skip to Main Content
thehousingbubble@gmail.com

There’s No One Here To Buy

A report from Architectural Digest. “Before the devastating Los Angeles fires this week, California already had a looming insurance crisis on its hands. In one particularly heartbreaking example, ABC 7 reported on a nonagenarian couple whose fire insurance was canceled before the Eaton Fire. ‘They’ve lived in this house for 75 years, and they’ve had the same insurance, and these insurance people decided to cancel their fire [insurance],’ said Lynn Levin-Guzman, the couple’s daughter, donning an N95 face mask as smoke rises by her family home. ‘Thank you, California insurance companies, for supporting residents who pay taxes and love California. And they wonder why people leave,’ she added, tongue in cheek.”

From WCVB Boston. “This group of Massachusetts homeowners is facing the same old problem: getting the state to help them piece their lives back together. The homeowners have all found themselves with cracking and crumbling basements, but haven’t had any luck convincing the state to find a way to help financially. Among them was Jeff Haynes, who spent a quarter of a million dollars to replace his basement in Rutland last spring. ‘The scope of the project was $250,000, and that meant basically raiding retirement money,’ Haynes said. It happened because of pyrrhotite, a naturally occurring mineral found under much of central and western Massachusetts. Homeowners’ insurance won’t cover foundation repairs, and banks won’t issue a loan for the work since the home’s value also crumbles. That leaves homeowners with their backs against the wall. ‘You are chained to a worthless home,’ Haynes said.”

The Sun Sentinel in Florida. “Christine Cordoso, a resident of the Sunrise Lakes Condominium, says her monthly maintenance fee is set to rise to $1,600 a month thanks to a new state law that requires full funding of reserves for repairs. That’s in addition to her bill for taxes and insurance for her Phase IV condo unit, she said. ‘We take very good care of our building. We’re on fixed incomes,’ she said. The coming fee hike, she said, is ‘too much.’ Sunrise Mayor Mike Ryan said the mandates are putting seniors at risk of homelessness and displacement. Hundreds of condo units are for sale in Sunrise, ‘but there’s no one here to buy.'”

Fox 35 in Florida. “Neighbors are sounding the alarm on a new housing development that’s become a hazard instead. Residents who live off Palm Bay Road near the project say no work has been done on the construction zone for about a year, and they want the mess cleaned up before someone gets hurt. Homeowners say they are scared to walk near the property at night, and it’s hard for them to even get around because the sidewalk is full of overgrown grass and trash. From the property, we could see rotting wood, broken windows, garbage and pieces of balconies falling apart on Thursday. ‘It brings transients in, not good, drugs. Police are always here,’ said Colleen Arnold, who feels unsafe walking her dogs every day. She isn’t alone. ‘It’s an eyesore, and it’s dangerous,’ said Michael Batcher. Nearby signs say the company, D32 Invest, is behind the project. ‘We’ve called them. They don’t return our calls. They don’t do nothing,’ said Arnold.”

KXAN in Texas. “A subdivision in south Austin, that is supposed to have luxury houses, instead has unfinished homes with broken windows and tattered roofs. The homes are covered in graffiti, as tall weeds grow in the drive way. The Southstone subdivision on West Dittmar Road in south Austin is currently under construction, according to the subdivision’s website. The subdivision is supposed to eventually have more than 200 luxury homes with a clubhouse, resort style pool and playground. Victor Uvalle III and his family live nearby with a direct view. He said construction began years ago, and then all of a sudden it came to a halt.”

“‘They started real fast. It looked like they had a lot of contractors out there trying to do a lot of different things,’ Uvalle III said. ‘It was a dead stop. We didn’t have nobody working, no contractors coming by.’ A few months after that, Uvalle III said they started seeing vandalism. He’s worried the vandalism moved to his neighborhood. ‘We’ve had a couple break-ins right here with my parents vehicles as well, just being vandalized,’ Uvalle III said. He said this ultimately comes down to an issue of safety for his family. ‘Riding her bike up the street, I don’t want her to think like, ‘Oh, there’s those abandoned houses that, you know, I can’t ride on that street,’ Uvalle III said.”

From Bisnow. “Nationally, multifamily owners are being squeezed. In New York City, they are being crushed. Landlords across the country, many of which invested in the sector during a time of high prices with floating-rate debt, have struggled to keep up with rising costs and slowing rent growth. The average cost to insure an affordable apartment is $1,770, a 103% increase from four years ago, according to the New York Housing Conference. ‘The free market category is doing OK. I would say that they’re treading water for the most part,’ Marcus & Millichap broker Shaun Riney said. ‘But the rent-regulated space is in a doom loop.’ ‘It takes a long time to sink the Titanic, but the Titanic is sinking,’ he added.”

CBC News in Canada. “Rental prices in Toronto are dropping, with condos and apartments going for hundreds of dollars less than they were a year ago, according to real estate experts. Errol Paulicpulle, a real estate agent with Harvey Kalles Real Estate in Toronto, says there is a greater supply of rental properties than there was a year ago and the result is a more favourable market for renters. ‘Well, it’s definitely slower,’ Paulicpulle said in an interview. ‘The prices have come down anywhere from two to four hundred dollars per unit.’ Paulicpulle, who represents dozens of clients with rental income properties in Toronto, says renters are telling landlords that they want to pay less than asking and are making requests for specific improvements when they do make offers.”

“Giacomo Ladas, associate director of communications for Rentals.ca, said the market may be correcting itself and that correction is being led by renter preferences. ‘Asking rents have gone up so exponentially over the past three or four years that rents in Ontario are still 20 to 25 per cent higher than they were when COVID started. The fact that these are going down is a great sign, but they are still so highly inflated that we kind of think that there was nowhere else for them to go but down,’ Ladas said. Ladas said a combination of factors is working to bring rents down: developers have put new condos on the rental market that were not selling, there’s greater supply of purpose built rentals, less demand from international students with new limits on international study permits; and people are leaving Toronto in search of more affordable places to live.”

From Castanet. “According to Royal LePage’s 2024 Winter Recreational Property Report, the median price of a single-family detached vacation home in B.C. is forecasted to increase 8.5 per cent. During the first nine months of 2024, these properties fell 2.6 per cent to about $1.7 million, while condo prices dropped to about $477,500. At Big White, located outside Kelowna, single-family detached homes decreased nearly 14 per cent to $1.5 million, while the average condo price fell about 22 per cent to $413,000. Joan Wolf, a Kelowna-based realtor with Sotheby’s International Realty Canada, said the ‘buyer’s market’ has properties listed longer and purchasers are negotiating more. While sales are down compared to during the pandemic, she said the benchmark price has not shifted. ‘This is a normalized market,’ Wolf told Western Investor. ‘Everyone keeps calling it a down market, but it’s very normal for property to be on the market six or nine months, even longer.'”

From STV News. “A housebuilder based in East Ayrshire has entered administration with all members of staff losing their jobs. Connect Modular Ltd, which is part of the Wee House Group, based in Cumnock has collapsed with a total of 48 members of staff made redundant across the company. The firm builds modular homes provided to housing associations, local authorities, and community trusts across the UK as part of the wider firm. Connect Modular, alongside West of Scotland Housing Association, also submitted plans to Glasgow City Council last year for the region’s first operational net zero modular housing development. Administrators said the firms had made losses on a number of historic contracts and the business faced ‘unsustainable pressure.’ Michelle Elliot said, ‘Unfortunately, following losses made on a number of historic contracts and rising operational costs, the businesses were facing significant cash flow pressure. Despite the best efforts of the director in exploring alternatives in recent weeks, the cash position deteriorated significantly placing unsustainable pressure on the business.'”

Radio New Zealand. “The number of properties listed for sale in December was the lowest since Realestate.co.nz data began. Spokesperson Vanessa Williams said although December was usually a slower month, the end to 2024 was ‘exceptionally lukewarm.’ The national average asking price was the lowest since April 2021, at $842,476. ‘The property market always cools in December, but the end of 2024 was record-breakingly quiet.’ She real estate salespeople had told her that everyone had ended the year tired and many had opted to push new listings into the new year. Eleven of the 19 regions the site tracks recorded an average price drop year-on-year. The biggest were in Central Otago, down 17.3 percent to $1.325 million, the central North Island, down 11 percent to $708,350 and Bay of Plenty down 10.9 percent to $823,926.”

This Post Has 37 Comments
  1. ‘We’ve had a couple break-ins right here with my parents vehicles as well, just being vandalized’

    Check out the photos. It looks like downtown LA.

    1. Looks like the developer paid too much for the land, so there was no way they could turn a profit, or breakeven, when higher interest rates entered the picture. But there’s a significant investment in below ground infrastructure, streets, sidewalks, curbs, streetlights, etc. Maybe the developer can go bankrupt, reopen under a new name, buy the partial development at auction from the bank and finish the project?

      1. I’m gonna guess that Austin’s meteoric growth has ended and now there is a huge surplus of nearly new and new homes. The only real question is how long until the city has the unfinished homes bulldozed before they are set on fire by meth heads After that the empty lots could lay idle for years, if not decades. And since they are built on slabs there are no basements that need to be filled in.

        Of course, given how irresponsible many leftist muni govs are, they might just leave it all there until it burns down

  2. ‘Paulicpulle, who represents dozens of clients with rental income properties in Toronto, says renters are telling landlords that they want to pay less than asking and are making requests for specific improvements when they do make offers’

    That’s the spirit!

  3. “The scope of the project was $250,000, and that meant basically raiding retirement money,’

    You see, that’s the thing about homes or any structure. They can and will breakdown. They can and will cost you a lot of money to repair. They can and will cost you a ton of money to insure. And you can expect your local government to continue to schlong you on property taxes. So thinking homeownership is an instant way to wealth is delusional.

    1. “They can and will breakdown”

      The foundation of the 100+ year old house I bought is visibly bowed, sagging, you can see it from the street. It’s been shored at least once, but that didn’t save it.

      What did people build with in Southern Colorado 100+ years ago? Some weird stew of concrete containing river rocks the size of my fist. A few blasts with the hammer chisel and I can pull chunks out by hand with a sledge and pry bar.

      Related question since you’re an inspector (different jurisdiction, I know), can I demo this down to grade and leave it in the ground? Re-build on top of it with a smaller foundation footprint, or the whole thing needs to come out including the floor?

      1. Trying to understand. Are you talking about burying the existing foundation and then placing new foundation within the old footprint? Tricky. Normally you want to get down to native undisturbed soils to establish foundation. Once you start bringing in soils there is all sorts of compaction requirements that need to take place. For example, when we have folks that remove pools and then want to build on it there is usually a soils analysis that takes place by an engineer and then a prescribed fill/compaction process. I just had one like this where they needed a daily special inspection to test compaction and then we collect the report at the end of the process. Most of the time it’s cheaper just to tear everything out and begin from native undisturbed soils.

  4. Hundreds of condo units are for sale in Sunrise, ‘but there’s no one here to buy.’”

    I’m no economics major like AOC, but doesn’t an overage of supply coupled with an absence of demand mean prices are gonna crater?

  5. ‘Everyone keeps calling it a down market, but it’s very normal for property to be on the market six or nine months, even longer.’”

    Joan, as each new month’s data comes out, your failed attempts to put lipstick on a pig are going to look even more disingenuous.

    1. ” ‘Everyone keeps calling it a down market, but it’s very normal for property to be on the market six or nine months, even longer.’ ”

      “Denial ain’t just a river in Egypt.” – Mark Twain

      – “In 1969, Elisabeth Kübler-Ross described five common stages of grief, popularly referred to as DABDA. They include:”

      1) Denial – You are here, Joan…
      2) Anger
      3) Bargaining
      4) Depression
      5) Acceptance

      – Oh, Canada!
      – I would say that for the U.S., and probably Canada as well, “normal” days on market (DOM) is around 30 days (max.). It takes nine months to make a baby, not sell a house. 🙃 I think that 6-9 months DOM is ridiculous and says the market is (way) overpriced and/or there’s a recession going on. Canada’s RRE market is way worse than the U.S., which is saying a lot, and is way beyond the dumpster fire stage; it’s at the slow-motion train wreck stage…

      – She may be confusing DOM with months of inventory. 🙃 Even so, 6-9 months of inventory is high and indicates a buyer’s market, in my view.

  6. ‘”Thank you, California insurance companies, for supporting residents who pay taxes and love California. And they wonder why people leave,’ she added, tongue in cheek.”

    I wonder why insurance companies leave.

    1. Salon
      Insurers began leaving California years before latest wildfire
      Natalie Chandler
      Thu, January 9, 2025 at 10:15 AM PST
      2 min read
      Chimneys of burnt down home Palisades California Los Angeles LA AGUSTIN PAULLIER/AFP via Getty Images

      As wildfires in California have worsened in recent years, some insurers have said they’re done covering the damage.

      State Farm and Allstate said in 2023 and 2022 they would stop writing new policies in California due to fears of massive losses from wildfires and other natural disasters, NBC Bay Area reported. The Hartford said last year it would stop selling new fire insurance policies. Liberty Mutual said it would stop offering condo and rental insurance in 2025 and would begin dropping coverage for existing clients in 2026.

      AccuWeather estimates $52 billion to $57 billion in preliminary damage and economic loss from the Los Angeles wildfires that began this week.

      https://www.yahoo.com/news/insurers-began-leaving-california-years-181532418.html

    2. I have a feeling this stupid US government will pay for the rebuilds for people without insurance. I actually know one family personally that I believe lost his house PP….he doesn’t know yet… 3 million dollar home and his insurance was dropped 4 months ago. He owns a brush manufacturer in City of Industry and I broker/represent them here in the Carolina’s. Sad situation.

      1. Too much of California is overpriced. The feds should not “build a floor under houses priced at 10x income. To paraphrase Dubya, “How did we get here?”

    3. “I wonder why insurance companies leave.”

      Perhaps it is because of decisions such as this:

      Gov. Newsom cut fire budget by $100M months before lethal California fires.

      https://www.yahoo.com/news/gov-newsom-cut-fire-budget-020119384.html

      A review of last year’s California state budget shows California Gov. Gavin Newsom cut funding for wildfire and forest resilience by more than $100 million.

      The budget, signed in June and covering the 2024-25 fiscal year, eliminated $101 million from seven “wildfire and forest resilience” programs, according to a report from Newsweek.

      The California fires, responsible for destroying more than 10,000 buildings in the Los Angeles area, are still not contained.

      Cal Fire had a $5 million reduction in spending on fuel reduction teams, including funds used to pay for vegetation management work by the California National Guard, the report noted.

      Other changes:

      $28 million cut from multiple state conservancies that expand wildfire resilience

      $12 million cut from a “home hardening” experiment that would protect homes from wildfires

      $8 million cut from monitoring and research spending, mostly dedicated to Cal Fire and state universities

      $4 million cut from the forest legacy program, which encourages landowners to manage their properties

      $3 million cut from funding for an inter-agency forest data hub

      Newsom’s director of communications, Izzy Gardon, called the budget cuts a “ridiculous lie,” in a statement to Fox News Digital Friday night.

      “The governor has doubled the size of our firefighting army, built the world’s largest aerial firefighting fleet and the state has increased the forest management ten-fold since he took office,” she wrote. “Facts matter.”

      His office attached statistics that refer to the overall increase in spending and personnel over a number of years since he took office in 2019, as opposed to commenting on the most recent cuts.

      Cal Fire did not immediately respond to a request for comment as of 8 p.m. Friday.

  7. “‘They’ve lived in this house for 75 years, and they’ve had the same insurance, and these insurance people decided to cancel their fire [insurance],’ said Lynn Levin-Guzman, the couple’s daughter, donning an N95 face mask as smoke rises by her family home.”

    The insurance companies are in the business of assuming risks. It seems these insurance companies were able to see risks that you could (or would) not see.
    The insurance company you had for 75 years decided to cancel your fire insurance. You should be asking the question “Why did they do that? What risks did they see that I did not?”

    Cancelling insurance policies should act as a red flag for the insured because cancelling insurance policies signals that there has been a change regarding the risks. This should not be all that difficult to understand.

    1. The part I don’t understand is why there isn’t some price of insurance where it is worth it for the insurance company to assume the risk they are insuring. I suspect California state government meddling in insurance markets makes it impossible for private insurers to charge appropriately high premiums to cover the risks they are insuring, but I don’t know the details at this point.

      1. [From The New Yorker …]

        The Insurance Crisis That Will Follow the California Fires
        For years, experts have warned that homeowner insurance in the state could easily collapse.
        By Elizabeth Kolbert
        January 10, 2025

        https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/the-insurance-crisis-that-will-follow-the-california-fires#:~:text=In%202023%2C%20two%20giant%20insurers,%E2%80%9Crapidly%20growing%20catastrophe%20exposure.%E2%80%9D

        ast week, on the day before New Year’s Eve, California’s insurance commissioner, Ricardo Lara, announced what his office called “a landmark regulation” to improve access to coverage. The new rule, the commissioner declared, would address the problems that California homeowners were facing in the present and, at the same time, build “a resilient insurance market for the future.” Then the Palisades Fire ignited, soon to be followed by the Eaton Fire, the Hurst Fire, the Lidia Fire, and the Sunset Fire. With damages from these still mostly uncontrolled blazes now estimated at up to a hundred and fifty billion dollars, the future of California’s insurance market is looking a lot more rocky than resilient. As one L.A.-based insurance agent put it to the Wall Street Journal, “We are in uncharted territory.”

        What is often referred to as California’s “insurance crisis” has been years in the making. The devastating Camp Fire, near Chico in 2018, caused an estimated sixteen and a half billion dollars’ worth of damage and led to a net loss for companies that had written fire policies in the state that year. In 2019, the number of homeowners’ policies in California that were not renewed jumped by more than thirty per cent. In 2023, two giant insurers, State Farm and Allstate, announced that they would stop writing new policies for various forms of property insurance in California. State Farm said the move came in response to inflation and “rapidly growing catastrophe exposure.” Last summer, it cancelled coverage for more than fifteen hundred homes in Pacific Palisades, the wealthy enclave where the first of the L.A. blazes began.

        There are several reasons that “catastrophe exposure” in California has in recent years been growing. One is that more people are moving into wildfire-prone areas. Another is that fires are becoming more destructive, in large measure owing to climate change. A 2023 study concluded that the area consumed by summer wildfires in central and northern California has increased by five hundred per cent during the past several decades and that “nearly all of the observed increase” is due to warming. Another study, put out last year by the group Climate Central, found that rising temperatures had increased the number of “fire weather days”—windy, hot, and dry—throughout California. This was particularly the case in the desert basin east of L.A., which now has an average of sixty-one more such days per year than it did five decades ago. “As our climate warms, the chances of intense, fast-growing fires like the ones Californians are facing today will keep rising,” Kaitlyn Trudeau, a senior research associate at Climate Central, said on Wednesday.

        Making a bad situation worse, at least from the insurance companies’ perspective, California’s insurance department made it hard for them to recoup or even project the growing costs of weather-related disasters. Until department rules were revised last year, they prevented companies from using so-called catastrophe models to forecast losses from wildfires; insurers could only look backward, at historical losses. Also, until last month, they could not pass on the costs of reinsurance, which is basically insurance for insurers, and which has been rising steeply in price.

        In return for the changes to the rules, insurers are now required to write more policies for homeowners in wildfire-prone areas. Some consumer advocates condemned the deal as too favorable to the industry. Others hoped that it would, finally, improve access to coverage. “We were all thinking 2025 is going to be the year insurers regain their appetite for the market in California,” Amy Bach, the executive director of United Policyholders, a California-based nonprofit, told NBC News. “Having this catastrophe hit us right out of the gate is really unfortunate.”

        California is, of course, not the only state facing—or not facing up to—a climate-inflected insurance crisis. After a series of devastating hurricanes—Harvey in 2017, Ida in 2021, Helene and Milton in 2024—property owners in Florida, Louisiana, and Texas are also finding insurance increasingly hard to afford or even obtain. The situation is similar in Colorado, where, as in California, wildfire risks are climbing. “We’re a few bad decisions away from being where California is,” Carole Walker, the executive director of the Rocky Mountain Insurance Information Association, told CBS.

        For homeowners who can’t find fire insurance, California has an insurer of last resort, known as the Fair Access to Insurance Requirements, or FAIR, plan. The FAIR plan was established by the state, but it is operated by private companies, which pool the risks. Florida, Louisiana, and Texas have similar entities, and Colorado recently established one. As insurers have pulled out of California, the number of policies written by the state’s FAIR plan has risen steeply; just since late 2023, it has grown by more than forty per cent. Meanwhile, the value of the residential properties insured by FAIR has risen to more than four hundred and fifty billion dollars, triple what it was in 2020. This has led to worries that, with all the damage from the current fires, the plan will go broke.

        “I’m concerned that we’re one bad fire season away from complete insolvency,” Jim Wood, then a California assemblyman, said back in March. Were FAIR unable to meet its obligations, the state’s insurance companies would have to make up the difference. They, in turn, would pass on at least part of the cost of this assessment to consumers, further driving up prices.

        All of which raises the question of what role insurance can—and should—play in a warming world. As the dangers of climate change in California have increased, FAIR has absorbed much of the risk. This has been a boon to homeowners in the most fire-prone neighborhoods, but it could prove a burden to other state residents if they end up picking up the tab.

        “The bet on the FAIR Plan is the state’s decision to do whatever it takes to keep property markets working, even in risky areas, and to mute the price signal of riskiness,” Susan Crawford, a clinical professor emeritus at Harvard Law, wrote in a recent Substack post. “That bet may now be being called. No one knows what will happen next.” ♦

    2. “Before the devastating Los Angeles fires this week, California already had a looming insurance crisis on its hands.”

      Somewhere embodied in this sentence is a message.

  8. Has owning a home in California turned into a game of Russian roulette with the risk a wildfire will burn down your uninsurable home?

    1. Why would you buy a home in California or Florida? It’s pure stupidity. If you have to live there renting makes so much more sense. If you need to invest in real estate, own a piece of land or home somewhere else while you rent in these places. Renting isn’t always throwing money away. Sometimes it’s a great way to keep money in your pocket.

  9. The far left wanted to defund the police. They wanted invasion of the US Borders. They wanted diversity in hiring by unqualified people. They wanted minors brainwashed into transgender operations . They wanted mandated expiermental fake vaccines. They didn’t want to do fire prevention, or even have water for LA fire threat. They want global wars. They want gain of function creation of disease. They want high crime. Destruction of small business. They want to censor free speech. They want 15 minute cities, you will own nothing and eat bugs. They want to release toxic mosquitoes, block out sun, and suck up co2 carbons, and kill chickens and livestock . They won’t take a unsafe and not effective MRNA failed vaccine technology off market and they are putting this killer technology in more products. They want lockdowns and masks .They want Banks to control you consumption and Monopoly Corporations controlling consumption as
    they control all resources with a One World Order Global Government. They want to take all freedoms and Constitutional protections based on manufactured fake Global emergencies like Climate Change and Panademics. They want a World Dictorship that deprived the global populations of
    pursuit of happiness for equity by commie and fascist BS. They want to destroy 40 to 50 % of the jobs in the next 10 years by AI and Robot replacement.

    All of the above will be forced on World populations by THE POWERS THAT BE that are working in collusion with infiltrated World Governments.

    When they say you will own nothing, eat bugs and be happy , take them at their word, that’s their end game. Look at LA burning. And I forgot to mention the appalling state of affairs of Health Insurance Co denying coverage, causing widespread death and bankruptcy , as well as property insurance making ownership becoming impossible.

    It was all pre planned. Its all nuts and soon they will attempt a Panademic based on who knows which pathogen , using the bogus PCR test to declare whatever they want. Maybe World War 3 will be the next big destructive act. The rigged economic systems are on verge of collapse.

    We don’t know what the new Trump administration is going to be able to do.
    These Powers That Be are anarchist who want to tear down civilization and all prior systems , loot the resources of earth , and subject billions of people to their forced enslavement and genocide of humanity. All the evidence adds up to this power grab by fraudster psychopaths and Rich Elites like that devil Bill Gates, Soros, etc, and the WEF.

    We tried to get rid of Governor in a recall in Ca , and I have no doubt it was rigged to keep that puppet in .
    Unreal and unbelievable, but all happening.

  10. Massive line ups for gas in LA County.
    With all these people now homeless because of the fire, I’m wondering how that will affect the functioning of the area.

    1. I’m wondering how that will affect the functioning of the area.

      As I mentioned above, business is gangbusters this week in places like Disneyland, Legoland, SeaWorld, etc. I’ll bet other activities like museums or even the beach are unseasonably busy.

  11. Healey says she ordered criminal background checks on all shelter residents last spring, but they didn’t happen

    Gov. Maura Healey said Friday the state will conduct full criminal background checks on all emergency shelter residents, explaining she requested more thorough vetting months ago but the checks never happened.

    Briefing reporters, Healey said she issued an order last spring for Massachusetts Criminal Offender Record Information checks, or CORI checks, on all residents of the state’s shelter system. However, she said her team recently informed her “that that did not happen at all sites, and that’s absolutely unacceptable.”

    Healey added: “We’re going to get to the bottom of why that wasn’t happening.”

    Her administration’s handling of the shelter system has been under scrutiny, particularly following two high-profile incidents in the last year. In March, a man was accused of raping a 15-year-old girl at an emergency shelter housing migrants in Rockland. And last month, an undocumented immigrant was allegedly found with an assault rifle and fentanyl at a shelter in Revere.

    “I also plan to work with the Legislature to take a look at any changes and to make changes to better ensure that the right-to-shelter law actually aligns with its original intent,” Healey said, referring to the law that requires the state to provide shelter to homeless families and pregnant women.

    The right-to-shelter law, she argued, wasn’t meant to cover the “waves and waves of people” who have arrived in Massachusetts in recent years.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/healey-says-she-ordered-criminal-background-checks-on-all-shelter-residents-last-spring-but-they-didn-t-happen/ar-BB1rfJ01

  12. Gov. Kelly Ayotte promises not to let New Hampshire turn into Massachusetts

    New Hampshire Gov. Kelly Ayotte may have been speaking to a Granite State crowd when she delivered her inaugural address Thursday, but she clearly had Massachusetts on her mind.

    Never one to pass up the opportunity to bash the Bay State, the Republican former U.S. senator labeled Massachusetts a “cautionary tale” during her remarks.

    “Look at the out-of-control spending, tax hikes, illegal immigrant crisis, people and businesses leaving in droves — what is normal today in Massachusetts wasn’t always this way,” Ayotte said.

    Lambasting Massachusetts’s model of “higher taxes and more government,” she vowed to woo businesses to New Hampshire with the state’s “commitment to taxpayers.”

    She also called on New Hampshire lawmakers to ban communities from passing so-called “sanctuary” policies, which generally limit local cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

    “We’ve got the Massachusetts illegal immigrant crisis right down the road if you want to see what these dangerous policies do not just to communities, but to the state budget,” Ayotte said. “They’ve spent over a billion dollars housing migrants rather than investing in their law-abiding residents. We can’t allow that to happen here.”

    Ayotte won election to the corner office in November, running on a “Don’t Mass it up” slogan.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/gov-kelly-ayotte-promises-not-to-let-new-hampshire-turn-into-massachusetts/ar-BB1rfiJL

  13. TogetherSF groups, Neighbors for a Better SF merge after election losses

    The billionaire-backed group TogetherSF Action announced Friday that it would merge with the closely aligned Neighbors for a Better San Francisco, another organization funded by wealthy figures, following disastrous election results in which TogetherSF Action’s heavily funded ballot measure tanked and its preferred mayoral candidate was soundly defeated.

    TogetherSF Action and its nonpolitical affiliate, TogetherSF, were co-founded and are run by CEO Kanishka Cheng, a former City Hall staffer, with backing from billionaire tech venture capitalist and co-founder Michael Moritz, of Sequoia Capital fame.

    Cheng is married to Jay Cheng, the executive director of Neighbors for a Better San Francisco.

    Cheng, who previously was a staffer for former Supervisor Mark Farrell and in the mayor’s office, said the TogetherSF groups had built a large community, in part by hosting events, distributing more than 250,000 voter guides, and conducting political education and issue advocacy campaigns, notably the “That’s Fentalife!” campaign, which featured satirical media messages highlighting The City’s fentanyl crisis.

    https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/politics/togethersf-merging-with-neighbors-after-ballot-measure-loss/article_2453164a-cfa3-11ef-9691-ebeb6fb691b7.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *