angry. They felt, correctly, that American society no longer worked for them. Some of those voters loved Trump, but some of them just liked that he promised to run things differently.

    After Trump won that election, Nate, a retired federal government worker and military veteran in Pennsylvania, told a Guardian reporter that he had been a Democrat for 39 years. But he voted for Trump because he felt frustrated with Democratic leaders. “Obama created jobs, but minimum wage jobs,” he said. “You can’t support a family on a minimum wage. Our manufacturing plants are gone, the coal industry is gone from my area, and Hillary [Clinton] would just shut it down the rest of the way.”

    While you can argue with some of the details of what Nate said — for example, the growth of poorer-paid service jobs and the decline of American factories started in the 1980s — it reflects something bigger: For many Americans, the Obama years coincided with a decreasing quality of life.

    We’re still living in the country the Great Recession made. If Democrats want to win elections, they need to start campaigning (and delivering) on big economic policies like family leave, well-funded public schools, and a higher minimum wage. These policies would give all Americans a stake in our society (and they’re popular, with many progressive ballot measures winning this year even in red states). Democrats also need to focus on rebuilding in-person communities that offer alternatives to disinformation-filled online spaces. Until those two things happen, even Taylor Swift and Beyoncé can’t guarantee victory.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/the-great-recession-what-happened-and-how-the-aftermath-explains-trump-s-political-success/ar-AA1vWNdR

  26. Humans Alarmed at AI Company’s “Stop Hiring Humans” Billboards

    An AI startup called Artisan has managed to irritate virtually everybody with a controversial ad campaign in San Francisco, which has littered the city with billboards reading “Stop Hiring Humans.”

    As you may have guessed, Artisan peddles automation — specifically, in the form of an AI “sales agent,” which is also called Artisan.

    Along with its tagline suggesting human workers are obsolete, other ads from the company include eye-rolling lines like “Artisans won’t complain about work-life balance,” and “Artisan’s Zoom cameras will never ‘not be working’ today.” These are sometimes accompanied by the message: “The Era of AI Employees is Here.”

    But it’s the “Stop Hiring Humans” ads that have really stuck — and are getting the biggest ad spots. Numerous large billboards and posters are plastered with the tagline, often with the uncanny likeness of a woman, which is supposed to be one of the AI’s humanlike personas, “Ava.”

    Online, the reactions to the ads have been incandescent with fury. Creative Bloq called the campaign a “dystopian nightmare,” while numerous Reddit threads have lambasted the marketing. On X, formerly Twitter, one writer tweeted in response: “WTF are we doing as a species.”

    Indeed, the whole thing is flagrantly misanthropic even by Silicon Valley’s standards. San Francisco, like other cities part of the tech locus, has a large population of homeless and continues to be deep in the throes of a housing crisis (one image that’s caught particular flak, shown above, shows a bedraggled-looking man next to one of the signs). Flippantly calling for you to remain jobless strikes the wrong tone, to say the least.

    This is the enthymeme that the monoliths of the tech industry dance around and dress up with all kinds of marketing language, and for good reason. As Artisan has demonstrated, if these companies were more upfront with their intentions with AI — and their attitude towards us lowly human peons — they’d face outrage like this at every turn; already, someone has smashed and torn down an Artisan bus stop poster.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/humans-alarmed-at-ai-companys-stop-hiring-humans-billboards/ar-AA1vYi9w

    1. AI will probably only be able to displace people in menial jobs, and they’re already getting displaced by non AI automation. For instance, the local warehouse club store has an automated floor cleaner that makes the rounds during business hours, and have had so for some years (no AI needed)

      1. I’m guessing you haven’t been testing out some of the amazing tools that have come out. AI can already write a perfect country song in about 10 seconds, this includes the lyrics and all musical parts. It is also an expert at funk. Rock n’ roll is still a bit sketchy but soon we wont be able to tell if something actually came out in the 80s or if it’s new 80’s AI.

        When I needed to repair an 8 track machine it told me why it was not working properly, what the part was called, and then attempted to give me a 3d file for Blender that I could then print on my 3d printer. It didn’t get that part right but was close. AI is going displace a lot of people. On the flip side, it is also going to empower a lot of people.

        1. McDonalds tried using AI in the drive thru. It crashed and burned.

          An interesting story regarding your 8 track player. I wonder where it got the schematics and diagrams for that museum piece. How else did it know that some gear was stripped?

          1. I don’t expect AI to write Bohemian Rhapsody, but I hope Enya and John Tesh saved up their pennies for when they are laid off. New Age and zen beats are not very challenging.

  27. ‘‘I have come out of this trusting nobody,’ she said. ‘Buyer beware’

    I don’t disagree with that Kathi with an i, but it was still a lot cheaper than renting.

  28. ‘That’s the issue with associations nowadays. They have been neglecting their duties and responsibilities to care for the maintenance of the buildings. To blame only on what is happening to the insurance is being naive,’ Cuesta said. ‘We projected this crisis for more than two years and a half. Buildings had been abandoned for decades’

    That may be Ernesto, but let’s be clear: the lending was sound.

  29. ‘According to the city, those landlords include: PAXE properties and principal Aron Puretz, of New York with 357 units. More than 50 notices of alleged violation have been issued by the city, and 13 buildings are allegedly in foreclosure or receivership tied to city code enforcement, according to Hartford Mayor Arunan Arulampalam. The city has made emergency repairs in multiple properties and filed liens to recover the cost of tenant relocations and repairs’

    This guy did some big mortgage fraud with Freddie Mac, allegedly.

  30. ‘If we accepted the offer we’d be technically homeless because once we’ve paid the mortgage off and repaid the Help to Buy fee we wouldn’t have enough money to buy another property. If we wanted to sell it privately the surveyor said we wouldn’t get anything for it because of the amount of work that needs doing. I want them to compensate us adequately for the seven years of hell. The stress, the health problems and everything we’ve lost’

    So you’ll sell if it compensates all yer problems Dayle.

  31. ‘The barefoot investor said the real winner in this scenario was the renter. ‘They’ve enjoyed 10 years of downward dogging in the yoga room and paddling about in that fancy heated pool, plus they’ve even had a plumber on speed dial to unclog the dunny’

    That’s the spirit Scott!

  32. RE: the Ireland crack smoking problem is now? That went out in USA in the 1990s. Will Self published The Rock Of Crack As Big As The Ritz in 1995. Maybe it’s a British thing. See also: Pete Doherty

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *