skip to Main Content
thehousingbubble@gmail.com

I Don’t Have The Money, I Can’t Live In The House, It’s Just A Horrible Situation

A report from the Wall Street Journal. “Real-estate investor Robert Rivani spent close to three years renovating an oceanfront mansion on Malibu’s star-studded Carbon Beach. Including the price of the original home, the project cost close to $27 million. He had been planning to list it for $40 million this spring. Last week, Rivani watched as the California wildfires tore the five-bedroom home apart, reducing it to rubble. ‘It’s catastrophic,’ he said. ‘How do you sum up losing over $20 million in 24 hours to any human being?’ Rivani said his insurance falls under the state’s already-stretched Fair Plan, which provides only up to $3 million in coverage for residential properties, so, even if it pays out, he says he will be out more than $20 million. No other insurer would cover the property for its full replacement value, he said.”

“‘The land that was once worth $15 million is probably worthless now, too,’ he said. ‘What value do you put on an entire community where the land is burnt to a crisp, where you don’t have restaurants or grocery stores, gas stations or working power?’ At least for now, Rivani anticipated that he will still have to make mortgage and property tax payments totaling north of $100,000 a month, even though there is no house. Rivani said he expects there will be a default crisis in Los Angeles as onetime homeowners find themselves unable to meet payment obligations. ‘We pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in property taxes a year and yet we don’t have working fire hydrants? It’s mind-blowing,’ Rivani said.”

Santa Cruz Sentinel. “The devastating wildfires burning through Los Angeles County this week are stoking concerns that California’s already faltering home insurance market could be thrown into deeper turmoil. Not only would existing homeowners continue to see rate hikes and lose coverage, but families that struggle to find insurance could not take out a mortgage to buy a home. In areas at extreme fire risk, from the Santa Cruz Mountains to rural corners of Northern California, fewer buyers could mean falling home prices, straining local tax bases and stunting efforts to emerge from the state’s lingering post-pandemic economic malaise.”

“Tim Linerud, whose home on stilts sits tucked into a canyon in Belmont, fears insurers’ response to the destruction wrought by the ongoing blazes. ‘We’ve had issues over the years of insurance companies canceling the policies because of the type of structure and the landscape of our property,’ Linerud said. ‘So any excuse of an insurance company to bail out, they’re going to use, and I’m worried about that.’ If insurers cannot cover those liabilities, it’s possible they could pass on those costs to all of their home and business customers in the form of higher premiums. ‘We are one event away from a large assessment — there’s no other way to say it,’ California FAIR Plan President Victoria Roach told lawmakers last year. ‘We don’t have a lot of money on hand, and we have a lot of exposure out there.'”

The Idaho Statesman. “Leslie Montgomery’s home on the eastern edge of Caldwell was supposed to be a safe harbor for her and her three children. A deeply religious author who has written several books on Christianity, Montgomery used the royalties she made from her latest book, The Faith of Mike Pence, to buy her new house in June 2023. But the home she bought from Lennar Corp. — the second-largest home builder in the nation — has become sickening, she said. Montgomery said she made a down payment of about $270,000 on the home and pays $1,900 per month mortgage on the two-story, four-bedroom home in Caldwell’s Mandalay Ranch subdivision.”

“Shortly after moving in, Montgomery started getting allergy-like symptoms, despite no family history of allergies, she said. Soon, her two sons and daughter also began getting symptoms. ‘We’ve all been sick,’ Montgomery said. Building issues have plagued the family since they first moved in, Montgomery said. To fix all the problems in the house would cost over $100,000, she said. Montgomery said she put all of her life savings into a down payment on the house. Insurance won’t pay for anything, Montgomery said, because it was a ‘builder issue,’ so she has paid out of pocket and used the rest of her money for environmental tests, medical costs, and living in hotels and Airbnbs since they were told to leave. ‘It adds up when you’re spending weeks at a time,’ Montgomery said. ‘We’ve had to go back and spend a night here or there because I ran out of money. I don’t have the money. I can’t live in the house,’ she said, her voice cracking with tears. ‘It’s just a horrible situation.'”

The Palm Beach Post. “The Florida condo market is recalibrating, as changes to the Condo Act tank the market for 30-plus year old condos. But developers looking to buy them are facing their own uncertainty. To address the lack of mandated maintenance of the state’s over 900,000 aging condominium units, the legislature made changes to the Condo Act, parts of which will go into effect in 2025. These changes mean many condo owners across the state will soon receive high special assessment notices and condo owners association fee increases. Older condo units are flooding the market but demand has dried up. With the deadline for the structural reserve studies at the end of 2024, buying these units doesn’t make sense.”

“As many condo owners will be unable to afford unusually high special assessments and COA fees, many condo projects may go into distress. It will be a game of patience for developers. Many will be willing to wait for certain projects to go into receivership and purchase projects in bulk. The threat of receivership may incentivize some unit owners to quickly organize and sell to a developer. If an association does not have a functioning board of directors, in many cases either a unit owners or one of the mortgage lenders will go to court to argue that a receiver be put in place. Once that happens, the entire situation is turned over to the courts; receivers have to answer to the courts, and all decisions need to go through court approval.”

Bisnow South Florida. “Many owners have been trying to sell their units before confronting the new reality. Condo listings rose 60% in Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties in the third quarter, according to ISG World. Values for condos averaging 30 years or older fell more than $100K, from $325K in 2022 to $218K at the end of September 2024. Selling a building isn’t always a straightforward solution, said Sam Gaita of The Corcoran Group. Many developers have targeted aging condo buildings for new projects, but getting a critical mass of unit owners to agree to sell — and getting a fair deal — is far from a guarantee. ‘These are extremely complex transactions, and you need to have an experienced broker and an experienced lawyer representing the board,’ Gaita said. ‘I’ve seen and heard of horror stories of developers tying people up for years.'”

The Globe and Mail. “When Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stood in front of his residence on Monday to announce his resignation, he spoke of his efforts to ‘get the economy ready for the future’ and to make sure it was ‘working for everyone and not just a few.’ It was a familiar refrain, dating back to Mr. Trudeau’s landslide victory in 2015. From the get-go, his economic vision focused on redistributing wealth, tackling climate change, and expanding Canada’s work force through immigration and increased participation of women, youth and minorities – with a heavy dose of deficit spending and government hires to support those efforts.”

“But a decade on, economic metrics suggest Mr. Trudeau’s experiment failed to produce sustainable growth and Canadians are reeling from an affordability crisis. His brand of progressive economics has lost its lustre, not just in Canada, but in advanced economies around the world. Perhaps the government’s most astonishing failure was its approach to immigration. As pandemic lockdowns waned, the government opened the doors to temporary foreign workers and international students, leading to the fastest population growth since 1957.”

“The Trudeau government argued over the years that high immigration would boost economic growth by counterbalancing aging demographics and filling job vacancies. McGill University associate economics professor Christopher Ragan said he opposed that philosophy while he served on Mr. Morneau’s economic growth council. ‘I think they didn’t think very well and smartly about growth,’ Prof. Ragan said. ‘And that led them down this hopeful and naive path that, ‘Oh, we’ll open the gates for immigration and that’ll be our growth strategy.’ And I think that has failed miserably.'”

From City AM. “The amount of money sellers are making from residential property in the UK has shrunk to its lowest level in a decade, as a years-long boom in house prices slows, according to new figures. Most of the Londoners who sold their property at a loss last year were selling up in central London, and had bought the house within the last nine years, Hamptons found. Property values in some areas of the capital, like Tower Hamlets, remain below 2016 levels, Aneisha Beveridge, Head of Research at Hamptons, explained. ‘However, those who bought pre-2013 in the capital have seen much greater returns, outpacing inflation too,’ Beveridge said.”

From Domain News. “The Mornington Peninsula housing market has been softening, battered by a return to city living and economic pressures following the lockdown years. The peninsula’s median house value fell 5.7 per cent over the 12 months to the end of 2024, to $915,961. ‘The Mornington Peninsula is in a downturn and it’s one of the furthest markets from its peak than the other Melbourne house markets,’ said CoreLogic head of Australian research Eliza Owen. ‘Melbourne house markets are 6.5 per cent below their peak in March 2022, if you look at just the Mornington Peninsula, values are down 14.3 per cent from a high in March 2022.’ The typical house on the peninsula costs $172,417 less than at the peak.”

“A rush of Melburnians escaping lockdowns over-inflated the once-sleepy property market, but it had boosted prices past where they would have been otherwise, even after declines. ‘The reason the downturn has been more notable across the Mornington Peninsula is because it was one of those markets that really overshot growth through the pandemic period, and overall values on the Mornington Peninsula are still 22.2 per cent higher than in March 2020,’ Owen said. ‘It’s continuing to correct as interest rates are sitting higher and for longer than expected.'”

This Post Has 126 Comments
  1. ‘The land that was once worth $15 million is probably worthless now, too’ …At least for now, Rivani anticipated that he will still have to make mortgage and property tax payments totaling north of $100,000 a month, even though there is no house. Rivani said he expects there will be a default crisis in Los Angeles as onetime homeowners find themselves unable to meet payment obligations. ‘We pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in property taxes a year and yet we don’t have working fire hydrants?’

    Yer right Bob, who would buyer yer burned dirt lot with those taxes and you get nothing for it?

    1. “…Rivani anticipated that he will still have to make mortgage and property tax payments totaling north of $100,000 a month, even though there is no house….”

      $100k/month mortgage payments for a burnt out lot is the least of Rivani’s problems.

      In California, if your home is on the coast or up to 1 mile inland (some special cases 5 miles), you must deal with the California Coastal Commission to rebuild or make *any* kind of structural modification.

      In normal times, (2-3 homeowner petitions per week), it takes typically 3 *years* to obtain a permit. Now imagine 1000’s of petitions filed at the same time.

      Welcome to California.

      1. How many will take what’s left of their insurance payouts after their creditors take their part, and move out f state?

        I’m not talking about the glitterati who already own homes in Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, Florida, etc., I’m sure that even the butterface girl with the big bewbs has more than one shack.

        1. “…How many will take what’s left of their insurance payouts after their creditors take their part, and move out of state?…”

          It’s going to be some very large fraction.

          Me thinks much litigation resulting from the recent fires will still be pending a decade from now.

          California is rapidly becoming economically uninhabitable.

          Even the rich folks have their breaking points.

          Now stir in the pot the every increasing LA homeless population and crime with the Olympics in Los Angeles in 2028. Good luck with that.

          1. California is rapidly becoming economically uninhabitable.

            I just can’t fathom how ordinary people can get by there. If I were to move there with my current salary my standard of living would take a huge hit.

            Even the rich folks have their breaking points.

            As some here have pointed outed ou, the Coastal Commission will make it nearly impossible to rebuild in many areas.

            I wonder if Larry Ellison lost any shacks? He owns like a dozen beach front places in SoCal.

        2. This is going to kill a lot of the Hollywood entertainment industry too. Many people lived in that area to be in the Thirty Mile Zone* from downtown LA. Actors and producers who lives in the zone were more likely to get work because they were local instead of “on location.” Now there are a lot fewer places to live.

          —————-
          Which is where gossip channel TMZ took its name.

          1. Aren’t most shows and many movies now filmed out of state or in Canada to save money? Sure, there still is work done in LA, like that virtual reality set Disney has (The Volume). Of course, those can be built in Georgia and Vancouver too.

        3. My guess is for most people their insurance payout is WAY less than what they owe.

          House insurance is only for cost to rebuild and is noted (max) on your policy) Most of these houses aren’t that big or that complicated. (minus the mansions of course)
          But their value is way escalated above that because land value/idiots buying/free money/who knows.

          So they might have paid 900k on their (last week) 1.1 million dollar 1500 square foot house that is insured for 350k

          Most of these people are going to have to walk and aren’t going to get a dime after insurance.

          1. It’ll depend on when they bought the shack. Those who took out huge loans will be out of luck, but those who purchased say 20 years ago might get a decent check.

    2. who would buyer yer

      Now that it’s readily apparent that the CA FAIR Plan is at best underfunded and at worst insolvent, will the CA Fair Plan continue issuing policies? Will mortgage lenders accept those policies?

      1. Will mortgage lenders accept those policies?

        That is a key question and I was wondering the same thing. The mortgage companies might just decide not to do business in specific counties. A company I worked for wouldn’t do business in some S. FL, S. Cal and N.Cal counties. Reason being Fraud risk at the time. It was really bad at the time. No idea if it still is.
        Gonna be hard to fix your house if you can’t get a loan.

    3. “The land that was once worth $15 million is probably worthless now…”

      Odds are the California Coastal Commission will prevent any rebuilding along the edge of the beach.

      1. “…prevent rebuilding…”

        Precisely. It just isn’t going to happen. Some of those shacks go back to the 1920’s when traffic along what is now called Pacific Coast Highway was almost non-existent and building codes [if any] were probable rarely enforced.

        Those homes in Malibu along PCH that were lost were structurally ‘iffy’ at best. Front doors were just feet from high speed traffic.

        Even 50 years ago, they reminded me of the beach shanty’s that one would see in Baja, Mexico.

    4. ‘Rivani said he expects there will be a default crisis in Los Angeles as onetime homeowners find themselves unable to meet payment obligations. ‘We pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in property taxes a year and yet we don’t have working fire hydrants?’

      Here’s the thing Bob… you went woke now you get to go broke…

    5. ‘Rivani said he expects there will be a default crisis in Los Angeles as onetime homeowners find themselves unable to meet payment obligations. ‘We pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in property taxes a year and yet we don’t have working fire hydrants?’

      Here’s the thing Bob… you went woke now you get to go broke.

  2. Last week, Rivani watched as the California wildfires tore the five-bedroom home apart, reducing it to rubble. ‘It’s catastrophic,’ he said. ‘How do you sum up losing over $20 million in 24 hours to any human being?’

    Cry me a river, speculator scum. You gambled and lost. But it was only Yellen Bux.

  3. ‘The Florida condo market is recalibrating, as changes to the Condo Act tank the market for 30-plus year old condos. But developers looking to buy them are facing their own uncertainty. To address the lack of mandated maintenance of the state’s over 900,000 aging condominium units’

    This article is from the last day and it’s the second time I’ve seen this 900,000 airbox number. Previously I had posted 90,000 that were 30 years or older, but that was Palm Beach, Miami, Dade and Broward counties. Maybe it’s a typo, we’ll see.

    ‘Many will be willing to wait for certain projects to go into receivership and purchase projects in bulk…Many developers have targeted aging condo buildings for new projects, but getting a critical mass of unit owners to agree to sell — and getting a fair deal — is far from a guarantee. ‘These are extremely complex transactions, and you need to have an experienced broker and an experienced lawyer representing the board,’ Gaita said. ‘I’ve seen and heard of horror stories of developers tying people up for years’

    These RE guys are a lion about how this plays out. It’s the ‘developers’ that will ruthlessly crush the loanowners. And when they get some seats on the HOA, maybe even a majority, they will vote to twist the screws even more. How do I know? I saw this movie in the 2000’s. And they will have time on their side, so dragging it out until people get desperate is part of the plan.

    Welcome to south Florida!

    1. Condominium data is hard to find, but if you look up “Florida Condominium Data and Statistics” it will link to a PDF file from the Community Associations Institute. The data is vey poorly laid out, but it looks like there are at least 100,000 units pre-1990 in Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach alone.

    2. Plus the value of the box for the homeowners is zero, or less than zero and they have no leverage as it HAS to be fixed. 200k box that needs 200k worth of work? value zero

  4. ‘Montgomery said she put all of her life savings into a down payment on the house. Insurance won’t pay for anything, Montgomery said, because it was a ‘builder issue,’ so she has paid out of pocket and used the rest of her money for environmental tests, medical costs, and living in hotels and Airbnbs since they were told to leave. ‘It adds up when you’re spending weeks at a time,’ Montgomery said. ‘We’ve had to go back and spend a night here or there because I ran out of money. I don’t have the money. I can’t live in the house,’ she said, her voice cracking with tears. ‘It’s just a horrible situation’

    It could be that baby Jeebus hates Mike Pence Leslie.

    1. ever notice that these “OMG I can’t live here I have sinus issues or allergies or some other thing that no one can find” are ALWAYS women.

      always. and the next guy who buys the house, you hear not one word

      1. yeah ,once they get on that mold train, nothings good enough to please them, the next owner gets some heavy duty ,air cleaners and dehumidifiers ,and such, the house is usually fine then…

  5. ‘If insurers cannot cover those liabilities, it’s possible they could pass on those costs to all of their home and business customers in the form of higher premiums. ‘We are one event away from a large assessment — there’s no other way to say it,’ California FAIR Plan President Victoria Roach told lawmakers last year. ‘We don’t have a lot of money on hand, and we have a lot of exposure out there’

    I guess you’ve had yer event Vickie.

  6. ‘Most of the Londoners who sold their property at a loss last year were selling up in central London, and had bought the house within the last nine years, Hamptons found. Property values in some areas of the capital, like Tower Hamlets, remain below 2016 levels, Aneisha Beveridge, Head of Research at Hamptons, explained. ‘However, those who bought pre-2013 in the capital have seen much greater returns, outpacing inflation too’

    That reminds me Aneisha, I need to go out back and work on my time machine today.

  7. Why would depositors keep their money in regional banks paying piddly .25% interest rates when they can park that money risk-free in short term US bonds that yield much higher returns? Of course any large-scale withdrawals from banks already schlonged by their CRE portfolios could lead to another SVB scenario on a vast scale, but thank goodness we have “woke” risk managers & sound oversight from the Fed to mitigate the systemic risks.

    https://x.com/SuburbanDrone/status/1878527072722731512

  8. Older condo units are flooding the market but demand has dried up. With the deadline for the structural reserve studies at the end of 2024, buying these units doesn’t make sense.”

    So my grasp of supply & demand fundamentals is a bit hazy, but doesn’t this mean prices are going to plummet? Oh dear….

  9. I can’t live in the house,’ she said, her voice cracking with tears. ‘It’s just a horrible situation.’”

    Can’t you burn votive candles before your icon of St. Mike Pence?

  10. ‘Melbourne house markets are 6.5 per cent below their peak in March 2022, if you look at just the Mornington Peninsula, values are down 14.3 per cent from a high in March 2022.’

    But…but…muh generational wealth!

  11. Salon — What’s causing bird flu to surge? Probably climate change, experts say (1/12/2025):

    “Although it’s difficult to pinpoint a direct cause-and-effect relationship between climate change and bird flu, research going back many years before the current crisis linked our heating world and natural disasters with changing migratory patterns, nesting seasons, and habitat ranges of wild birds. All of this is influencing the way avian flu spreads across the world.

    “Climate change is unpredictable because we can talk about a global increase in temperature, but that doesn’t mean it’s necessarily going to get warmer everywhere,” said Dr. Damien Joly, a wildlife biologist at the University of Saskatchewan in Canada. “But what we do know is that climate change can affect those large scale patterns, like migration, that could bring birds into contact with agricultural systems that they have not been in contact with before.”

    No link provided.

    “Experts” where have we heard that one before?

    1. I wonder how many millions of grifters around the globe are counting on getting their snouts into the climate change trough, and want to raise taxes to fill it even more.

  12. Does the big spike in the VIX this morning freak you out?

    Not to worry…it will soon drop back when everyone buys the dip.

      1. MarketWatch
        U.S. stocks are falling. Here’s why Goldman says to stay invested in 2025.
        Published: Jan. 13, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. ET
        By Christine Idzelis
        The bull market has left the S&P 500 ‘more expensive than at least 90% of the time since World War II,’ says Goldman’s investment strategy group

        U.S. stocks have retreated so far in January, jolted by a jump in Treasury bond yields after the bull market left the S&P 500 index at historically high valuations.

        But Goldman Sachs Group’s wealth-management business expects the yield on the 10-year Treasury note will end this year lower than its current level — and recommends remaining invested in the U.S. stock market despite it being historically expensive.

        https://www.marketwatch.com/story/u-s-stocks-are-falling-heres-why-goldman-says-to-stay-invested-in-2025-0bf53fab

  13. Some local news.

    Suspect arrested in 4 weekend stabbings – 2 of them fatal – along 16th Street Mall in Denver (1/13/2025):

    “A man has been arrested in connection to four apparent random attacks along 16th Street in downtown Denver from over the weekend.

    Three people were stabbed Saturday within eight blocks of each other along the 16th Street Mall. One of those victims died as a result of their injuries.

    Then, a fourth person was stabbed on Sunday evening near 16th Street and Market Street, not far from Union Station. The victim was taken to the hospital where they were pronounced dead.

    Denver police linked the same suspect to all four attacks in a Sunday night social media post. They announced the adult male had been taken into custody.

    Police said in a news release from before the fourth stabbing on Sunday that there appears to be no connection between the suspect and the victims, and the motive is unclear.

    “There’s someone out there who is indiscriminately stabbing people and causing significant harm,” said Chief Thomas during a press conference before the fourth stabbing and subsequent arrest. “We recognize the concern that causes for the community, we are doing all that we can to locate that individual and bring them to justice, and I want to assure people that there are significant resources in the downtown area to prevent something like this from happening again.”

    https://www.denver7.com/news/crime/3-people-hospitalized-in-multiple-stabbing-incidents-on-16th-street-mall-in-denver

    Consider the timeline of this: three stabbings in 45 minutes, then a whole day lapses before the fourth stabbing.

    “They’re not sending their best”

      1. I was thinking the exact same thing. Could wander around anytime of day (pretty much) hop the shuttles, no worry at all.

        now? you couldn’t pay me to go downtown.

      2. Meth.

        It’s always meth. And now that you are becoming enriched, learn to know the signs of tweaker behavior.

        They will often offer to “help” you just so they can case the joint and rob it later.

  14. A man impersonating a firefighter was arrested for reportedly attempting to burglarize a home

    A man was arrested Saturday night in the area of the Palisades Fire who had been impersonating a firefighter, Los Angeles County Sheriff Robert Luna said Sunday morning during a press briefing.

    “When I was out there in the Malibu area, I saw a gentleman that looked like a firefighter. And I asked him if he was okay because he was sitting down – I didn’t realize we had him in handcuffs,” Luna said.

    He added that deputies had just caught the suspect burglarizing a home and were turning him over to the Los Angeles Police Department.

    That arrest was one of several that happened as several wildfires continued to burn across Southern California.

    Luna said one person was arrested Saturday night in the Palisades area for curfew violation, and six people were arrested in the area of the Eaton Fire. Three of those were also for curfew violation, and the others were for various charges including drugs and weapons.

    “The individuals that we’re contacting do not live in the areas where we’re arresting them. We’re finding out they have zero business being in these areas,” Luna added.

    “So I do want to reiterate to our communities, if you do not belong in these affected areas, do not go there. You are subject to arrest.”

    He said he believes about 29 arrests have been made in the days since the fire started, including 25 in the Eaton Fire area and 4 in the Palisades Fire area.

    At least two people have been arrested in recent days on suspicion of trying to start other fires.

    https://www.ktvu.com/news/man-arrested-impersonating-firefighter-palisades-fire-zone

  15. Health care, homelessness and housing in California: Have Gavin Newsom’s promises panned out?

    When he first won office in November 2018, Gov. Gavin Newsom promised to build millions of homes to alleviate a housing shortage, end chronic homelessness, and institute a statewide single payer healthcare system, three of his most frequently talked-about commitments on the campaign trail.

    Earlier this week, the governor told reporters the state no longer faced a projected $2 billion deficit thanks to a stronger stock market, but cautioned that could change by May when he submits his revised budget proposal. And while he has a Democratic supermajority in the Legislature, leaders like Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas said they want to focus more on making life affordable for Californians than sparring with incoming President Donald Trump.

    Political consultant Dan Schnur said in an interview it doesn’t matter whether Newsom’s goals ever come to full fruition, calling him one of America’s “savviest politicians” who frequently makes bold promises and then walks them back when they fail to materialize.

    “Newsom has set himself up to be in a position where whether he keeps his campaign promises or not doesn’t matter,” said Schnur, who teaches at UC Berkeley and the University of Southern California. He pointed towards Newsom’s initial “sizable” housing pledge, when the governor said he would push to build 3.5 million homes by 2025. Newsom later pared that down to 2.5 million units by 2030, calling his original commitment a “stretch goal.”

    “Theoretically, he can apply that [label] to any promise,” Schnur said. And because Newsom is now termed out, “he can just shrug and say it doesn’t matter. It’d be a different conversation if we were talking three years ago.”

    California is home to both the highest number of homeless people (187,084) and of unsheltered homeless people in the U.S. Yet Newsom touted the state’s “significant decline in the growth [of homelessness],” citing a drop in veteran homelessness and because the state overall saw a “flat” 3.1% growth in homelessness compared to 18% nationwide.

    “That is a very good statistic as it relates to the work we’re doing to get people sheltered and to get people the support that they deserve,” Newsom said at a press conference in Oakland. “Forty states saw larger increases. In California, we’re making progress, but we have to continue to do more.”

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/health-care-homelessness-and-housing-in-california-have-gavin-newsom-s-promises-panned-out/ar-BB1rbiKt

  16. The obsession with huge in-car screens has to stop – nobody needs that much information when behind the wheel

    Anyone who has attended the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) over recent years will have spotted that major automotive players have been muscling in on consumer tech turf. Autonomous driving, AI-powered voice assistants and masses of high-definition touchscreen displays have been employed to snare column inches and take over TikTok feeds.

    This year was no different, with BMW choosing the platform to introduce the latest generation of its iconic iDrive infotainment system that, unsurprisingly, now involves a frankly terrifying amount of screen real estate.

    Due to arrive in the upcoming BMW Neue Klasse X electric SUV, with the system slated to roll out to all new BMW models in the near future, the Panoramic iDrive offering features a 3D head-up display in front of the driver, a mammoth 17.9-inch central touchscreen and, to top it all off, a separate head-up display that spans the entire width of the windshield.

    As is the way with most infotainment systems now, the central touchscreen is customizable, in so much as drivers can pin their most-used apps and key information to the home screen. Judging by imagery and video released by BMW, there’s at least three tiles that are available to constantly display information.

    What’s more, the epic Panoramic Vision head-up display (HUD) offers space for up to six fully customizable widgets, while the three directly in front of the driver are reserved for key vehicle information, such as speed and remaining battery charge.

    Already, we are up to 12 points of information, and that is before we even consider the third and final head-up display that’s projected onto the windscreen in front of the driver, which will show enormous, animated turn-by-turn directions when BMW’s navigation is in use.

    Some of the examples BMW cites when it comes to the tiles that can be pinned to its Panoramic Vision HUD are a weather app and a compass. Now call me old fashioned, but can’t you just look out of the window to see what the weather is doing and when was the last time you used a compass while driving? It’s 2025, not 1925.

    To only berate BMW would be wrong, because Hyundai Mobis also revealed that it has created the world’s first full-windshield holographic display, which beams a glut of information across the entire width of a windshield.

    According to the Korean automotive supplier, its system uses a specialized film that’s embedded with a Holographic Optical Element (HOE), which utilizes the “principle of light diffraction to project images and videos directly to the viewer’s eyes”. Say what?

    Harman also debuted its home-theater-quality Ready Display, with Quantum Dot and Blue Mini LED-based local dimming technology. That’s high-end television specification, shrunk down to something that will fit in a family SUV and will likely rarely be fully appreciated.

    After all, when was the last time you watched an entire Hollywood blockbuster while waiting for your EV to charge?

    Of course, the notion of good design is a very personal thing, but there’s also the sticky issue of user experience. Brands (ahem, Volkswagen) have had their fingers burnt in the past, unleashing bouji, sparse interiors that might look like an LA A-lister’s apartment but prove nightmarish to use and live with.

    Plastering a vehicle’s interior with screens and irritating haptic buttons typically comes at the expense of easy-to-locate physical switches that, when you are in the midst of driving (a cerebrally taxing task), are essential for distraction-free and safe motoring.

    Right now, it feels like automotive companies are designing vehicle cockpits for a time when high levels of autonomous driving are both legal and commonplace.

    I’m not simply talking about SAE Level 3, which allows drivers to ‘enjoy’ eyes-off driving under some fairly strict parameters (highways, speeds under 30mph etc), but Level 4 and 5, where the vehicle does the majority of the heavy lifting.

    We are still some way from this technology becoming a reality, and an even larger leap from legislators creating a proper legal framework for the widespread adoption. So it begs the question, why are manufacturers choosing to offer so much potentially distracting information now?

    Listen, I understand that space-age vehicle interiors is, essentially, what technological progress looks like and I’m not suggesting we head back to the days of walnut wood trim and cigarette lighters (although wood interiors are still cool, IMHO).

    But designing vehicles – that are slated for imminent release – with NASA control room-levels of interactive displays seems counterintuitive.

    Until the day arrives that I can genuinely kick back and enjoy what’s beaming out of those screens, I want to be able to drive a vehicle – not pilot Falcon 9.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/the-obsession-with-huge-in-car-screens-has-to-stop-nobody-needs-that-much-information-when-behind-the-wheel/ar-BB1rkEm9

    1. Car design esp interiors has gone backwards in the last 15 years.

      Before you had switches and buttons, you could reach down/forward and do what you needed without taking your eyes off the road.

      Now you have to take your eyes off the road to do what used to be easy. And when those screens go bad (and they will) they will either be unavailable or so expensive as to trash the car.

      1. And when those screens go bad (and they will) they will either be unavailable or so expensive as to trash the car.

        Chances are you will have to get a used one from a junk yard, for a few thousand and no warranty, if any can be found. And your dash will have to be disassembled and is guaranteed to rattle afterwards.

        These new $50K cars are throwaway. The turbo will go bad, the 3 cylinder engine will go bad, the CVT will go bad, and the electronics will all go bad before 100K miles

  17. Lithium prices to stabilise in 2025 as mine closures, China EV sales ease glut, analysts say

    Lithium prices are expected to stabilise in 2025 after two years of steep declines as shuttered mines and robust electric vehicle sales in China soak up an oversupply, although the potential for mines to reopen may cap gains, analysts and traders said.

    A nearly 86% plunge in prices of the EV battery metal over the past two years from its peak in November 2022 forced companies to mothball mines across the world. But market participants say those closures mean buoyant demand should outpace supply this year as China intensifies policy support to boost sales in the world’s largest EV market.

    The global lithium supply glut is predicted to shrink by half to around 80,000 tons equivalent of lithium carbonate (LCE) from nearly 150,000 last year, according to Antaike, China’s state-owned commodity data provider.

    “We expect to see a price recovery for lithium in 2025 as the curtailments seen in 2024, and the possibility of further curtailments, will significantly reduce the market surplus,” said Cameron Hughes, battery markets analyst at CRU Group, referring to mine closures without giving further details.

    China doubled EV subsidies in July and more than 5 million cars sold as of mid-December had benefited from the incentives.

    China’s EV subsidies contributed to a lithium price rally late last year, and should continue supporting prices in 2025, three analysts and two traders said.

    “The uptick in lithium trade business in the fourth quarter of 2024 can be undeniably attributed to the policy of providing subsidies,” a buyer at a mid-sized cathode material plant in China said on condition of anonymity as the buyer was not authorized to speak to media.

    https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/topstories/lithium-prices-to-stabilise-in-2025-as-mine-closures-china-ev-sales-ease-glut-analysts-say/ar-BB1rlrWP

  18. Canadian tech leaders decry Trudeau’s decision to prorogue Parliament, leaving policies in limbo

    Canadian technology leaders were once hopeful that the Liberal government of Justin Trudeau would deliver on an ambitious innovation agenda and help unleash Canadian prosperity and productivity.

    But by the time he announced his resignation and prorogued Parliament, many had long lost faith in his government’s commitment to their cause and are now actively advocating for change in Ottawa.

    “He said all the right things in the early days, but after talking a good game, ultimately, his government will largely go down as a disappointing one for the Canadian tech and innovation sectors,” said Andrew Graham, CEO and co-founder of Toronto-based fintech company Borrowell.

    Now, unanswered questions about policies, such as the capital-gains tax and the Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) tax-incentive program, have left the industry in a state of uncertainty during Parliament’s prorogation, said John Ruffolo, founder and managing partner of Maverix Private Equity and co-founder of the Council of Canadian Innovators (CCI), which represents domestic tech companies. And to investors or the incoming U.S. administration, uncertainty is not an attractive trait, he added.

    “The technology community today has never been so united in their disappointment,” Mr. Ruffolo said.

    In recent months, several investors, entrepreneurs and tech executives have taken to social media to denounce the Liberal’s economic policies and often express their support of a new, Conservative-led government. Several leaders of Shopify have voiced their displeasure on X, including CEO and co-founder Tobi Lütke, who took to the social-media platform to decry Mr. Trudeau’s decision to prorogue Parliament, writing, “What isn’t OK: Have millions of Canadians watch from the sidelines for months while the party figures itself out.”

    The impact of the Liberals’ sluggish innovation agenda extends beyond Canada’s borders, Mr. Ruffolo said. For investors in the United States, he said the Canadian tech sector is becoming an increasingly unattractive option because of its instability. And the uncertainty around how U.S. president-elect Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs could apply to Canada isn’t helping, he added.

    “We’re getting a lot of feedback from U.S. tech leaders basically looking at Canada going ‘What the hell is going on up there?’” Mr. Ruffolo said.

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-canadian-innovation-tech-trudeau-steps-down/

  19. ‘There to be won’: Peter Dutton must emulate Canada’s bold opposition leader Pierre Poilievre to get Coalition over the line at Federal Election

    Memo to Peter Dutton: Just copy Pierre Poilievre.

    The Canadian-American economist and diplomat John Kenneth Galbraith once wrote: All successful revolutions are the kicking in of a rotten door.

    While Donald Trump can justifiably claim credit for the beginning of the end of the prime ministership of Justin Trudeau, the groundwork had been laid for the demise of the woke pin-up boy by the leader of Canada’s opposition, Pierre Poilievre.

    Since his election as leader of the Conservative Party in 2022, Poilievre decided to do something unusual for centre-right politicians in the Anglosphere these days: he would not, as his predecessors had done, show timidity in the face of an opponent who had won three elections by trying to outdo him on the left, or adopt a “small target” strategy.

    Rather, he set out a clear centre-right product differentiation in terms of policy and ruthlessly attacked Trudeau for his numerous failures, which have arguably left Canada more economically and socially worse off than at any time since World War II (thus Trudeau has emulated, if not outdone, his father, Pierre, who left office in 1984 highly unpopular amid an economic crisis).

    Poilievre has enabled the rotten Trudeau door to be kicked in.

    He has taken on climate ideology by campaigning to repeal Trudeau’s carbon tax and promising more pro-mining policies – the province (state) of Alberta, for example, is rich in oil and gas.

    He has promised to cut out-of-control government spending and reduce taxes.

    As Judith Sloan has said, in last year’s Canadian federal budget, it was forecasted to remain in deficit for the rest of this decade (where else have we seen that?).

    Poilievre also stands up to journalists by calling them out – Ron De Santis-style – over their left-wing bias.

    He will cut Canada’s immigration rate, which has also increased pressure on cost-of-living and gotten Trudeau into trouble over increases in violent crime across the country.

    He opposes Trudeau’s extremist agenda on identity politics and was one of the few who spoke out against Canada’s draconian response to COVID, where Trudeau called those who disagreed with him racist and cut off their bank accounts.

    In the teeth of lobbying from big business who have done the Coalition no favours, Dutton must promise that immigration will return to sensible, not uncontrolled, levels, so that it does not place undue pressure on the housing market and is premised on the notion that people come to this country agreeing they will adopt its core values, i.e. a commitment to Western liberal values, without losing their heritage.

    On energy, there is now ample evidence around the world to demonstrate the ideological folly of net zero.

    It was one of the reasons for Trudeau’s demise, and the principal reason the German government collapsed, since it has led to tens of thousands of job losses and a prolonged recession there.

    However, promises to defund the ABC, stop men being allowed into women’s bathrooms and junk the national curriculum, which Dutton has rightly said is indoctrination, not education, would cement the Coalition as the party of common sense in tune with the values of most Australians.

    Pierre Poilievre knows that timidity does not win elections.

    The next federal election is there to be won.

    Peter Dutton could do worse than copy Poilievre by setting out an agenda that a centre-right party worthy of the name can fight on to successfully kick in the rotten door that is the Albanese government.

    https://www.skynews.com.au/insights-and-analysis/there-to-be-won-peter-dutton-must-emulate-canadas-bold-opposition-leader-pierre-poilievre-to-get-coalition-over-the-line-at-federal-election/news-story/5116121b03a0644b280cdbfe4a5395dc

    1. “10YR@ 4.805%”

      – (Long) rates will likely keep rising until something breaks.
      – With our public and private sector economies so highly indebted, I don’t think it will take much more than about 5% on the 10 yr. note to do that. We’re getting close. The housing market is already frozen, and housing is no small part of the U.S. economy. Watch the house builder and house improvement company stonks.
      – I think we’ll set 5% sooner than later.
      – The bond vigilantes are just doing their thing. The U.S. Treasury and Janet Yellen are having their “Liz Truss moment” since the Fed cut (short-term) rates back in Sept. Long rates are having none of it. Too much (deficit) spending and debt.
      – Mortgage rates key off of the 10 yr. U.S. Treasury yield. The Fed can set short-term rates via the FFR, but has no control over long-term rates. That’s a good thing and one of the few remaining and functioning free market controls. Central planning has generally screwed up the entire real / Main St. U.S. economy. This has been going on since at least the GFC of 2008-2009, with special emphasis since the pandemic, including further extreme stimulus ahead of the 2024 presidential election. Thanks for all of that inflation.
      – The Fed did this for political reasons in the 2024 presidential election year. Exactly why the Fed cut is a mystery, since there’s a 12-18 month lag of the economy with rate cuts; they didn’t do anything in 2024.
      – Congress’ fiscal excess spending – at 6%+ of GDP in 2024 – was a more immediate part of the extreme stimulus in 2024 to try to help Comrade Kamala elected.
      – Now everyone gets to have the (ongoing) high inflation as a result of this.
      – The housing market remains unaffordable, due to the ridiculously high prices from the ridiculously low rates during the pandemic. Lower rates won’t fix the high prices; low rates caused high prices. Prices need to come down, and a lot. New and used house sellers: Are you listening?

    2. What do you guys think? There is a rumor on financial groups that a bunch of auto-trading algorithms start to kick in harder with the 10yr at 5%.

      A little worried about that – what happens to a bunch of the zombie debt companies – there could be a bunch of layoffs

  20. – More anecdotal evidence that buying a new house from 2020+ is probably a bad idea. This is challenging, since existing / used / resale house sellers aren’t yet cutting prices like the new house builders are to move inventory. Yes, housing is the most unaffordable ever; the housing market is FUBAR in every way.
    This crap quality 💩 was also the case during the last housing bubble (1.0) in the 2004-2008 time frame. Back then I recall defective or contaminated sheet rock / drywall from China, among other issues. Today the primary concern I have is build quality, including workmanship from completely unskilled illegal alien labor (e.g. Guatemala) and cheap building materials.
    – I’ve already heard other recent horror stories, including D.R. Horton in SC last year.
    – My advice: Avoid new construction (2020+) and have an independent inspection done by reputable company not tied to either the builder or the City / County / State inspectors. This would be for either new or used house purchase.
    – In my view, there’s not a lot of trust out there today, but there’s plenty of corner-cutting, fraud, and outright lies. This isn’t limited to the housing industry / REIC, BTW; it’s national and global.
    – Caveat emptor.
    – Maybe a little mercy on the buyer here… 🙏

    \\

    The Idaho Statesman. “Leslie Montgomery’s home on the eastern edge of Caldwell was supposed to be a safe harbor for her and her three children.”

    “Building issues have plagued the family since they first moved in, Montgomery said. On move-in day, there were still painters and contractors working on the house. The inspector wouldn’t approve the home at first because of backyard flooding, which still happens, she said.”

    “Reports from the environmental tester and follow-up inspections showed that the heating, ventilation and air conditioning system was undersized and blowing insulation into her son’s room, and five windows were put in upside down. The vapor barrier below the house, which helps prevent moisture buildup and mold, was cut up, and there were no air vents to allow circulation.”

    “A test from Boise’s Wickstrom Service Co. found that the house had over 1½ times the amount of carbon dioxide than an average home and said “steps should be taken urgently” for it. The test also showed that the levels of chemicals and particulate matter were above health guidelines for the general public.”

    “Carbon dioxide “builds up in the home when there is no mechanical ventilation for fresh outdoor air,” according to the test report. “Ventilation has a great impact on health.”

    Some of these health concerns from carbon dioxide include lower cognitive function, increased risk of airborne diseases, eye irritation, a sore or dry throat, coughing, sneezing and congestion, according to Wickstrom. The particulate matter and chemicals present can also lead to asthma, trouble breathing, dizziness, skin problems and headaches.”

    “Elijah had most of these symptoms, according to a note from his doctor that Montgomery provided to the Statesman”

    “Montgomery said contractors had also left rat poison strapped to a wooden beam under the house. Lennar, she said, had no explanation for the vapor-barrier cuts or why rat poison was left under the home.”

    “I’ve been waiting a year and a half,” Montgomery said. “Nobody’s done anything.”

    “The home, she said, is covered with mold, and the flooded backyard at times has been “like a waterbed.

    “We’re breathing mold, we’re breathing insulation (there),” Montgomery said. “All the vents … are filled with debris, nails, sawdust. We’re breathing that too.”

    “To fix all the problems in the house would cost over $100,000, she said.”

    1. – My follow-up comments.
      – Did Lennar do any stock buybacks recently? If so, how much? If so, then the buyback $ take away from $ put into the build quality, including cheap, unskilled labor. Make stock buybacks illegal again.
      – In my view Lennar is preying on new first time buyers by letting this house get to the sale stage without fixing these obvious issues.
      – Where were the local government code inspectors in the build process? Same problem as D.R. Horton in SC, as I recall.
      – If this were me, and thank God it’s not, I would get a hire (good) attorney. I think the case would be easy to win, since a woman was clearly taken advantage of, both she and her children’s health were compromised, and Lennar has deep pockets. Go to jury trial. They could get a large judgement against Lennar and set legal precedent for any other cases and just maybe help to prevent this kind of fraud in the future. Maybe, but it would need to be a large and painful $ payout from Lennar.

      1. – Lennar Corp. “Repurchased 13.6 million shares of Lennar common stock for $2.1 billion” in fiscal year 2024 (Nov. 30, 2024).
        – Plenty of $ for stonk buybacks, but not so much for actually building quality houses apparently…

  21. Aliens, Trump, military: Sooke speculates over origins of low-flying object

    A mysterious low-flying object spotted in the skies above Sooke has got imaginations running wild.

    Sightings of the unidentified object were made around 4 p.m. on Wednesday Jan. 8, with speculation of its identity ranging from a military drone, a private jet, right through to an alien invasion.

    Alexandra Cottingham was first to raise the alarm, sharing on social media she had seen a “massive drone, the size of a small car, silently flying above” her as she drove her car on Grant Road, heading west.

    “At first I thought it was a plane, but it was flying too low and was at hydro-line height,” Cottingham told Sooke News Mirror. “It looked very similar to a military unmanned aerial vehicle.”

    Cottingham describes the unidentified aircraft as slow moving, dark grey or black in colour, with no flashing lights or visible markings.

    “I felt really creeped out and astonished, because it instantly reminded me of all the drone and orb activity in New Jersey and all over the world.”

    “It was about the size of a sedan,” she added.

    Other Sooke witnesses shared their sightings in response to Cottingham’s social media post, some describing a “decent-sized plane flying low.”

    “Never seen that size of plane flying that low,” said one Sooke local.

    “It’s Trump surveying Vancouver Island to see what sections of the island he wants to take over,” said another, in reference to U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s recent comments that Canada should become the 51st state.

    https://www.vancouverislandfreedaily.com/home/aliens-trump-military-sooke-speculates-over-origins-of-low-flying-object-7751306

        1. I love that driveway. I’m really tired of the large concrete slabs that are prone to cracking, or worse yet, messy asphalt.

        1. It wasn’t that long ago that a crap ton of homes in Poway burned down. They used to really like shake roofing there, not so much anymore. That fire actually made it across the San Diego city limits. Could have been a lot worse. Almost every car in the city was covered in ash.

        1. Thanks for the link.

          As kids I remember the glow of fire in the night sky over the San Gabriel mountains whenever we visited grandma’s house. We would “camp” in the backyard,,, always very warm, never needed to zip the sleeping bag.

    1. “Nice house, but the sellers are still in denial that the bubble is rapidly deflating:”

      – FL has a lot of housing problems right now and is leading the way (lower) in price.
      – Price increases during the pandemic bubble due to ultra-low sub-3% mortgage rates and the “wealth effect” on steroids. Sure it’s another housing bubble, but there are price increases due to low rates and also price increases due to general (CPI) inflation. What do we actually get? Real or nominal prices?
      – Hopefully prices return to some level of affordability for the average shelter-buyer. I guess we’ll see.

      – Price history from the Zillow website link above:

      Estimated market value
      Price history

      mm/dd/202x Price change $???,???
      12/12/2024 Price change $399,999
      6/24/2024 Listed for sale $515,000 +74.6%
      9/3/2020 Sold $295,000

  22. ** “Alexandra Cottingham was first to raise the alarm, sharing on social media she had seen a “massive drone, the size of a small car, silently flying above” her as she drove her car on Grant Road, heading west.”

    next thing you know Alex is obsessively sculpting a hollow flat-topped mountain out of mashed potatoes on her living room floor.

  23. Mississauga Condos Market in DEEP Trouble

    Honest real estate talk 🇨🇦

    1 hour ago

    Mississauga condos market is off to a slow start in 2025. Only 8 condos sold in the Square One area of Mississauga so far. All focus is on the Toronto condo market but Mississauga condo market is not doing a whole lot better.

    Homes in Mississauga were pretty flat in 2024 and almost identical to 2023 except for one key difference. There were a lot more active listings.

    If you’re trying to sell your Mississauga condo be sure to price it accurately as right now we’re sitting at about 7 months of inventory for condos in MIssissauga.

    We’ll see how much the market picks up in the Square One condos in the spring because as of right now it’s quite slow.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4n0C3lFY7bU

    5 minutes.

  24. LA libtards facing massive uninsured housing losses will be severely inhibited in their ability to push degeneracy, perversion, and radical-left “woke” agendas on the rest of the country. Remember, these were the same totalitarians who wanted to put the unvaccinated into camps, marginalize them from society, and take away their children. Karma’s a biatch, commies!

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14278653/LA-fires-insurance-crisis-anger-homeowners.html

    1. Leo Frank III, a 66-year-old actor who lost his family home in Altadena, said he fears insurers could drag their feet on paying claims and fail to cover the full cost of reconstruction.

      ‘We will rebuild. No one is taking our house,’ said Frank, as he hunted for a shower seat for his 96-year-old mother in a parking lot full of donated supplies in Pasadena. ‘But it will be a mess.’

      Frank said he knows some neighbors who lost their homeowners coverage prior to the fires as insurers retreated from parched regions in California increasingly prone to wildfires. ‘We were lucky we still had a policy,’ he said.

      ‘No one is taking our house’

      Yer shack is gone Leo.

      1. ‘No one is taking our house’
        Not if you can write a check for the new construction and have connections to get permits and are willing to run “naked’ with no insurance because getting a loan might be damn near impossible while the mortgage lenders decide how much risk they are willing to take. But of course, if Fannie/Freddie decide to buy these S. Cal loans with very limited risk to the mortgage company, well, party on Garth!

    1. Here is a much better articles describing the survey that Poso refers to:

      https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/01/13/deep-state-gearing-nearly-half-federal-employees-swamp-plan-resist-trump-poll-finds/

      The pollsters binned the groups into
      1. Elite (post-grad, $150K, urban)
      2. Main Street (not post-grad, not urban, under $150K)
      3. FedGov Managers* (live near DC and $75K+)

      Out of the FedGov Managers:
      Overall: 44% would work to support DJT Admin, 42% would work to resist DJT Admin
      89% of Repubs would support DJT
      73% of Dems would resist DJT

      If DJT gave a lawful order that felt like it was bad policy:
      17% of Harris voter FedGovs would follow the order
      64% of Harris-voter FedGovs would ignore the order

      FedGovs were also likely to name niche topics as an issue, such as guns or climate change.

      —————
      *Not sure why they call them “managers” but oh well.

    2. Federal employees, Representatives, Senators, judges, political appointees, the President and Vice President of the United States take an oath of office. When Hillary said, “He’s not my president!”, she should have been impeached.

  25. The Democrates hate any efforts to expose the abject failures of the Democratic machine in California, in which their priorities caused the epic fire disaster.
    So, they want censorship of exposure of the Democratic failures in California.
    Guys like Newsom and the Mayor just want to spin their lies and word salad about their failures regarding fire prevention for Ca.

    And Newsom was probably going to be the 2028 candidate for Dems for President of US. And, a possible Harris for Governor of Ca. in 2 years.

    How do you like these puppets for the invisible hand of the Powers that Be ?

  26. Monday Mirthiness: CNN Freaks because polls show most people don’t think “climate change” is responsible for the LA fires.

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/01/13/monday-mirthiness-cnn-freaks-because-polls-show-most-people-dont-think-climate-change-is-responsible-for-the-la-fires/

    You just have to laugh when they get upset over the propaganda just not working anymore.

    “The searches for wildfires – up 2,400%. The most ever. Search for climate change? It went down 9%. In California, no increase in the search for climate change.”

    “Americans don’t connect wildfires to climate change.” Oh, the humanity! Watch the video:

    [A 2.5 minute video appears here:]

    1. Related article.

      WEF Elites Unveil Plan To Use Carbon Controls As A Trojan Horse For Global DEI (1/13/2025):

      “The narrative is that these parts of the world have been victimized by climate change perpetrated by the developed world. In other words, our success is supposedly built on the backs of poor nations. It’s nothing more than a rewriting of the old Marxist attack on free markets – If someone wins then someone else has to lose and that’s just not fair, so let’s tear the whole society down so that there can be no winners.

      But it’s not free markets that have created the wealth gap that enrages leftists. International corporations are, in fact, socialist by definition and by nature. Without protection from governments, without their extensive partnerships with bureaucrats and politicians along with their limited liability and corporate personhood, most companies would not have an edge on everyone else.

      Carbon credits will only exacerbate that dynamic and widen the wealth gap even further, because carbon taxation will crush small businesses and leave only massive corporations able to weather the tax burden.

      Sure, tax dollars from rich countries will also be redistributed to poor countries, but this money will not be going to the destitute in Africa or Asia. It will be going into the hands of more corporations, more non-profits and more politicians. In the end, the middle class which made the west a beacon of freedom will disappear completely. Everyone will be equal – We will all be equally poor.

      The WEF calls this shift a global “reorganization” of how we engage with the economy. At the forefront of this plan are, once again, globalist think tanks and non-profits partnered with the biggest corporations and central banks.”

      https://alt-market.us/wef-elites-unveil-plan-to-use-carbon-controls-as-a-trojan-horse-for-global-dei/

    2. You just have to laugh when they get upset over the propaganda just not working anymore.
      Some people still believe the BS, but some guys I know are starting to see the lies as lies, funny thing, some see the lies and they are OK being lied to non-stop.

  27. The GlobalNet Zero Financial Cartel, Falling Apart.

    https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2025-1-11-the-global-net-zero-financial-cartel-falling-apart

    Less than three weeks ago, on December 23, in a post on optimism about the potential demise of the green energy fantasy, I took note that two of the largest U.S. banks had just quit something called the “Net Zero Banking Alliance.” The two were Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo. These two banks, along with many others, including all of the biggest ones, had joined the NZBA as it was getting organized under auspices of the UN back in 2021. NZBA, together with other related groups organized around the same time, aspired to be cartels of financial institutions that would save the planet by starving hydrocarbon fuels of all investment capital, while re-directing the money to the “green” energy transition. Now, shortly after the re-election of Donald Trump, two of the biggest banking giants had decided to exit. Could this be a sign that the zero-carbon green energy fantasy was losing its grip?

    In the short 19 days since that post, the trickle of resignations from the NZBA and related groups has turned into an avalanche. In the blink of an eye, what once seemed a serious threat that hydrocarbon fuels could be snuffed out by a group boycott of investors has almost entirely gone away.

    More on the latest developments later in this post. But first, some history of NZBA and the related alphabet soup of do-gooders.

    2021 was the year that the UN’s big climate confab, known as the “Conference of Parties” or “COP,” was to be held in Glasgow, Scotland. Although the COPs are normally held every year, there had not been one in 2020 due to the Covid pandemic. After the year hiatus, COP-26 was ultimately held from October 31 to November 13, 2021. Boris Johnson, Prime Minister of the UK, who had converted from one-time climate skeptic to all-in alarmist, was determined to make this COP-26 the be-all and end-all of all COPs. The swarms of little aspiring tyrants in UN bureaucracies, just off their hugely successful Covid power grabs, were ready to flex their new muscles in the climate arena.

    In the many months of preparations for the Glasgow conference, the UN got the bright idea of organizing all of the world’s big financial institutions into cartels to direct their capital to an “energy transition” and away from hydrocarbon fuels. To achieve this goal, in April 2021 there was formed an entity called the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, or GFANZ. According to its website:

    The Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) brings together leading financial institutions and other financial services sector participants who have individually decided to support the objectives of mobilizing capital and addressing the barriers companies face to scaling decarbonization. . . . GFANZ was founded to establish a forum for addressing and catalysing action toward the sector-wide challenges and opportunities associated with the net-zero transition.

    The moving force behind this initiative appears to have been a guy named Mark Carney. Have you heard of him? Here is a picture of him from the GFANZ website:

    [A photograph appears here …]

    Carney is a native Canadian, and a big-time guru in the central banking world: he was the Governor of the Bank of Canada from 2008 to 2013, and then promptly moved to become the Governor of the Bank of England from 2013 to 2020 (the first non-Brit to hold that position). Along the way, Carney became one of the top evangelists of the climate alarm religion. Upon leaving the Bank of England, he hopped over to the UN, where he got the highfalutin title of “Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance.” According to its website, “GFANZ was launched in April 2021 by UN Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance Mark Carney and the COP26 presidency to accelerate the transition to a net-zero global economy.”

    Carney became the Chair of GFANZ. By the time of COP-26 in November 2021, Carney had also recruited to join him as Co-Chair none other than the ultimate climate hypocrite, Mike Bloomberg (of the seven houses and eight private aircraft). According to the GFANZ website, the two remain Co-Chairs today.

    GFANZ was then instrumental in organizing a series of subsidiary groups divided by industry sector. Relevant to today’s post are the NZBA (formed contemporaneously with GFANZ in April 2021), and the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative, NZAMI, which actually had been launched a little earlier in December 2020.

    Both the NZBA and the NZAMI were rapidly successful in recruiting to their membership essentially all the biggest names in their industry sectors. The missions statements of the groups are written in a bureaucratic style that makes them difficult to understand, but it is clear at least that the idea is to stop the financing of the hydrocarbon fuel industry. For example, here is the first item of the “Commitment Statement” of the NZAB:

    Transition the operational and attributable greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from their lending and investment portfolios to align with pathways to net-zero by 2050 or sooner.

    Which brings me to the latest developments: The exits from the NZAB of Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo in early December quickly opened the barn doors for the other big players to rush out. On December 31, Reuters reported that Citibank and Bank of America had just quit the NZAB. Morgan Stanley announced its exit on January 2. JP Morgan quit on January 7. These six big banks among them have a market share of more than 25% of the entire U.S. banking industry.

    And then, just yesterday, the largest asset manager in the country, BlackRock, quit the NZAMI. Of the three largest asset managers, another one, Vanguard, had already quit back in 2022. That leaves only State Street remaining, of the big three.

    Meanwhile, in case you are wondering what is going on with Mark Carney, he appears to be a leading candidate for leader of Canada’s Liberal Party now that Justin Trudeau has quit. The CBC, in a piece yesterday, says that Carney has the backing of some 30 Liberal MPs. That would mean that Carney could become the next Prime Minister of Canada, should the Liberals win the election expected to be held some time this year. On the other hand, according to the latest polls, it looks like the Liberals are headed toward one of the most decisive wipe-outs in the history of Canada. This poll, from CBC News on January 6, concludes that if the election were held that day, the Conservatives would win approximately 227 seats to the Liberals’ 44 (in a Parliament of 338).

    So Carney may get a chance to test how well the climate alarm message continues to sell to the Canadian voter. So far, it’s not looking good.

  28. California’s Fire Catastrophe Is Largely a Result of Bad Government Policies.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/californias-fire-catastrophe-largely-result-120037494.html

    In the weeks, months, and years to come, there will be plenty of blame to share for the lapses that let the California wildfires of 2025 get so out of hand, costing lives and tens of billions of dollars. The fact that I wrote “of 2025” to distinguish these fires from other outbreaks should make it clear that these fires are anything but unprecedented, meaning that they should have been anticipated and their causes addressed. That they weren’t points to a massive failure in policy.

    As I write on Sunday, January 12, Los Angeles Fire Department Chief Kristin Crowley is pointing fingers at Mayor Karen Bass for stripping the department of key resources and funding, California Gov. Gavin Newsom vows to find out the reason fire hydrants went dry during efforts to battle the devastating blazes, and everybody wants to know why a major reservoir in Pacific Palisades was empty and offline for a year. When faced with hard questions, state and local officials including Bass and Newsom are practicing more impressive dodging and weaving than we saw during the Mike Tyson–Jake Paul fight.

    But that dodging and weaving can’t erase the serious missteps that led to this very predictable moment.

    Regulatory Delays with Devastating Consequences
    “Proactive measures like thinning and prescribed burns can significantly reduce wildfire risks, but such projects are often tied up for years in environmental reviews or lawsuits,” Shawn Regan, vice president of research at the Montana-based Property and Environment Research Center (PERC), told me by email. “In places like California, these delays have had devastating consequences, with restoration work stalled while communities and ecosystems burn to the ground. Addressing the wildfire crisis will require bold policy changes to streamline reviews, cut red tape, and ensure these projects can move forward before it’s too late.”

    For example, as I’ve written before, under the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), members of the public and activist groups can formally object to proposed actions, such as forest thinning, through a bureaucratic process that slows matters to a crawl. If that doesn’t deliver results, they move their challenges to the courts and litigate them into submission. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) creates additional red-tape hurdles at the state level, imposing years of delays.

    Regan and his colleagues at PERC have frequently addressed this subject—presciently, you might say, except that everybody except California government officials saw this moment coming.

    Wasted Water
    “From water rules that cause shortages to red tape that fuels extreme wildfires, state and federal policies have deepened California’s most pressing environmental challenges,” Regan wrote in 2023. “As a result, the Golden State now confronts the consequences of these choices, with destructive effects on its natural landscapes, its economy, and its residents.”

    “Water in California is often allocated not through markets but through inflexible, acrimonious, and ineffective political processes,” he added. He called out subsidized water—especially, though not exclusively, for agricultural use—which divorces supply from demand. Also at fault are “use it or lose it” rules which discourage water conservation lest allocations be reduced in years to come.

    When it comes to sourcing and storing water, “Officials have delayed or rejected proposals to build desalination plants that convert saltwater into drinking water,” even as “the state hasn’t built a significant new reservoir in more than 40 years,” leaving water from rains and floods to flow away, uncaptured. “Nearly all of the water that gushed through the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta was flushed out to sea in an effort to comply with state and federal environmental regulations aimed at protecting the delta smelt.”

    Badly Managed Forests
    Also important, California has failed to effectively manage its forests. “Decades of fire suppression, coupled with a hands-off approach to forest management, have created dangerous fuel loads (the amount of combustible material in a particular area),” Regan wrote. Ominously, he added: “With conditions like this, all it takes to ignite an inferno is a spark and some wind.”

    In 2020, Elizabeth Weil of ProPublica also named California’s forest management as a serious concern.

    “Academics believe that between 4.4 million and 11.8 million acres burned each year in prehistoric California,” Weil noted. “Between 1982 and 1998, California’s agency land managers burned, on average, about 30,000 acres a year. Between 1999 and 2017, that number dropped to an annual 13,000 acres.” She emphasized that “California would need to burn 20 million acres—an area about the size of Maine—to restabilize in terms of fire.”

    As Weil summarized the issue, “We live in a Mediterranean climate that’s designed to burn, and we’ve prevented it from burning anywhere close to enough for well over a hundred years.”

    The problem is that if you don’t let forests burn in a natural and healthy way while focusing fire suppression on human communities, you’re likely to get out-of-control conflagrations. In the absence of water to fight the resulting fires, you’ve lost any ability to manage the situation.

    Reforms To Fix the Mess
    In 2021, Holly Fretwell and Jonathan Wood of PERC published Fix America’s Forests: Reforms to Restore National Forests, recommending means to address wildfire risks in California and across the country. To claims that the wildfire problem is overwhelmingly one of climate change, they respond that a “study led by Forest Service scientists estimated that of four factors driving fire severity in the western United States, live fuel ‘was the most important,’ accounting for 53 percent of average relative influence, while climate accounted for 14 percent.” Climate matters, but other policy choices matter more.

    Fretwell and Wood recommend restricting the scope of regulatory reviews that stands in the way of forest restoration, requiring that lawsuits against restoration projects be filed quickly, and excluding prescribed burns from carbon emissions calculations that can stand in the way of such projects.

    They also want to expand markets for construction materials, fuel pellets, and other products that can be made from trees removed while clearing potential fuel. That would make forest restoration profitable and allow it to be handled, at least in part, by private industry. I’ve written about such efforts before, including a promising effort in Northern Arizona.

    “There is broad agreement on the need for better forest management, but outdated policies and regulatory hurdles continue to delay critical restoration efforts,” Regan told me.

    If government officials finally take these hard-learned lessons to heart and ease the process of providing and storing water, restoring forests, and fighting fires, Californians might be spared from future disasters. They seem poised to work with the incoming Trump administration on exactly that. But reforms will come too late for those who have already lost lives, homes, and businesses.

    1. ‘They also want to expand markets for construction materials, fuel pellets, and other products that can be made from trees removed while clearing potential fuel. That would make forest restoration profitable and allow it to be handled, at least in part, by private industry. I’ve written about such efforts before, including a promising effort in Northern Arizona’

      The first shack I rented in Sedona was half pellet stove half electric waffle irons around the base of the floor. Sometimes the pellet stove would blow itself out – in the middle of the night – and the load bin was way too small. But I knew a guy in Flagstaff that had a big honking pellet stove that he could load 250 pounds into and he said no problems. It was like central air. It is pretty cheap fuel. A lot cheaper than firewood, which I used for many years in Flagstaff as the only heat. I had propane, but my first bill was 700 pesos for October, so I went full wood stove.

  29. ‘The Trudeau government argued over the years that high immigration would boost economic growth by counterbalancing aging demographics and filling job vacancies. McGill University associate economics professor Christopher Ragan said he opposed that philosophy while he served on Mr. Morneau’s economic growth council. ‘I think they didn’t think very well and smartly about growth,’ Prof. Ragan said. ‘And that led them down this hopeful and naive path that, ‘Oh, we’ll open the gates for immigration and that’ll be our growth strategy.’ And I think that has failed miserably’

    It was really this past US election and what’s going on in Europistan and K-da where this was finally rejected by majorities. This was the main thing globalist scum were counting on to save their biscuits. But it was always a lie. If illegals were a bonanza, Brownsville Texas would be the best economy in north America. Instead it’s county is dead last. That might have changed somewhat with Space X, but launching a few rocket-go-now isn’t going to change that much.

    1. ‘Oh, we’ll open the gates for immigration and that’ll be our growth strategy.’

      Nah, they just want to replace whites.

  30. ‘The reason the downturn has been more notable across the Mornington Peninsula is because it was one of those markets that really overshot growth through the pandemic period’

    The lending was sound Eliza. At the time.

  31. Oops: L.A. Sheriff Slips, Says ‘Depopulation Conversation Keeps Coming Up’

    by Adan Salazar
    January 13th, 2025 3:31 PM

    The sheriff of Los Angeles County turned heads with an apparent blunder over the weekend, saying that “depopulation” keeps cropping up in conversations regarding how soon displaced residents will be able to return to their most likely destroyed homes.

    The eyebrow-raising remark came during a press conference over the weekend, where Sheriff Robert G. Luna was discussing how residents have continuously been asking whether they can enter the disaster zone to see what remains of their belongings.

    “I know…a lot of our residents are trying to get back and they’re frustrated. I stopped by several checkpoints both in Altadena and Malibu yesterday. I personally listened to residents, ‘Please, please, let me back in.’ So I’m just going to say this. In driving around some of these areas they literally look like war zones. There are downed power poles, electric wires there are still some smoldering fires. It is not safe,” the sheriff said.

    “The minute it is safe, we understand the inconvenience, and every conversation we’re having about evacuations – that depopulation conversation is continuously coming up. We do care. We want to get you back into your homes but we can’t allow that until it is safe for you to do so.”

    It’s unclear what the sheriff intended to say and the department did not issue a statement clarifying the remarks; however, the comment is being highlighted online as a Freudian slip.

    Concerned Citizen
    @BGatesIsaPyscho
    “That De-Population conversation is coming up”

    Los Angeles Sheriff just said the quiet part out loud…..

    12:49 PM · Jan 13, 2025

    https://x.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/status/1878862017681141862

    1. Bonds
      10-year Treasury yield touches fresh 14-month high ahead of key inflation reports
      Published Mon, Jan 13 2025 6:24 AM EST
      Updated Mon, Jan 13 2025 4:06 PM EST
      Hakyung Kim
      Jenni Reid
      The 10-year Treasury yield touched a fresh 14-month high as investors looked ahead to key inflation prints.

      The yield on the 10-year Treasury was last up around 2 basis points at 4.79%, the highest level since Nov. 1, 2023. This followed the 10-year Treasury yield’s jump on Friday following a hotter-than-expected jobs report. The 2-year Treasury yield was marginally lower at 4.392%.

      https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/13/10-year-treasury-yield-rises-ahead-of-inflation-prints.html

      1. Yahoo Finance
        What 5% treasury yields mean for investors: Strategist explains
        Josh Lipton and Julie Hyman
        Mon, January 13, 2025 at 1:21 PM PST
        Treasury bond yields have been climbing higher, with markets widely concerned about the 10-year Treasury yield potentially exceeding 5%. RBC Capital Markets head of US equity strategy Lori Calvasina joins Market Domination to share her analysis.

        “It’s sort of just a big round scary psychological number, but you do need to dig a little deeper,” Calvasina explains, noting that if the 10-year Treasury yield breaks above 5%, “we’re going to be breaking above some important highs that were put in place prior to the financial crisis.”

        She points out that markets have primarily operated in a secular declining interest rate environment. However, rising yields would signal a shift toward a structurally rising rate environment. Regarding the relationship between earnings yield and PE yield, Calvasina observes that if this gap continues to widen “in a pretty significant way, it sort of hits people over the head with the idea that there is not a lot of value in the equity market relative to the bond market.”

        https://finance.yahoo.com/video/5-treasury-yields-mean-investors-212157980.html

      2. Now that Treasurys have CR8Red, would now potentially be a good time to buy the dip in bonds?
        Too worried about bail outs in CA and potentially FL.

        Hey, if CA is rescued from 25 years of poor management why shouldn’t FL be rescued.

      3. One chart shows why both stocks and bonds are tanking at the same time
        Matthew Fox
        Jan 13, 2025, 11:03 AM PST
        Stock trader studying
        Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images
        Both stocks and bonds are selling off right now, a shift from their past relationship.

        Until the past few weeks, stocks continued to climb to records as bond prices fell.

        Recently the S&P 500 earnings yield fell below the 10-year Treasury yield to a degree not seen since 2002.

        It’s getting increasingly difficult to find returns in the market as stock and bond prices fall simultaneously.

        https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/bonds/why-stocks-bonds-tanking-at-same-time-chart-earnings-yield-2025-1

    2. Markets
      Mortgage Rates Slightly Higher to Start New Week
      By: Matthew Graham
      Mon, Jan 13 2025, 4:15 PM

      Mortgage rates rose to the highest levels since May 2024 by the end of last week following a stronger reading on the jobs report. Technically, the same thing happened today, but only because rates inched just a bit higher from Friday’s latest levels.

      This time around, there wasn’t any big-ticket economic data to motivate movement and the minimal change could just as easily be seen as incidental or “almost sideways.”

      The more important consideration is the new round of potential volatility on the horizon. Whereas it was the jobs report last week, this week’s critical data will be Wednesday’s Consumer Price Index (CPI). Tomorrow’s inflation data (the Producer Price Index) is not quite as important, but a nonetheless capable of causing a reaction.

      If inflation comes in higher than expected, it could easily push rates even higher.

      The average lender is now up to 7.25% for a top tier conventional 30yr fixed scenario.

      https://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/markets/mortgage-rates-01132025

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *