skip to Main Content
thehousingbubble@gmail.com

Oh, Yeah, Why Would Houses Not Always Go Up By 10 Percent A Year?

A report from WFLA in Florida. “It happens after every hurricane. Developers and speculators swoop in, offering to buy storm-damaged homes, but what happens to homeowners if the buyer backs out? It happened to some Redington Beach homeowners. They thought they sealed the deal to sell their properties, but months later, they learned the investor was backing out. According to the contract, the buyer, Jason Matthews with 16 Redington Development offered cash and no contingences. Toray Leonard said Matthews’ broker told her they needed to kill the deal, citing market conditions. She said some of the other homeowners were offered a new deal but for less money. ‘Some of the people he’s gone back to have taken a 70% decrease in the offer,’ Leonard said. Leonard said she feels Matthews should at least return the escrow money used to seal the now broken deal. ‘Jason Matthew 16 Redington development, he wouldn’t even release the escrow that he put as a deposit,’ Leonard said.”

The Palm Beach Post in Florida. “A blacklist of Palm Beach County condominiums ineligible for Fannie Mae-backed mortgages has more than tripled over the past two years, according to a Miami law firm specializing in condo law. South Florida’s three southeast counties top the list for the most blacklisted buildings with Miami-Dade ranked first at 344, followed by Broward’s 242 and Palm Beach County’s 110. In May 2023, just 35 Palm Beach County buildings were on the list. ‘When the factual information does not qualify the community because it hasn’t kept reserves and hasn’t done the work, they want the information to change overnight,’ said Michael Gelfand, a West Palm Beach attorney who specializes in real estate and association law, noting that another key question for lenders is how many units are owner-occupied. Gelfand said the new rules and current costs to comply with them will be a bump in the road for many unit owners, however, some people will undoubtedly be unable to pay for expensive repairs.”

KXAN in Texas. “Home sales in the Austin metropolitan area are down 10% so far in 2025 compared to the first few months of 2024, according to the Austin Board of Realtors. ‘Homeowners during COVID accrued home equity gains above that which we would have otherwise expected,’ said Clare Knapp, housing economist at ABOR. “We’re also seeing perhaps a little bit of reluctance among sellers to meaningfully reduce their home prices, and I think that has contributed to some extent to that sluggishness in sales. It’s a very different market for buyers than it was even a few years ago during the pandemic, when buyers really didn’t have many options available to them, and we were just watching homes fly off the shelves,’ she continued. Even though prices are declining, Knapp said more needs to happen. While the median sales of a home in the metropolitan statistical area dropped 12% from 2022 to 2024, that value was 40% higher in 2024 than it was in 2019.”

The Arizona Republic. “Home sales were up by more than 1,000 to 6,790 in March, according to the Arizona Regional Multiple Listing Service. Homeowners listed 11,163 houses in March, more than any month in several years. Total Valley home listings climbed to 24,709 in March, the highest overall inventory of listings in several years. ‘We are in a buyers’ market because of rising supply,’ said Tina Tamboer, a senior housing analyst with The Cromford Report. ‘For sellers, that means concessions, concessions, concessions.'”

Westword in Colorado. “According to the a recent market trends report from the Denver Metro Association of Realtors Market, the median sale price in metro Denver rose 38.5 percent from March 2020 to April 2022, to $616,500. By March of this year, the median sale price had dropped to $599,000 indicating Denver’s residential real estate is not as hot as it once was. In fact, Denver had one of the highest jumps in inventory nationwide between February and March 2025 and is the thirteenth most friendly market to buyers right now, according to DMAR, while Colorado Springs ranks fifth and Boulder ranks tenth.”

“According to Andrew Abrams, a Guide Real Estate broker and DMAR market trends committee member, the large uptick in inventory this March is a return to normal. ‘Everyone has a relatively short memory, so as things had sped up and we had historically low inventory. That felt normal, and it was like, ‘Oh, yeah, why would houses not always go up by 10 percent a year?’ Abrams says. ‘Right now, when we’re seeing more properties on the market, — I’ve heard from not just clients, but people who are seeing a lot of signs out there or seeing them last a lot longer — that adjustment feels new, but it’s actually much more historically normal than what we had seen during those three years of really intense appreciation.’ Abrams says buyers should also not compromise too much on inspection items. ‘That’s where buyers in this market can really make sure that they’re getting what they need to feel comfortable moving in on day one, where, in the past, sellers would say, ‘Well, we have three other buyers lined up,’ he says.”

Axios on California. “Before Peter Navarro designed trade wars for President Trump, he orchestrated housing wars in San Diego across five unsuccessful bids for local office. Navarro, then a UC Irvine economics professor, led San Diego’s slow-growth movement in the 1990s, drawing battle lines that still define today’s development fights. He called for a moratorium on housing until the city could provide adequate services, increased fees on new development, and tied housing permits to new police hires. That campaign also proposed limiting immigration into the city to control population growth and ease the strain on housing.”

“Bill Fulton, the former head of San Diego planning who chronicled southern California urban growth politics in ‘Reluctant Metropolis,’ wrote that Navarro would have been a seminal figure in regional urban planning history if he had won that mayoral race. That era of slow-growthers, Fulton wrote, shared Trump’s view of trade: ‘More development creates losers as well as winners, so you’d better box out the bad development or at least make those developers pay through the nose.'”

“In his political tell-all for the San Diego Reader, Navarro argued that developers, without the tight planning controls he championed, ‘will leave air pollution, overcrowded schools, underpoliced streets, sewer systems bursting at their seams, and traffic jams that can (and often do in California) make grown men cry.’ One prescription was for developers to pay for all libraries, parks, roads, sewage systems, etc. ‘at the same time as the houses — not five years later (or never) like most of these punks in pinstripes prefer.'”

The Center Square. “With Illinois now being home to the ninth highest home foreclosure rates in the country, Republican state Sen. Martin McLaughlin traces the state’s growing housing struggles back to the doorsteps of the capitol in Springfield. McLaughlin argues there’s a good reason why Democrats in Springfield are slow to address the issue. ‘Growing moving companies and U-Hauls by people moving out of Illinois is also another category that we’re leading in and one that’s not positive for the future of Illinois families. They’re not acknowledging the situation because if they do, they have to own it,’ he said. ‘If they acknowledge what their policies have done, they have to own it and right now Gov. Pritzker and many of the progressives do not want these results being attributed to them and their policies. When a person makes a decision to allow their home to go into foreclosure, it’s not a decision they make lightly. It means that there’s no hope to recover. It is pretty much the last recourse.'”

The Olympian in Washington. “The Olympia Planning Commission has had two public hearings regarding code amendments aimed at relaxing commercial development requirements and increasing housing density in an area that already has more than 800 housing units and only a handful of nearby amenities. When the plan for Briggs Village was adopted more than 20 years ago, residents were promised a grocery store would be built in the ‘urban village’ neighborhood. Now, at the property developer’s request, the city is considering relaxing requirements around the size of a grocery store, and some worry the changes will mean no store will ever fill that space. Lahela Peterson lives in Briggs Village. She said the amendments will lead to ‘a glut of market-rate apartments that cost more than what I’m paying for my monthly mortgage and property taxes.”

From Bloomberg. “This spring was widely expected to be when the Canadian housing market finally perked up after nearly three years of weak sales. But then came US President Donald Trump’s tariff demands. Canadian housing markets tanked in March as the trade battles heated up. Nationwide, sales slumped about 9.3% from a year earlier, the lowest for the month since 2009, according to the Canadian Real Estate Association. Transactions plunged nearly 17% in Calgary and 24% in the Toronto area. And in Vancouver, sales tumbled 13%. Eric Struk, a 23-year-old YouTube travel blogger in Toronto, said Trump’s tariff blitz has now caused him to delay his hunt for a two-bedroom condo he had been thinking about for the past six months.”

“With advertising revenue from his videos already dropping, the extra C$1,600 ($1,150) a month he’d have to pay on a mortgage over what he currently pays in rent has grown more unappealing. And though he already has the down payment he’d need, he fears the economy could get worse, and any property bought today might just drop in value tomorrow. ‘It’s not even just the stress of potentially getting a mortgage, it’s the stress of the uncertainty,’ Struk said. ‘Who knows what’s going to happen? Especially with Trump.'”

“In some ways, conditions are still more enticing than they were in recent years. Home prices are down nearly 16% from three years ago, inventories are building and borrowing costs are at the lowest in nearly three years. But the mounting uncertainty threatens to overpower some of those benefits. ‘It doesn’t matter that rates are dropping if you think you’re going to be out of a job,’ said Adil Dinani, a real estate broker in Vancouver. ‘You’re not going to buy real estate.’ ‘The market is extremely bad right now,’ said Brooke Hicks, a real estate broker in the city of Hamilton, a market outside Toronto where steel manufacturers are a major employer. ‘It’s almost weird being an agent because it’s so slow.'”

ABC News in Australia. “Harry Jang is a 24-year-old ACT resident, who’s hoping to buy his first home soon — a one or two-bedroom apartment. So, when the two major parties launched their big housing policies on the weekend, he was watching closely. Harry is interested in Labor’s idea to allow all Australians to buy their first home with a 5 per cent deposit. ‘My concern is whether the expansion to everybody, all first home buyers, whether that will increase housing prices,’ he said. He has a similar question about the Coalition plan to allow first homebuyers to deduct mortgage interest payments from their tax for five years. ‘If it increases demand, does that put more money into the pocket of some other person who I’m competing against?'”

“For other young Australians, there’s a lot they didn’t see in the weekend’s announcements. Jessica Broad is a 27-year-old Victorian and wants to see tax reform back on the agenda, specifically negative gearing, which Labor took to the 2019 election (and lost). ‘Limit the amount of investment properties one person can own. Straight off the bat,’ she said. ‘I kind of get why it’s in place, but it’s just sucking the wealth from the middle class to the wealthy class.'”

“Jemma Myors from NSW has just bought her first home — an apartment — in her mid-forties. She also says it’s time to revisit tax breaks for investors. ‘I think negative gearing needs to go, but I also feel like none of our current crop of politicians is willing to engage with that. I mean, after what happened to Bill Shorten — and he was only going to very lightly touch that issue — nobody’s going to go there.’ They also want to see action on barriers like planning restrictions on urban density, and stamp duty. ‘To be frank, it seems like a butt tonne of money that I have to find to pay to the government so that I can live in somewhere that I own, as opposed to somewhere that I rent,’ Jemma said.”

This Post Has 116 Comments
  1. ‘Some of the people he’s gone back to have taken a 70% decrease in the offer…Jason Matthew 16 Redington development, he wouldn’t even release the escrow that he put as a deposit’

    I have mentioned the cut throat nature of Florida developers would appear.

    1. well if it ain’t in the contract, it doesn’t matter. It isn’t getting returned unless it’s specifically in the contract. (not like a Realtor is gonna help you)

      I swear nobody reads the contract for the biggest asset they own.

      1. They aren’t, but if the deal is broken the idea is that the seller’s get the escrow money for their time/pain/suffering/place off the market/etc.

  2. ‘Total Valley home listings climbed to 24,709 in March, the highest overall inventory of listings in several years. ‘We are in a buyers’ market because of rising supply…For sellers, that means concessions, concessions, concessions’

    Wa happened to my shortage Tina?

  3. ‘Everyone has a relatively short memory, so as things had sped up and we had historically low inventory. That felt normal, and it was like, ‘Oh, yeah, why would houses not always go up by 10 percent a year?’

    10% is bat sh$t crazy Andy, but I remember it was more like 20% in yer sh$thole, or even 50% a year in Boise at one point. That went on for at least 2 years. Jerry knew, and as I’ve said he and the rest of the central bankers were purposefully trying to create the crash were are now seeing.

    Isn’t it interesting that appraisers signed off on this all across the US, at the same time?

    1. “Isn’t it interesting that appraisers signed off on this all across the US, at the same time?”

      Appraisers who play the game get paid. Those who don’t get to starve.

      1. Also, lenders who select appraisers who are willing to play the game get to collect fees. Those lenders who aren’t willing get to starve.

        The incentives are skewed.

      2. It’s always been this way. Appraisals as we know it should be abolished. Have AI do the valuation based on comps and just send someone to verify the house actually exists, which can be accomplished with a home inspection. Having worked in an appraisal shop you’d be blown away how they creatively bend the numbers.

        1. Every single house I’ve purchased or been involved with the appraisal has come back at EXACTLY the agreed upon price.
          every time
          to the dollar

          They clearly start at the price and work backwards to justify the price. It’s just a giant “check the box” where nothing is actually protected or accomplished.

    2. “…he and the rest of the central bankers were purposefully trying to create the crash were are now seeing.”

      Why?

      1. I can only guess. But it should be pointed out that he joined a flurry of central bankers and WEF stooges saying in unison ‘we’re never going back to normal.’

        What the hell did that mean? I have no idea. Wearing mouth hankeys, standing in lines 6 feet apart and seeing guberment ads 24/7 for experimental gene therapy injections? House arrest for the world.

        But I do know this. When I first saw Albuquerque shack prices were up 30% in a year, I immediately said, they are trying to crash the shack market. These markets will not hold these prices, and they aren’t.

        It’s true the WEF is a shell of it’s former ‘you’ll own nothing and like it’ arrogance. Jerry and the rest of the globalist scum were probably planning something similar.

        1. There is a natural credit cycle that has existed for ages. My take on it is they understand that and they also know that the system is inherently flawed to the point that it will fail without a regular reset where they sweep a bunch of bad debt under the rug all at once. Why not juice it up at the end of the cycle and make it so bad that everyone will go along with ‘foaming the runway for the banks’? It’s like lambs to a slaughter for them. Get in tune with the cycle and it’s like clockwork but the clock is very slow so you have to be patient.

  4. SEMAFOR – Fed resists pressure to rescue Treasury market.

    https://archive.ph/yloJF#selection-891.0-891.46

    The Federal Reserve is resisting pressure from the White House and Washington to spur big banks to buy more Treasury bonds, a reluctance that could further shake an unnerved market for US debt.

    Wild swings in Treasury prices forced President Donald Trump to reverse course on his sweeping tariffs, and investors remain spooked even after his backtrack. Higher yields on government bonds are a sign of stress and eroding faith in the American government to pay its bills.

    [A chart appears here …]

    Still, the Fed isn’t accelerating regulatory changes that would encourage banks to load up on government debt, people familiar with the matter said, even though Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon both support the idea. Tweaks to rules that currently penalize banks for holding big slugs of Treasury bonds are instead winding their way through a painstaking internal process that could take months, the people said.

    “These rules effectively discourage banks from acting as intermediaries in the financial markets – and this would be particularly painful at precisely the wrong time: when markets get volatile,” Dimon wrote in his annual letter published last week.

    Tweaking them could bring billions of dollars of buying firepower into a market full of sellers. Boston Fed President Susan Collins told the Financial Times last week that the central bank was “absolutely” prepared to intervene if necessary, remarks that some investors saw as proof the Fed was ready to step in.

    The Fed has been working on a proposal since February but has no plans to rush out a final rule, in part because it’s wary of being seen as panicking — or worse, bailing out the administration or hedge funds that have been heavy sellers. The current plan is to float the changes later this spring or summer through the normal regulatory process, the people said.

    There’s no sign that the Treasury market is broken, as trading has been orderly and auctions of fresh bonds have gone well. But investors demanding higher yields to lend to the US government is a worrying sign and makes other types of borrowing, like mortgages and car loans, more expensive.

    Know More

    “The safest asset in the country, US Treasurys, are not treated as such,” Bessent said at the Economic Club of New York last month. “I’m not here today making a specific policy announcement, only to make the point that rigorous analysis must be applied to these regulations.”

    Michelle Bowman, the Fed’s vice chair of supervision, has also called for easing regulations on banks’ ability to own Treasury bonds, as have some congressional Republicans.

    Liz’s view

    Stepping in would be politically dicey. One likely cause of the bond selloff is hedge funds unwinding popular Treasury trades, and direct intervention by the Fed would invite criticism that it is bailing out Wall Street. The Fed could buy Treasury bonds itself, but has been shrinking its holdings since 2022 and is reluctant to grow its balance sheet.

    That leaves big banks as the obvious knife-catchers. And it would seemingly cost the Fed little to move up a change it plans to make eventually. But there is a queasy circular illogic in the central bank declaring US Treasury bonds a risk-free asset at the exact moment the market has decided they aren’t.

    1. Regarding risk levels of US Treasury bonds, I can’t believe more people aren’t talking about this Stephen Miran guy, Trump’s new Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers. He is advocating “restructuring” of long Treasury bonds to extend their maturity to 100 years. That is a polite term for DEFAULT. I posted a Marketwatch link about this a few days ago.

      1. anybody dumb enough to buy 30 year bonds at 4% much less 100 year bonds at whatever interest rate deserves anything they get.
        Do stupid things, win stupid prizes.

        1. I don’t think he’s saying to issue new 100 year bonds. It’s worse than that. He’s saying restructure existing, outstanding 10, 20, 30 year bonds to 100 year maturities against the wishes of the bondholders. That is a default, plain and simple.

          1. That is a default, plain and simple.
            One economist also said, just make everyone take a haircut on their US Bonds. Say, just pay (I am just making up as he didn’t give numbers) 80 cents on the dollar when they come due.

      2. “…extend their maturity to 100 years….”

        forever [100 years] is a mighty long time. {apologies to Prince}

        Why not go with 1000 years? {the North and South poles should have reversed by then}

          1. I like both of these suggestions!
            My grandchildren (7 soon to be 8) and my great grandchildren (2) approve these messages.

  5. https://hotair.com/john-s-2/2025/04/15/new-york-ag-letitia-james-gets-criminal-referral-for-possible-mortgage-fraud-n3801834

    “claiming a home is your primary residence could be an attempt to get a lower rate from the bank and if you had no intention of actually moving there full time, that would be fraud.”

    From what I know from reading this blog over the years, that’s just about the most common housing-related fraud in the book. Everyone who’s done it should go to jail, or at least be fined for the difference in mortgage rates.

    1. Federal Reserve Bank Philadelphia: Owner-Occupancy Fraud and Mortgage Performance (January 2023)

      Abstract
      We identify occupancy fraud — borrowers who misrepresent their occupancy status as owner-occupants rather than investors — in residential mortgage originations. Unlike previous work, we show that fraud was prevalent in originations not just during the housing bubble, but also persists through more recent times. We also demonstrate that fraud is broad-based and appears in government-sponsored enterprise and bank portfolio loans, not just in private securitization; these fraudulent borrowers make up one-third of the effective investor population. Occupancy fraud allows riskier borrowers to obtain credit at lower interest rates. These fraudulent
      borrowers perform substantially worse than similar declared investors, defaulting at a 75 percent higher rate. Their defaults are also likelier to be “strategic,” suggesting that they pose a risk in the face of declining house prices.

      1. Have you ever heard of an originator or a homebuyer getting busted for occupancy fraud? That’s part of the problem. And I can tell you is that one of the first things that will come out of an originators mouth is “We’ll just call it your primary residence.”

        1. Hell, Our county Sheriff lied about his residency to have 2 homeowners exemptions. He is the darling of the RINO’s here.

  6. Conservatives celebrate after Trump admin refers NY AG Letitia James for potential prosecution: ‘Karma’

    Droves of conservatives relished at the prospect of New York’s Attorney General Letitia James having to “eat her own words” after the Trump administration referred her for potential federal prosecution over alleged mortgage fraud.

    Critics quickly seized on James’ own declaration that “no one is above the law” after news broke Tuesday that she had been hit with a criminal referral for committing alleged financial fraud to secure her own favorable property loans.

    James blasted out the now-infamous phrase when her office opted to target the Trump Organization for over-inflating the values of many of its properties in a civil fraud trial that ended with a $454 million judgment.

    Republican lawmakers and conservative commentators were quick to boast that “karma” was now coming for the AG — gloating that “the tables have now turned.”

    “No one is above the law!” New York congresswoman Elise Stefanik blasted out on X.

    Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton added: “Letitia James engaged in some of the most shameful, partisan lawfare against President Trump — based on far less evidence than this.”

    “These allegations must be investigated thoroughly,” Indiana Sen. Jim Banks declared.

    And Missouri Sen. Eric Schmitt mocked the AG’s prior remarks, tweeting: “Something, something… no one is above the law.”

    A slew of right-leaning commentators also piled on, with Jonathan Turley — a legal expert and Post columnist — saying “the irony is crushing.”

    “She previously prosecuted Trump for everything short of ripping a label off a mattress. She emphasized that Trump was ultimately responsible for any filings made in his name or that of his company,” he wrote in an X post.

    “The greatest danger for Letitia James may be if the Letitia James standard is applied to her case. She emphasized that such technicalities matter and that the powerful should not be given a free pass under these laws.”

    Outkick founder Clay Travis also chimed in, posting: “New York AG Letitia James being prosecuted for lying about her assets to get a mortgage after prosecuting Trump for lying about his assets to get a bank loan would be too perfect. They always accuse you of what they actually did.”

    The gleeful reaction came just hours after Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director William Pulte sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy AG Todd Blanche, alleging that James had “falsified records” to get home loans for a Virginia property she claimed as her “principal residence” in 2023.

    The alleged offense unfolded in late August 2023 — just weeks before James began her civil fraud trial against President Trump’s business.

    “Ms. James was the sitting Attorney General of New York and is required by law to have her primary residence in the state of New York — even though her mortgage applications list her intent to have the Norfolk, VA, property as her primary home,” the letter stated.

    “It appears Ms. James’ property and mortgage-related misrepresentations may have continued to her recent 2023 Norfolk, VA property purchase in order to secure a lower interest rate and more favorable loan terms.”

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/16/us-news/conservatives-gloat-after-trump-admin-refers-ny-ag-letitia-james-for-potential-prosecution/

    1. In February 2001, James also purchased a five-family dwelling in Brooklyn — but has “consistently misrepresented the same property as only having four units in both building permit applications and numerous mortgage documents and applications,” the letter noted.

      Pulte attached several documents also showing that James purchased another property with her father as a co-signer — but falsely listed the pair as “husband and wife” in 1983 and 2000.

      “While this was a long time ago, it raises serious concerns about the validity of Ms. James’ representations on mortgage applications,” he wrote.

      Loans secured for the latter property could have reduced her mortgage interest rate by as much as 1% and had lower monthly payments under the federal Home Affordable Modification Program since it was listed as containing just four units, according to Pulte.

      “Ms. James, for both properties listed above, appears to have falsified records in order to meet certain lending requirements and receive favorable loan terms,” he told Bondi and Blanche.

      That could amount to criminal charges, including wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud and false statements to a financial institution, among others, Pulte added.

      The documents Pulte included in his criminal referral “are quite damning,” George Washington University law professor and Post columnist Jonathan Turley told Fox News host Laura Ingraham Tuesday night.

      “These are misleading statements,” he said on “The Ingraham Angle.” “Either it’s your principal residence or it’s not. Either you’re married to your father or he’s your father.”

      “As for James, if we apply the Letitia James standard that she created, there’d be little question here. This seems pretty straightforward.”

      James professed, “Make no mistake: No one is above the law, not even the president,” when she launched her investigation into the Trump Organization in July 2019.

      “No one is above the law” became a refrain of sorts for James throughout the Trump case.

      https://nypost.com/2025/04/15/us-news/trump-administration-refers-ny-ag-tish-james-for-prosecution/

  7. WSJ Opinion – Time for Accountability on the Covid Lab-Leak Coverup.

    Fauci misled Congress when he denied the NIH funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan.

    https://archive.ph/cZb63#selection-2479.0-2483.87

    The Biden administration unlawfully hid a 2022 report revealing that seven U.S. service members likely contracted Covid-19 at the World Military Games in Wuhan, China, in October 2019—months before the World Health Organization declared a global pandemic in March 2020, the Washington Free Beacon reported last week. In February, researchers at the infamous Wuhan Institute of Virology announced the discovery of a new bat coronavirus that closely resembles Covid. Markets dipped.

    Americans are right to be concerned. After the 2020 pandemic, our scientific elite—personified by Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases from 1984 to 2022—should have come clean about the pandemic’s laboratory origin, admitted the Wuhan lab’s risky gain-of-function research was a giant mistake that cost millions of lives, canceled funding and partnerships with China, and rallied global health authorities to drive higher safety standards and a worldwide ban on suicidal virus experimentation.

    None of that happened. Instead, the Chinese Communist Party was permitted to bleach the crime scene, as Dr. Fauci—along with a cabal of Wuhan Institute collaborators and National Institutes of Health grantees—whitewashed history by insisting for years that the most likely origin of the virus was natural. Dr. Fauci reiterated this claim in a paper published this past November.

    Millions dead, billions in economic value lost, and the West can claim zero lessons learned. Dr. Fauci and his supporters, with help from Joe Biden and blue-state Covid tyrants, so sabotaged Americans’ faith in public health and academic and civic institutions that we are less prepared to confront the next virus than the last one.

    Only once we know in detail what happened and who was at fault can we take steps to prevent the next crisis, restore faith in American institutions, and hold the Chinese Communist Party accountable. Here’s a plan for doing so.

    President Trump should declassify all intelligence on Covid’s origin. In 2023 Congress voted unanimously to require that Mr. Biden declassify “any and all” relevant intelligence surrounding Covid’s origins. Mr. Biden promptly flouted both the intention and the letter of the law by publishing a semiredacted 10-page report that read more like a summary of publicly available information than a comprehensive accounting of what our intelligence agencies knew about this virus.

    Western intelligence agencies initially bowed to political pressure and rejected the theory that Covid emerged from the Wuhan lab. They now favor that view, and most Americans agree. But the details matter. Canadian molecular biologist Alina Chan, who refused to discredit the lab-leak theory even amid Chinese propaganda and Dr. Fauci’s obfuscations, would be a perfect candidate to lead a commission to develop laboratory safety standards for working with dangerous pathogens. Lab leaks are shockingly common. In 2004 there were at least two documented leaks of the SARS virus from a top Beijing lab. We can’t afford to allow scientists working with dangerous pathogens in major population centers to police themselves.

    Mr. Trump should empower agency heads to drive this accountability push. Central Intelligence Agency Director John Ratcliffe has taken the lead in reassessing the origins of the pandemic, but a full-scale investigation should involve multiple departments. Attorney General Pam Bondi should issue subpoenas for communications between Dr. Fauci, Francis Collins, Ralph Baric, Peter Daszak, the EcoHealth Alliance, the authors of the disgraced “proximal origin” article that claimed to disprove the lab-leak theory, and others in Dr. Fauci’s circle who helped hide the truth or worked to censor opposing hypotheses. Any institution that employs these misinformation merchants should be cut off from federal grants.

    In 2014 the U.S. paused federal funding for gain-of-function research over concerns about safety risks. The moratorium was lifted in 2017, but Mr. Trump should immediately reimpose it. Secretary of State Marco Rubio should also investigate which international bodies or agreements—perhaps the U.S.-China Agreement on Cooperation in Science and Technology—enabled the lab leak and its coverup.

    Finally, Mr. Trump should establish a multination tribunal, akin to the International Criminal Court but with actual teeth, to investigate the origins of the virus, examining evidence of negligence or intentional misconduct and determining the culpability of key people and institutions.

    The American elite’s feckless response to Covid’s origin is fertilizer for the next crisis—which we shouldn’t assume will be limited to public health. The Chinese Communist Party has reason to believe that even when it causes a global calamity, American CEOs will still jet to Beijing to glad-hand with Politburo members, American university administrators will continue to accept money from Chinese sources, and international governance bodies like the World Health Organization will turn a blind eye. If there are no consequences for a pandemic that killed millions, who will raise a fuss over Chinese incursions into Taiwan?

    The American media and scientific elite have given us a few mealy-mouthed half-apologies. They want us to move on. We should refuse. Our friends and loved ones died alone and afraid in hospitals. Our children were locked out of schools. Our churches were closed. Institutional trust can’t be restored without accountability.

    The Biden administration resisted accountability. While shuffling out of the White House, Mr. Biden took the extraordinary step of issuing Dr. Fauci a pardon, even though he hadn’t been charged with a crime. Congress should investigate this disgraceful action—which tacitly admitted Mr. Fauci’s wrongdoing—and call Mr. Fauci to testify before the body once again given he can no longer invoke the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

    At best, Dr. Fauci misled Congress when he insisted that the NIH wasn’t funding gain-of-function research in the Wuhan lab. At worst, that research sparked the pandemic with U.S. funding. These scientists weren’t merely wrong; they locked shields to hide what we now know to be the truth. Those who advocated censorship of the lab-leak hypothesis should never see another federal dollar.

    The question of how this pandemic began remains the most important in the world. The Trump administration can deliver answers, hold people accountable, and ensure the world learns from its mistakes to prevent a future crisis.

  8. Man accused of trying to kill Josh Shapiro lost his home, tried suicide, was melting down

    There was a time in Cody Balmer’s life where, from the outside, you might say things were on an even keel.

    He was a married home-owner, working full-time as an auto mechanic at a well-regarded shop, and a fixture at his kid’s youth sports events.

    “Always seemed like a hard-working family man,” one casual acquaintance from those days told PennLive Monday afternoon, as everyone looked for causal clues to why Balmer would have drawn up and executed a scheme to firebomb the Governor’s Residence in Harrisburg early Sunday morning.

    The 38-year-old, who surrendered to police later Sunday, was arraigned Monday afternoon on attempted homicide and other counts stemming from the arson attack that caused a rushed evacuation of Gov. Josh Shapiro and his family, and left major damage to several public areas of the residence.

    But Balmer’s paper trail of mortgage foreclosures, custody fights and lower-level brushes with the law — and at one point, even an attempted suicide — also paint a picture of a guy for whom life appeared to be melting down.

    Balmer was charged in February 2015 with two counts of forgery after obtaining and altering a paycheck meant for a Royer’s Flowers employee and trying to cash it as his own. It was not immediately clear how Balmer got possession of the check, but he pleaded guilty and was ordered to serve 18 months probation.

    After that, Balmer had little public record of trouble until 2022, when the financing company holding the mortgage on his Canby Street home in Penbrook moved to foreclose.

    Other posts insinuated Balmer felt let down by society.

    “Take the day off from being the bigger person and choose violence, you deserve it,” said a post that Balmer reposted to his account on June 29, 2021.

    In 2022, around the time foreclosure proceedings had begun on the Canby Street house, Balmer wrote on Facebook:

    “Can’t pay rent? Sell your f—— organs! No more organs? F—— die then this is America be grateful for the opportunity you had.”

    Balmer found a buyer willing to pay $60,000 for the home, but while awaiting his lender’s approval to accept the sale for less than the amount Balmer still owed on the property – what’s known as a “short sale.”

    It meant that Balmer walked away debt-free, but with no real assets either.

    He has spent about a year now living with his parents.

    Christie said her son has not been taking his medications prescribed for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder recently. And his mental detachment was hard to miss, she said. “He was talking about demons, and that he was clairvoyant,” Mrs. Balmer said. “He told us that he ate a battery.”

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/man-accused-of-trying-to-kill-josh-shapiro-lost-his-home-tried-suicide-was-melting-down/ar-AA1CWTyr

    1. and then we have. our murderer. grifting and released on bond…..because of……

      Initially, he was being held on a $1 million bond until a Collin County judge slashed it to $250K and ruled that he may await trial at home with an ankle monitor under 24-hour supervision from his parents or an “adult designee.”

      https://nypost.com/2025/04/16/us-news/karmelo-anthony-renting-900k-home-in-gated-community-with-family-bought-new-car-after-release-on-bond-in-austin-metcalf-murder-case-report/

      1. I think he will be convicted, but only serve for a few years. And will be rich when he is released, unless his family burns through the gofundme loot while he’s in the smaller.

      2. With these insane prices you have to get creative to be a winnah!

        As someone on X pointed out, this thing smells like someone is trying to gin up another summer of love.

        1. We know they are preparing for another round of “mostly peaceful” protests. Probably when the stabbing murderer is convicted.

    1. Has that house been flooded? The floors are all destroyed.

      The house is concrete block so it might be worthwhile to rehab instead of tearing down. But not in that neighborhood. You had to put $150K into it to even be passable, and then what? You have a $300K house on a street of $150-200K houses.

  9. Elon Musk, DOGE, and the Federal Hiring Freeze Have Upended the Careers of Young People

    In the fall, as she was interviewing at the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Elizabeth Rauenhorst, a senior at Georgetown University, asked if the incoming Trump administration could jeopardize the position she was applying for.

    The interviewer assured her that because of USAID’s bipartisan support, nothing would change. Rauenhorst was thrilled to receive a tentative offer, pending her background check, in December, and had a January start date. She never started that internship, though, and now the entire agency she hoped to work for is effectively defunct.

    Rauenhorst is one of many graduating seniors whose post-grad plans have been disrupted by the Trump administration’s efforts to drastically shrink the federal government. As President Trump seeks to dismantle whole agencies, college seniors have been terminated from internships that had the potential to become full-time roles. Others have had job offers rescinded after the administration froze hiring across the federal government.

    Some of these students spent their entire college career preparing for a life of public service, while others didn’t realize the roles they were applying for fell under a federal agency’s jurisdiction. All of them are deeply uncertain and anxious about graduating into a market that is flooded with job seekers.

    This fear is acute at schools like Georgetown, where the rate of students entering the federal government is particularly high. When the hiring freeze went into effect, the career center launched a series of listening sessions and seminars aimed at helping students pivot their plans. Despite the help, though, many seniors can’t shake the anxiety and disappointment. “It’s a bummer. It’s a sad time to be a graduate student or a graduating student who wants to work in this field,” Rauenhorst says, reflecting on her interest in international development work.

    Eric is one of those young people now considering a pivot to the private sector. (He asked to use a pseudonym because USAID employees have been instructed by email not to speak to the media.) Now a senior, he applied to Georgetown hoping to use his experience and interests to pursue a “dream career” in foreign policy. After completing a number of internships, primarily at nonprofits and think tanks, he was offered an internship at USAID starting in December that had the potential to become a full-time position after graduation.

    Eric enjoyed his first month of work with the agency, describing his days as filled with “potential learning.” But after Trump was sworn in, the agency drastically changed as the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk, took an axe to it. Eric watched as contractors were furloughed, and his work trickled to a halt. “I was literally just refreshing my email all the time, waiting to be eventually kicked out of it, because I knew it was coming,” he recalls. Eric was ultimately placed on administrative leave along with most of USAID’s staff.

    He says he can’t help feeling that he’s been preparing for a career that is now in danger of extinction: “It’s hard for me to imagine that some of these careers might just not exist, right? If there’s no USAID, then maybe there won’t be significant careers in public service in international development,” he says. “Did I make a mistake by choosing to study what I studied?”

    Komal Samrow, who’s had her “heart set on” doing public service work, agrees: Thinking about the future has now become “disheartening.”

    Last summer, she interned at the Government Accountability Office (GAO). It was a “dream internship,” she says. On her last day she received a conditional job offer for after graduation. But as layoffs and buyouts began sweeping the federal workforce after President Trump took office, she assumed the offer no longer existed.

    Samrow grew up in a family that deeply values service. She says her grandfather served in the Indian Foreign Service, her father works for UNICEF, and she had hoped to follow in their footsteps. “I want to do something that feels meaningful. Then to pour everything into that since freshman year, interning for nonprofits, for international organizations, for GAO — that was all because this is something that I believe in,” she says. “And then to almost feel punished for it?”

    As graduation creeps closer, it’s been difficult for Samrow to see the certainty her peers with business and consulting job offers are experiencing, especially because she knows she willingly sacrificed that certainty for her commitment to public service. “I’ve been grappling with this sort of anger that I don’t even know how to articulate sometimes,” she says. “Because, I’m like, this is something I chose for myself. But it’s not that I didn’t put in the effort, it’s not that I didn’t put in the work, it’s not that I didn’t care — it’s that it’s literally been taken away from me.”

    When Sara Pizzini, a senior at Georgetown and a psychology major, first heard about the hiring freeze, she didn’t think it would affect her. In December, she applied for a fellowship at the National Institutes of Health; she interviewed with three separate labs. After she received a second-round interview at one lab, the federal hiring freeze went into effect and her hiring process slowed down. Pizzini then got an email saying the program had been “paused.” She’s trying to figure out something else, but at this time, she says, the uncertainty, “honestly, feels really bad.”

    Recently she met with an advisor who encouraged her to pursue opportunities outside the research space: “She’s like, ‘You should get a real job,’” Pizzini recalls, her voice cracking. “And I was just like, ‘That goes against everything that I stand for.”

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/careers/elon-musk-doge-and-the-federal-hiring-freeze-have-upended-the-careers-of-young-people/ar-AA1CTWIP

    1. “She’s like, ‘You should get a real job,’” Pizzini recalls, her voice cracking. “And I was just like, ‘That goes against everything that I stand for”

      You deserve everything inflicted on the Purebloods in 2021-2022, and worse. National Institutes of Health? You are complicit in medical genocide.

      OnlyFans if you’re lucky. Plan B is svcking **** to pay for rent and groceries.

      1. “She’s like, ‘You should get a real job,’” Pizzini recalls, her voice cracking. “And I was just like, ‘That goes against everything that I stand for.”
        That is one of the funniest things I have ever read. A real job is against everything I stand for?? WTF? How rich are her parents/family?

        1. Well, Chelsea Clinton has never had a real job, and she’s a multi-millionaire. No doubt she is an expert investor, just like her mother.

        2. [I hope that yous guys at HBB don’t mind if I get some info from ChatGPT. I just take the really relevant hard information and/or summarize what it told me.]

          Yearly tuition at Georgetown: $68K (without room and board)
          Estimated total cost including room board books etc: $93,600.
          “Georgetown is committed to meeting the full financial needs for all eligible students.”

          These public service people must come from family money, or at least family connections. Little Princess going into public service — especially when it involves world travel ⛩️🗼🛕– is what their virtue-signaling mothers brag about at cocktail parties. A real job is what Jose and Maria do.

          1. is what their virtue-signaling mothers brag about at cocktail parties. A real job is what Jose and Maria do.
            You might be right, but it is a totally different world than I know.

          2. But “Some of these students spent their entire college career preparing for a life of public service.” It’s all so absurd, a 4 year ‘career’ at a very comfortable luxury school and we’re supposed to feel bad for them? Seriously? Get wrecked.

    2. Elon Musk, DOGE, and the Federal Hiring Freeze Have Upended the Careers of Young People

      There it is again, the sense of entitlement, that people should be heavily taxed and trillions be borrowed so that they can have their “dream jobs”. They spend years studying BS majors and expect to land high paying gigs. I recall reading that all those numbskulls majoring in victim studies were expecting six figure salaries upon graduation.

    3. What constantly annoys me is how entitled these people are to think taxpayers should pay for their dream of “helping people.” It’s like it’s never occurred to them to take a regular job and use their free time to volunteer. Do they ever think of tutoring a kid whose school isn’t teaching him to read?

      I like Jordan Peterson’s suggestion to “first clean your room” before trying to fix the world. I bet many of these people have families, neighborhoods, and towns that could use their free help.

    4. ‘It’s hard for me to imagine that some of these careers might just not exist, right? If there’s no USAID, then maybe there won’t be significant careers in public service in international development,” he says. “Did I make a mistake by choosing to study what I studied?’

      Magic 8 ball says Yes Eric.

  10. Chinese factories appeal directly to US consumers on TikTok as tariffs bite

    Chinese factories are trying to sell directly to American consumers on social media platforms in a bid to bypass the 145 per cent tariff hike imposed on Chinese products by US President Donald Trump.

    From furniture and appliances to laundry pods and home decors, a growing number of Chinese sellers are showcasing their products in English on platforms like TikTok and Rednote, targeting US users with captions such as “factory price for Americans” and “no middleman, no mark-up”.

    In another clip, a factory worker pitches ultrasonic cleaning products with the line, “Trust me, trust me, Chinese people never cheat,” while a Guangzhou wholesaler claims through captions, “only 10 yuan for clothes that cost hundreds.”

    Meanwhile, on Rednote, China’s lifestyle-sharing platform, live streamers have launched promotions under hashtags like #saveourfactory and #shopinchina, urging local consumers to buy goods originally destined for US customers.

    Some sellers have filled their livestream sets with boxes bearing English shipping labels and barcodes, claiming they were forced to clear out warehouses because of the US tariffs.

    In a post, a seller offered steep discounts on small home appliances such as rice cookers, juicers and toasters, while lamenting that US companies “cancelled our contract”.

    “Now it’s all 90 per cent off!” the post wrote.

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-04-16/chinese-factories-turn-to-tiktok-bypass-tariffs-american-market/105184576

  11. K-beauty industry, customers reeling as Trump’s tariffs restrict global marketplace

    In a very busy marketplace, K-beauty — skincare products from South Korea — offers Americans a few key things – aesthetic products that look and feel high-end as well as decades of innovation that, by all reports, delivers results.

    But K-beauty products also come with a price point that sits well below most US equivalents and it’s this key point of difference some fear could now be under threat.

    The US president’s rewriting of trade rules across the world has left executives, start up founders, small business owners and consumers alike wondering how the industries they love and work in will look going forward.

    Christina Im runs K-beauty store Olive Kollection from California and brings her products into the US to sell domestically. The past two weeks have been spent trying to adapt to Donald Trump’s new rules.

    Initially, imports into the US from South Korea were hit with a 25 per cent so-called reciprocal tariff. “We had to hurry and try to restock at least some of our best sellers with the current price we have,” she told the ABC.

    Then just days later, Donald Trump seemed to back down, announcing a 90-day pause on his reciprocal tariffs and shifting South Korea to a 10 per cent flat rate tariff, along with most US trading partners.

    “So we spent, almost $US40,000 ($63,500) — all our cash that we had for the business — then the 25 per cent went away, so now we’re stuck with all this extra merchandise. Skincare actually does expire, so we have to try to now sell more, but then the economy’s not doing well, so it’s just a lot of a lot of [different] factors.”

    Skincare founder and one of the original K-beauty influencers Liah Yoo has explained the global supply chain behind her Krave Beauty products in a series of videos about Trump’s tariffs.

    “Right now China is probably the biggest country that can supply the amount of packaging that the beauty industry needs at scale, at a much more competitive and reasonable price,” she said.

    With imports from China facing 145 per cent tariffs, Yoo said: “This might actually bankrupt some beauty brands.”

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-04-15/kbeauty-and-global-skincare-industry-reeling-from-tariff-shock/105153034

    1. “China is probably the biggest country that can supply the amount of packaging that the beauty industry needs at scale”

      Someone’s got to make all those little plastic bottles and palette cases. [for the boyz, a palette is a tray that holds 4-25 different shades of eyeshadow, like a painter’s palette.]

  12. Shein’s tariff-busting shift hits home in Chinese factory hub

    The rapid rise of ultra-fast fashion retailer Shein has been so key to the fortunes of a group of urban villages on the outskirts of China’s southern metropolis of Guangzhou that they have been colloquially dubbed “Shein villages”.

    Shein was able to become a behemoth selling over $30 billion worth of goods annually on a foundation of cheap prices and advantageous trade rules, such as the U.S. “de minimis” exemption that allows low-cost imports to enter the country duty-free.

    On a recent visit to Shein villages in Panyu District, however, the mood was glum. Three factory bosses along with four local downstream suppliers said Shein’s local orders were in decline, pointing the finger at moves to diversify production to Vietnam.

    Factory owner Mr Li has been in business since 2006, manufacturing apparel for both the Chinese and international markets. He has been working with Shein for five years and says orders from the firm this year have dropped by 50% as more orders have moved to Vietnam.

    “The impact is quite obvious,” he said. “Tariffs are not something that we can see an end to for the time being, and we don’t know what will happen next.”

    “To be honest, cross-border (e-commerce) has been crazy in the past two years. Before, there was no such business in China,” says factory owner and Shein supplier Mr Hu, 56. “It was Xu Yangtian of Shein who made it happen,” he said, referring to the Chinese-Singaporean entrepreneur and founder of Shein. “He caused it to emerge.”

    For factory owner Li, the capital investment involved in a move to Vietnam, combined with what he said was less productive labour there compared with China, makes it an unappealing choice.

    “Here we can finish 1,000 pieces of clothing in one day, there it takes a month,” he said.

    While he plans to lean more heavily on his factory supplying the domestic market, Li said for some of his compatriots there is little option left: “They have only two choices. One is to go bankrupt, and the other is to go to Vietnam.”

    https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/topstories/sheins-tariff-busting-shift-hits-home-in-chinese-factory-hub/ar-AA1D09IM

    1. With all the tariff talk, are there any plans to close the loopholes that make it cheaper to ship goods from China than within the US? A few years ago I listened to a podcast that talked about how the USPS takes a loss on all these items drop-shipped from China. If I remember right, they took an item that came from China, with shipping, for something like $8, to the post office. USPS wanted about that much to ship it across town. With all of the post office’s financial problems, it seems like getting rid of them taking losses on these shipments is low hanging fruit.

  13. “A blacklist of Palm Beach County condominiums ineligible for Fannie Mae-backed mortgages has more than tripled over the past two years, according to a Miami law firm specializing in condo law.”

    Condos and HOAs were on my blacklist long before that condo collapse in Miami that spurred all of this. But now with some of the assessments I have seen these poor b@stard condo owners hit with, IMHO you would literally have to be insane to buy one in Costal SE Florida.

    1. IMHO you would literally have to be insane to buy one in Costal SE Florida.
      I am not sure I would want one if it was given to me. I remember last crash they were selling condos on golf courses for $10-12K.
      Of course, you have to pay a huge HOA golf course assessment of 75-100K upfront.

      1. related but as the boomers die out, a LOT of golf courses are going to be going bust.

        Darn few under 60 play or are even interested. Their consumer base is rapidly aging themselves out of existence

        1. Playing golf is expensive, and I’m not any good at it. If I want to walk around outdoors for five hours it’s called a national forest or wilderness area. Only costs the gas to drive there.

      1. Law firms get the lists and charge UHS for them. I read once they use FOIA to get them. You also find out when a loan gets denied, as it mentions in the article.

  14. ‘This is so hard’: The Chinese small businesses brought to a standstill by Trump’s tariffs

    “Trump is a crazy man,” says Lionel Xu, who is surrounded by his company’s mosquito repellent kits – many were once best sellers in Walmart stores in the United States.

    Now those products are sitting in boxes in a warehouse in China and will remain there unless President Donald Trump lifts his 145% tariffs on all Chinese goods bound for the US. “This is so hard for us,” he adds.

    Around half of all products made by his company Sorbo Technology are sold to the US.

    It is a small company by Chinese standards and has around 400 workers in Zhejiang province. But they are not alone in feeling the pain of this economic war.

    “We are worried. What if Trump doesn’t change his mind? That will be a dangerous thing for our factory,” says Mr Xu.

    Nearby, Amy is helping to sell ice cream makers at her booth for the Guangdong Sailing Trade Company. Her key buyers, including Walmart, are also in the US.

    “We have stopped production already,” she says. “All the products are in the warehouse.”

    It was the same story at nearly every booth in the sprawling Canton Fair in the trading hub of Guangzhou.

    When the BBC speaks to Mr Xu, he is getting ready to take some Australian buyers to lunch. They have come looking for a bargain and hope to drive down the price.

    China has maintained its defiant stance and has vowed to fight this trade war “until the end.”

    It is a tone also used by some at the fair. Hy Vian, who was looking to buy some electric ovens for his firm, waved off the effects of tariffs. “If they don’t want us to export – then let them wait. We already have a domestic market in China, we will give the best products to the Chinese first.”

    Chinese policymakers have also been trying to stimulate more growth in a sluggish economy by encouraging consumers to spend.

    But it is not working. Many of the country’s middle classes have invested their savings in buying the family home, only to watch their house prices slump in the last four years. Now they want to save money – not spend it.

    Not far from the Canton Fair, there are warrens of workshops in Guangdong making clothes, shoes and bags. This is the manufacturing hub for companies such as Shein and Temu.

    Each building houses several factories on several floors where workers will labour for 14 hours a day.

    On a pavement near some shoe factories, a few workers were squatting down to chat and smoke.

    “Things are not going well,” says one, who was unwilling to give his name. His friend urges him to stop talking. Discussing economic difficulties can be sensitive in China.

    “We’ve had problems since the Covid pandemic, and now there’s this trade war. I used to be paid 300-400 yuan ($40-54) a day, and now I will be lucky if I get 100 yuan a day.”

    The worker says it is difficult to find work these days. Others making shoes on the street also told us they only earned enough to live a basic life.

    Amy hopes her ice cream makers will head in a new direction.

    “We hope to open the new European market. Maybe Saudi Arabia – and of course Russia,” she adds.

    Others believe there is still money to be made in China. Among them is Mei Kunyan, 40, who says he is earning around 10,000 yuan a month at his shoe firm which sells to Chinese customers. Many major shoe manufacturers have moved to Vietnam where labour costs are cheaper.

    Mr Mei has also realised something that businesses around him are now discovering: “The Americas are too tricky.”

    https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/this-is-so-hard-the-chinese-small-businesses-brought-to-a-standstill-by-trumps-tariffs/ar-AA1CYwdD

    1. One of the Chinese diplomats told us that their society has been around for 5,000 years. These tariffs were put in place two weeks ago and already they’re struggling?

    2. “We hope to open the new European market. Maybe Saudi Arabia – and of course Russia,” she adds.

      Maybe the Saudis will buy, since they don’t make anything. But they will find that most of their targets are very protectionist

  15. This election, I’m looking at who will protect dairy farmers like me

    My name is Zachary.

    I live in Marshfield, P.E.I., on a dairy farm on a beautiful property with a stunning view of the Hillsborough River.

    I have been involved in our family farm from a young age. The cow barn has always been a safe space for me. It’s quiet and peaceful, and the cows keep me company if I need to cheer up.

    My farm is my favourite place on Earth. I want to do anything I can to protect and cherish it. That’s why I’m interested in politics.

    Even though I’m too young to vote in the 2025 federal election, I’m motivated to speak out because I want to have a government that respects and works for small family farms and other small businesses and the work they do to build our communities and economies.

    For me, farming is a job that gives me purpose because I think it will give me values that last a lifetime, like hard work and perseverance, and I also get to serve my community delicious and nutritious food.

    As a young person considering farming as a career, there are lots of concerns I have when it comes to the future of my family farm and the future of the dairy industry.

    Farms like mine could be greatly affected by decisions around managing tariffs, the housing crisis and any re-negotiation of North American trade.

    The tariffs imposed by the U.S. on Canada are causing big economic uncertainty, and while I understand the need to push back against these unfair practices, counter tariffs have the potential to harm as well.

    The cost of things like farm equipment and parts and supplies like grass and corn seed could go up.

    The Liberals, Conservatives and NDP have all endorsed counter tariffs, but I like the idea of other measures to fight the U.S. plans.

    I think it would be more beneficial to make our economy stronger and more self-reliant, to “Trump proof” our economy, as Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre and NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh put it.

    U.S. President Donald Trump has also made it clear he doesn’t like our dairy supply management system. He has called it “deeply unfair.”

    The supply management system is complex, but in short, it controls prices to keep them predictable for Canadian dairy farmers and restricts the supply of milk in the Canadian market, leaving little room for American dairy to come into Canada.

    If we don’t have a strong leader to reject Trump’s desire to get into our market, Canadian dairy farmers like my family could be hurt by cheaper American products.

    https://www.cbc.ca/kidsnews/post/this-election-im-looking-at-who-will-protect-dairy-farmers

    1. If we don’t have a strong leader to reject Trump’s desire to get into our market, Canadian dairy farmers like my family could be hurt by cheaper American products.

      That’s funny, when we try to keep you out of our markets, it’s evil at a Satanic level.

      1. Three years ago I boated over to Canada and booked four weeks at a marina. Customs visited in person and I declared a case of scotch aboard. They “decided” that I was going to consume all of it during my four weeks stay. I could have argued that point but didn’t. I stock for being out several months without easy access to shopping.

        The Duty, or Tariff, was more than I paid retail in the US. Since tariff isn’t based on final retail price I’m guessing it was approaching 200%. They think this is entirely reasonable, yet they are screaming like a school girl that we put 25% on cars. I’ve been told nothing this bad has happened in our whole history, EVER!

    2. so
      you’re saying that tariff’s work? and you don’t care about the rest of the canucks having to pay more to protect something that is important? Funny that.

  16. Trump Ally And Anti-ESG Crusader Joins Fannie Mae Board

    A Trump family ally and investment banker was appointed to the Fannie Mae board on Monday.

    Omeed Malik, the founder of investment firm 1789 Capital — where Donald Trump Jr. works — was added to the board by Federal Housing Finance Agency head Bill Pulte, he announced in a post to social media platform X.

    “Under President Trump, housing will enter its Golden Age. To have the best and brightest, Omeed Malik will be joining the Board of Fannie Mae, effectively immediately!” Pulte said. “Omeed brings great capital markets, legal and investment experience as we Make Fannie and Freddie Great Again!”

    Malik is the president of 1789 Capital, which has carved out a niche by publicly lambasting environmental, social and governance, or ESG, investing. Instead, Malik is a proponent of what he calls an EIG investment strategy focused on entrepreneurship, innovation and growth.

    Pulte’s post announcing Malik’s appointment came roughly 20 minutes after Pulte posted to X that “news on Fannie Mae [was] coming shortly.” The announcement sent Fannie Mae’s shares soaring, with the stock climbing by roughly 14% in trading Monday. The stock is up nearly 25% over the past five trading days.

    Since taking over at FHFA, Pulte has quickly moved to install allies in key positions. He appointed himself as chairman of the board at both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, dismissed eight Fannie Mae board members and replaced them with four new people. Six Freddie Mac board members were also replaced by three people picked by Pulte.

    https://www.bisnow.com/national/news/capital-markets/trump-ally-and-anti-esg-crusader-joins-fannie-mae-board-128919

  17. PCs call for more accessible public housing, NDP calls NLHC a ‘slum landlord’ in wake of Livingstone fire

    Members of Newfoundland and Labrador’s opposition parties say the province’s housing corporation needs to do better after a fire destroyed six public housing units in St. John’s last month.

    On March 27, a fire burned through a row of six Newfoundland and Labrador Housing Corporation (NLHC) — a provincial Crown corporation — units on Livingstone Street in downtown St. John’s. One person was displaced and has been transferred elsewhere. The five other units were vacant.

    NLHC announced it will demolish the units “in the interest of public safety,” according to interim Housing Minister Sarah Stoodley.

    “Those properties were not salvageable in terms of repair,” Stoodley said in a recent interview with CBC Radio’s The St. John’s Morning Show.

    “From a public safety perspective, we thought it was important to demolish them as soon as possible.”

    Since the units went up in flames, Stoodley says they’ve been subject to vandalism and break-ins.

    NDP Leader Jim Dinn wrote a letter to Stoodley.

    “The provincial government and NLHC seem to have written off the Tessier Park, Livingstone, centre city area neighbourhood, and the people who call the area home feel abandoned,” Dinn wrote.

    The cause of the fire is still unknown, but Dinn says he heard from nearby residents that unhoused people were staying in the vacant units to keep warm.

    “They knew that there was eventually going to be a fire here,” said Dinn. “People were, I guess, squatting in the place because they had nowhere else to go.”

    Walking through the downtown neighbourhood, Dinn says he’s observed siding peeling off houses, smashed windows and exposed insulation. He says it’s a sign of NLHC’s neglect.

    “The NLHC has started to look like a slum landlord,” Dinn wrote in his letter to Stoodley.

    https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/pcs-call-for-more-accessible-public-housing-ndp-calls-nlhc-a-slum-landlord-in-wake-of-livingstone-fire/ar-AA1CYgCX

    1. Who turns public housing into slums? The landlords or the tenants?

      And who causes the fires? I doubt they are spontaneous.

      1. Dow Jones
        -1.6%
        Nasdaq
        -3.41%
        S&P 500
        -2.39%
        AAPL
        -3.54%
        NVDA
        -8.68%
        MSFT
        -3.22%
        AMZN
        -3.72%
        META
        -3.91%
        TSLA
        -5.11%
        Dow Jones
        -1.6%
        Nasdaq
        -3.41%
        S&P 500
        -2.39%
        AAPL
        -3.54%
        NVDA
        -8.68%
        MSFT
        -3.22%
        AMZN
        -3.72%
        META
        -3.91%
        TSLA
        -5.11%

        Economy
        Markets
        One measure suggests the stock market has bottomed based on roadmaps from 2008 and 2020
        By Matthew Fox
        Reuters
        Apr 15, 2025, 8:27 AM PT

        – A buy signal flashed on Monday, suggesting the stock market has bottomed, said Tom Lee.

        – The Fundstrat head of research has been looking at the VIX, which gauges expected stock volatility.

        – He says recent movement in the index mirrors patterns from the market recoveries of 2008 and 2020.

        A “buy” indicator flashed on Monday, suggesting to Fundstrat head of research Tom Lee that the stock market bottom is in.

        https://www.businessinsider.com/stock-market-bottom-outlook-vix-decline-mirrors-2008-2020-fundstrat-2025-4

  18. Coachella Attendees Left Speechless Over ‘Ridiculous’ Cost Of Food And Drinks

    Coachella kicked off this weekend in Indio, California – probably one of the most popular, iconic and, let’s be honest, profitable music festivals in the United States and around the whole world. This year’s headliners were Lady Gaga, Green Day, Travis Scott, Post Malone… and Julia Fox, of course.

    But the main topic of our story today is in fact not the music, and not even Julia Fox’ outfit, but money. More precisely, the prices for food and drinks at the festival, which literally left numerous attendees and just random netizens totally speechless. Yes, in addition to the $599 minimum ticket price.

    Of course, attending Coachella isn’t actually cheap – the good old days of Woodstock’s low-cost romanticism of the sixties are gone, and will most likely never return. But if you look at the prices of food and drinks… For example, the user @MYFriendGavin on X posted a Coachella alcohol price list this year, and many netizens rightly noted that the prices clearly look inflated.

    According to the TikToker Ruth Viveros, on the first day of the festival, she spent a total of $102 on a plate of loaded nachos, three tacos and two lemonades ($17 each). “It’s mostly ice but it’s so good!” the blogger sarcastically notes. She also has complaints about the quality of this food – for example, the tortillas in the tacos “are like freezing cold.” Overall, Ruth rated the food 5/10.

    For example, it’s $30 for Nate’s Nashville hot chicken slider and fries, a slice of pepperoni pizza is $11, and chicken tenders & fries can be bought for $20. In general, as noted by this year’s attendees, most items start at $15-20, and the average price for food fluctuates around $20-30. On the other hand, you have to pay for the pleasure of listening to and seeing the top names in world music, right?

    Some responders who also attended Coachella this year also cited prices and were more than indignant. For example, about 7 or 8 dollars for a small taco and even $10-12 for a regular size hot dog. And this is not a joke, this is the absolute truth, the commenters assured. “Not to mention the extremely long lines and wait time,” another person also added in the comments.

    https://www.aol.com/coachella-music-vibes-high-food-094057203.html

      1. What makes you think that’s even allowed inside the venue? And if not, how long does it take to walk to where you parked, eat, and walk back in?

        Live music died for me in 2021-2022, I will never give money to a venue or manager of venues that implemented, or even proposed, Clot Shot Passports as a condition of entry. And f* all the woke artists who refused to play for Purebloods, or kicked Pureblood members out of their own band.

  19. People in Glass Houses

    Trump administration refers NY AG Letitia James for potential prosecution over alleged mortgage fraud

    By Josh Christenson and Victor Nava
    Published April 15, 2025
    Updated April 16, 2025, 12:30 a.m. ET

    WASHINGTON — New York Attorney General Letitia James — who infamously declared that “no one is above the law” when she was targeting Donald Trump — was hit with a federal criminal referral for instances of alleged mortgage fraud on Tuesday, according to a letter obtained by The Post.

    Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director William Pulte sent the missive to Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy AG Todd Blanche, alleging that James had “falsified records” to get home loans for a property in Virginia that she claimed was her “principal residence” in 2023 — while still serving as a New York state prosecutor.

    That occurred in late August 2023, weeks before James began her civil fraud trial against the Trump Organization for overinflating the values of many of its properties, which ended in a $454 million judgment.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/15/us-news/trump-administration-refers-ny-ag-tish-james-for-prosecution/

  20. Nigerians fear savings lost as investment app freezes them out

    Angry Nigerians are turning to social media to describe how they have been locked out of their accounts on the digital financial platform, CBEX.

    People have posted videos of themselves crying, saying that they could not withdraw their investments and worried that their money had gone.

    Some angry customers ransacked a CBEX office in the south-west city of Ibadan, carting off chairs, air-conditioners and a solar panel. CBEX has not yet publicly commented.

    The company had promised that investors would double their money every month. Nigeria is currently facing straitened economic times and many are desperate to find a way to boost their income.

    One investor, identified as Ola, told BBC Pidgin that he feared he had lost 450,000 naira ($280; £210).

    “I was ready to withdraw all my investment just last week but my friend told me to be patient and wait – and now it has crashed,” Ola said.

    Many others have shared similar stories online, with one person talking about losing $16,000.

    For some, the situation brings back painful memories from 2016 when another popular financial scheme, called MMM, froze its transactions, leaving many investors heartbroken.

    Members were supposed to receive a 30% return on their investment in just 30 days. It launched in Nigeria in November 2015 and according to its founders, had up to three million members before it collapsed.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/personalfinance/nigerians-fear-savings-lost-as-investment-app-freezes-them-out/ar-AA1CXkWg

  21. “Is anyone in Nigeria not a crook?”

    Q. Nigeria: Why is corruption so rampant?

    [Here is one answer …]

    There’s always so much talk about the ‘politicians’ that we might end up convincing an outsider they are the ONLY ones with the corruption problem. If we’re being honest, it is actually a deep rooted systemic problem that cuts across all social strata in the country regardless of ethnicity.

    The pockets of shady deals, cheating, bribery, stealing, racketeering and dishonest activities that happen on a micro level in Nigerian society all contribute to make corruption the big problem it is. That is essentially why what the politicians do is tolerated and nothing seems to be done about it.

    I always pose this question to those who solely blame the politicians for this problem that; are they (the politicians) aliens or foreigners? Are they not also a product of this same society? So what makes you think you’ll do any better than them? Because let’s face it; after almost 3 decades of democracy and with different administrations, the problem still persists if it hasn’t even gotten worse.

    So, the common man blaming the politicians in Nigeria is also flawed if we’re being honest. It’s a bigger problem that requires a huge shift in our ideologies and orientation if we are really serious about ending it.

    https://www.reddit.com/r/Nigeria/comments/18s7pkf/why_is_corruption_so_rampant/

  22. NY Times – How China Took Over the World’s Rare Earths Industry.

    China seized mines and built factories. Japan took note and invested in Australia. But the United States did little despite concerns about control of supplies.

    https://archive.ph/BhJDC

    China shook the world in 2010 when it imposed an embargo on exports of crucial rare earth metals to Japan. Panicked Japanese executives appeared on television to warn that they were running out of the critical raw materials.

    The embargo, prompted by a territorial dispute, lasted only seven weeks. But it changed the global supply chain for these metals. When the embargo was over, China took forceful control of its mineral bounty. Top officials in Beijing rooted out corruption, crushed smugglers and consolidated the industry under state control.

    The world was put on notice, especially Japan and the United States, two of China’s biggest customers for rare earth metals used in everything from cars to smartphones to missiles. Governments from both countries drafted detailed plans for how to mitigate their dependence on China. Japan has largely followed through on its plans and today can source the minerals from Australia.

    Not the United States. Even after 15 years, the country is still almost entirely reliant on China for the processing of rare earth metals. As a result, American automakers, aerospace companies and defense contractors have been left vulnerable.

    Angry about President Trump’s tariffs, China has suspended all exports of certain rare earths, as well as the even more valuable magnets made from them.

    These small yet powerful magnets — no bigger than a ring for a person’s finger, yet with 15 times the force of a conventional iron magnet — are an inexpensive and often overlooked component of electric motors. They are used in electric and gasoline-powered cars as well as robots, drones, offshore wind turbines, missiles, fighter jets and many other products.

    The American failure to devise an alternative to its dependence on Chinese supplies has spanned Democratic and Republican administrations.

    “U.S. policymakers for 15 years have done very little to address the risk of dependence on China for rare earths, and specifically rare earth magnets,” said Milo McBride, a specialist in critical minerals at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington.
    Rare earths, he said, are “the most strategic minerals of all the minerals that have been discussed for the last several administrations.”

    Beijing’s 2010 embargo against Japan was undermined by Chinese organized crime syndicates that controlled much of the industry in south-central China in collusion with local officials. The gangsters had been smuggling up to half of China’s annual rare earths production out of the country.

    Weeks after the embargo ended, Beijing took revenge. Government forces acting under national security orders stormed the valley near Longnan in Jiangxi Province where much of the world’s heavy rare earth minerals were produced. They seized the privately run mines and jailed thousands of people across southern China. Regulation of the industry was transferred from local governments to Beijing.

    The mines were later nationalized and consolidated into a single state-run company, China Rare Earth Group. During a visit last week to the valley without the knowledge of the local authorities, there was no sign of the thugs who used to guard southern China’s rare earth mines.

    China has recently developed its own magnet industry instead of shipping the materials to magnet factories in Japan. Beijing has poured money into building advanced magnet factories in Ganzhou, a city near Longnan.

    China now produces 90 percent of the world’s magnets. Further construction was underway at two of Ganzhou’s largest magnet factories last week.

    China’s top leader, Xi Jinping, said in a speech in 2020 that it was important for China’s national security that the West’s supply chains remain dependent on his country.

    “We must build up our strengths and consolidate our international lead in industries where we have an advantage,” he said a few months after visiting Ganzhou’s most advanced magnet factory. He called for “intensifying the dependence of international industrial supply chains on China, forming a powerful capacity to counter and deter deliberate supply cutoffs by foreigners.”

    Japan also took far-reaching actions after the 2010 embargo. Its manufacturers began holding enough rare earths in inventory to meet up to two years of their own needs. They also started looking overseas.

    The conglomerate Sumitomo Group, with financial backing from the Japanese government, helped support the development of Lynas, an Australian mining company. Lynas mines and refines 60 percent of Japan’s light rare earths, which are mixed with small quantities of heavy rare earths to make rare earth magnets. And the company is preparing to start refining heavy rare earths for Japanese manufacturers this summer in Malaysia, although initially in tiny quantities.

    Japan’s biggest magnet manufacturers — Proterial, Shin-Etsu Chemical Company and TDK Corporation — have moved some production from Japan to China to have reliable access to rare earths, and also to Vietnam, where labor costs are low. But they have also kept considerable production in Japan.

    The U.S. rare earth magnet industry started with a subsidiary of General Motors in northern Indiana in the 1980s. But factories shut down and moved to China and Singapore.

    After the embargo in 2010, the Japanese company Hitachi Metals, which changed its name in 2023 to Proterial, responding to concern from the administration of former President Barack Obama, built a rare earth magnets factory in North Carolina from 2011 to 2013.

    The Hitachi Metals factory, with several dozen employees, had higher costs than the giant complexes being built in Ganzhou. American companies proved unwilling to pay extra for magnets produced in the United States and switched to Chinese suppliers. Hitachi closed the factory in 2020 and the equipment went into storage.

    Today the only active rare earth mine in the United States is in Mountain Pass, Calif. Its operator, MP Materials, plans to start ramping up commercial production of rare earth magnets at the end of the year at a factory in Texas. But even when running at full speed, the facility will produce in a year the equivalent of a day of China’s production.

    Chinese factories supply thousands of tons of rare earth magnets each year to the country’s manufacturers of electric cars and offshore wind turbines — two industries that Mr. Trump has criticized.

    Like magnet production, rare earth mining has also had an uneven history in the United States. The Mountain Pass mine produced a majority of the world’s rare earths from 1965 until 1995, when China began flooding the global market with all manner of low-cost exports.

    The mine closed in 2002, partly because of ever stricter environmental regulations by California. A $1.5 billion upgrade started in 2010, but mining did not resume until 2017 — and then the mine had to ship its ore to China for processing at low-cost refineries there. Only now has the mine begun refining a large share of its production.

    Zoning and environmental regulations make it hard to open a rare earth mine in the United States. Opening a rare earth mine in the United States takes 29 years, said Mark Smith, the chairman and chief executive of NioCorp Developments, which has obtained construction permits to build a mine in Nebraska.
    “You can spend a whole career getting a mine up and running,” Mr. Smith said.

    By contrast, mines in China can be opened quickly and do not have to undergo the same kind of rigorous regulatory approval.
    Underpinning all the problems is that the global market for the minerals is tiny next to other kinds of mining, like copper.
    Few American companies have wanted to make big investments in rare earths only to face the risk, as Hitachi found, that customers prefer cheaper products from government-backed industries in China.

    “U.S. companies have been reluctant to take the plunge,” said David Sandalow, who oversaw critical minerals policy in the Obama administration

  23. [An opinion from What’s Up With That …]

    America’s Last Stand: China’s Smart Battery Dominance.

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/04/16/americas-last-stand-chinas-smart-battery-dominance/

    By Andrew King

    America remains perilously unaware as it approaches a catastrophic ambush—a savvy, ruthless strategy designed to eliminate credible competition in the critical energy and rare earth domain. Contemporary Amperex Technology Limited (CATL) is aggressively orchestrating a $5 billion+ initial public offering (IPO) in Hong Kong. Bolstered by powerful global financial syndicate, which includes Bank of America and JPMorgan, CATL is deliberately targeting the most influential, global investors, including America’s largest asset managers, BlackRock, Prudential, State Street, and Vanguard.

    While Wall Street leaders claim prudent stewardship, Bank of America and JPMorgan are headlining the bookrunning of the offering for CATL—a Chinese company explicitly 1260H-listed by the Pentagon calling attention to their direct ties to China’s military-industrial complex—expected to be the largest Hong Kong listing since at least 2021. This isn’t merely bad optics; it’s strategic sabotage, endangering America’s national security.

    Make no mistake: CATL is not just a battery company—it’s central to China’s global ambitions. With a dominant 38% share of the global electric vehicle battery market, supplying giants like Tesla, BMW, Ford, and Volkswagen, CATL anchors Beijing’s bid to dominate strategic technologies. At January’s World Economic Forum at Davos, CATL co-chair Pan Jian boasted of a new class of electric vehicles (EVs), “Electric Intelligent Vehicles” (EIVs)—cars equipped with CCP-backed surveillance technology, converting everyday vehicles into mobile intelligence assets to be dispersed across the globe. This is not speculation—it follows the CCP’s proven playbook, replicating Huawei’s telecom networks, ZPMC’s ship-to-shore, Port-based cranes, and TikTok’s data harvesting models.

    Let this sink in: Bank of America—the very namesake of our nation—is actively providing financial and reputational cover for a firm that functions as a de facto extension of China’s military. A bank accused of systematically discriminating against American conservative and faith-based groups by fourteen state attorney generals and President Trump, who publicly excoriated CEO Brian Moynihan for politically motivated “debanking” of citizens at home, is actively facilitating China’s global ambitions abroad.

    CATL: A Strategic Threat Far Worse than TikTok.

    CATL represents a danger well beyond TikTok’s near-term data-harvesting concerns. While TikTok represents a near-term threat, it is in an industry notable for the fickleness of customers and rapid pace emergent platforms supplant laggards, while energy, battery and transportation technologies are deeply embedded in infrastructure with useful lives spanning decades. In fact, these strengths are so decisive that Beijing has structured its global ambitions on EV batteries, solar panels, and electric vehicles as cornerstones of its Belt and Road Initiative. According to the Rhodium Group, these same three segments accounted for 77% of Chinese foreign direct investment in 2024—of which, two of the three CATL is a leader—underscoring CATL’s central role as a strategic asset in Beijing’s goals of global dominance.

    Yet beneath CATL’s EV battery veneer lies a deeper, more sinister strategic geopolitical calculus: reinforcing China’s near-total monopoly over rare earth minerals and critical materials that power nearly all semiconductor and advanced technologies. “China accounts for approximately 69% of global rare earth ore production and processes about 90% of rare earth minerals globally,” according to Polytechnique Insights. Make no mistake, CATL’s true geopolitical threat is not simply batteries; CATL is poised to be a rare earth mineral juggernaut. This is not a battery fight, it is a rare earth mineral war.

    China controls 90% of permanent magnet manufacturing, it refines 98% of the world’s gallium, produces 99% of its terbium, and dominates 85% of global battery production. These are not abstract numbers—they represent a strategic chokehold on the materials that power commercial electronic guidance systems, electric vehicles, semiconductors, and next-generation energy solutions. And every piece of military hardware and advanced technology relies on these minerals, just as China restricted exports of the vast majority of such elements, publicly revealing a pillar of their economic statecraft strategy decades in the making.

    In an era of electronics, control of rare earth and critical minerals is the kingmaker.

    The threat is most clearly displayed by a simple categorical listing of the most critical minerals:

    Source: American Resources Policy Network, unless noted herein. Samarium is per FreightWaves; Lithium is per Georgetown Security Studies Review; Gadolinium, Yttrium is per ChinaPower Project.

    For critical minerals like Neodymium (precision-guided missiles), Gallium (semiconductors), Terbium (sonar), and Graphene (advanced sensors), China’s dominance approaches absolute—between 95% and 99%. As illustrated, reconstituting American capacity would require billions of dollars for each mineral and, for the vast majority of minerals, five to ten years to reconstitute a competitive balance—with some rare minerals having estimates of a decade and a half, time the U.S. simply does not have.[1]

    These minerals underpin every advanced American weapons system, from F-35 fighters and submarines to guided missiles and drones. Wall Street’s underwriting of CATL’s IPO further cements China’s chokehold, allowing Beijing to weaponize American dependency.

    Intellectual Property Theft: China’s Longstanding Playbook.

    China has spent decades infiltrating American artificial intelligence labs, quantum computing firms, and advanced materials research centers—stealing $400-600 billion annually in intellectual property (IP). CATL’s IPO prospectus claims 40,000 filed and secured patents, dubious marketing already being debunked, evincing a more surreptitious, deeper question of the strategic use of China’s patent office in strategic IP warfare undermining and chilling the global trademark and patent field. Together with IP theft and forced coercion of companies, the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) perpetuates the charade of China as a “developing country,” a designation that permits favorable exemptions, waivers, and concessions benefiting China. As the think tank, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) notes, “China’s state-supported technology champions frequently benefit from stolen or unfairly appropriated intellectual property, directly undermining U.S. innovation.” By underwriting CATL’s IPO, Wall Street is indirectly legitimizing the industrial-scale theft of U.S. intellectual property and ruse of accountability under the WTO.

    The CCP’s “Golden Share” Racket.

    Perhaps even more reprehensible, this IPO directly benefits the Chinese Communist Party.

    Beijing routinely employs a tactic known as the “Golden Share”—where a small government stake (often just 1%) grants the CCP outsized control over corporate decision-making. And with more than 12% ownership through state-owned entities, this IPO will massively inflate the value of their holdings, handing Beijing billions in fresh capital to fuel its military and industrial ambitions.

    Rare Earths Rare Earth Dominance: China’s Hidden Weapon.
    Control of rare earth and critical minerals is the decisive geopolitical lever and CATL is the vehicle of China’s broad ambitions which, as Chairman Jian noted, CATL has found a way to combine a range of rare earth-based technologies into EIV consumer sales. The Select Committee on the CCP further highlights ethical concerns, noting CATL’s supply chain has “indisputable evidence” of ties to forced labor in Xinjiang.

    This IPO will enable CATL to penetrate European markets aggressively (Germany, Hungary, Spain), undermining American competitiveness and solidifying China’s global technological hegemony. It also provides a convenient loophole for U.S. investors who, due to restrictive mandates, may not be able to directly invest in mainland China but have greater discretion to channel funding through the Hong Kong market.

    This IPO represents a strategic catastrophe. It enables China’s geopolitical ascent, legitimizes corporate espionage, and compromises America’s technological edge. By backing CATL’s IPO, Bank of America and JPMorgan implicitly legitimize industrial-scale IP theft, rewarding China’s illicit behavior and empowering Beijing at America’s expense. America’s banks must renounce their roles in any fundraising by CATL.

    America Must Act—Decisively.

    This moment demands clarity and leadership from both the private and public sectors.

    Financial institutions must:

    Withdraw from CATL’s IPO and refrain from engaging with entities flagged as national security threats.

    Reassess risk frameworks to prioritize long-term national interest over short-term gain.

    Government agencies must:

    Move CATL from the Pentagon’s 1260H list to the Treasury Department’s OFAC sanctions list, which would impose binding restrictions.

    Harmonize the regulatory stance across Treasury, Commerce, and Defense to prevent CCP-linked companies from accessing U.S. capital and sensitive technologies.

    The stakes could not be clearer.

    Bank of America’s CEO Brian Moynihan, who already faces a legacy most notable for excessive caution and lagging shareholder performance, is poised to be inextricably linked to overseeing a collaboration with America’s avowed enemy, further tarnishing an iconic banking brand. Mr. Moynihan faces a decisive moment, one that will define not only his leadership and Bank of America’s legacy but also America’s role in the world.

    The banks’ actions will have far-reaching consequences, not just for the banks’ shareholders, but for every American who still believes in the values of freedom, security, and sovereignty. Investment banks, especially Bank of America, must choose. Do these banks serve America’s long-term prosperity, or merely eager, unprincipled mercenaries acting as accomplices in China’s strategic campaign to supplant our nation?

    America deserves—and demands—an answer.

  24. ‘Everyone has a relatively short memory, so as things had sped up and we had historically low inventory. That felt normal, and it was like, ‘Oh, yeah, why would houses not always go up by 10 percent a year?’

    Every shanty in the US would be over a million pesos in no time. It will never happen, thus illogical to the point of mania.

  25. ‘When the factual information does not qualify the community because it hasn’t kept reserves and hasn’t done the work, they want the information to change overnight,’ said Michael Gelfand, a West Palm Beach attorney who specializes in real estate and association law, noting that another key question for lenders is how many units are owner-occupied’

    How this worked in the 2000’s is instructive here. The GSE’s will continue to close the loan window on categories outright. Yer on yer own. Too many people who don’t live there full time? Too many renters? Then they shrink the window again, in secret. On top of ‘are you guys putting any money away for repairs?’ If it’s anything like the 2000’s we should be hearing many stories like this.

  26. ‘Homeowners during COVID accrued home equity gains above that which we would have otherwise expected,’ said Clare Knapp, housing economist at ABOR. “We’re also seeing perhaps a little bit of reluctance among sellers to meaningfully reduce their home prices, and I think that has contributed to some extent to that sluggishness in sales. It’s a very different market for buyers than it was even a few years ago during the pandemic, when buyers really didn’t have many options available to them, and we were just watching homes fly off the shelves,’ she continued. Even though prices are declining, Knapp said more needs to happen. While the median sales of a home in the metropolitan statistical area dropped 12% from 2022 to 2024, that value was 40% higher in 2024 than it was in 2019′

    Here’s the thing Clair. You keep saying prices are going down, yet we know you took a 20% a$$ pounding years ago. So how are you down 12% from the peak?

  27. ‘When a person makes a decision to allow their home to go into foreclosure, it’s not a decision they make lightly. It means that there’s no hope to recover. It is pretty much the last recourse’

    Yer right Martin, everybody pays their bills on time in the US of A! Billionaires are tossing keys daily.

  28. ‘More development creates losers as well as winners, so you’d better box out the bad development or at least make those developers pay through the nose’…without the tight planning controls he championed, ‘will leave air pollution, overcrowded schools, underpoliced streets, sewer systems bursting at their seams, and traffic jams that can (and often do in California) make grown men cry.’ One prescription was for developers to pay for all libraries, parks, roads, sewage systems, etc. ‘at the same time as the houses — not five years later (or never) like most of these punks in pinstripes prefer’

    These people are clearly fascists.

    1. ‘When the plan for Briggs Village was adopted more than 20 years ago, residents were promised a grocery store would be built in the ‘urban village’ neighborhood. Now, at the property developer’s request, the city is considering relaxing requirements around the size of a grocery store, and some worry the changes will mean no store will ever fill that space. Lahela Peterson lives in Briggs Village. She said the amendments will lead to ‘a glut of market-rate apartments that cost more than what I’m paying for my monthly mortgage and property taxes’

      This is just what Peter Navarro is talking about Lahela.

  29. ‘With advertising revenue from his videos already dropping, the extra C$1,600 ($1,150) a month he’d have to pay on a mortgage over what he currently pays in rent has grown more unappealing. And though he already has the down payment he’d need, he fears the economy could get worse, and any property bought today might just drop in value tomorrow. ‘It’s not even just the stress of potentially getting a mortgage, it’s the stress of the uncertainty,’ Struk said. ‘Who knows what’s going to happen? Especially with Trump’

    We are all living rent free in K-das skull right now Eric.

  30. ‘My concern is whether the expansion to everybody, all first home buyers, whether that will increase housing prices…If it increases demand, does that put more money into the pocket of some other person who I’m competing against?’…‘Limit the amount of investment properties one person can own. Straight off the bat,’ she said. ‘I kind of get why it’s in place, but it’s just sucking the wealth from the middle class to the wealthy class’…I think negative gearing needs to go, but I also feel like none of our current crop of politicians is willing to engage with that. I mean, after what happened to Bill Shorten — and he was only going to very lightly touch that issue — nobody’s going to go there.’ They also want to see action on barriers like planning restrictions on urban density, and stamp duty. ‘To be frank, it seems like a butt tonne of money that I have to find to pay to the government so that I can live in somewhere that I own, as opposed to somewhere that I rent’

    Central planning!

  31. Things Are Out Of Control In The Condo Market (GTA Condo Real Estate Market Update)

    Team Sessa Real Estate

    56 minutes ago TORONTO

    We also discuss how inventory is piling up and people may think they are fixing the situation by renting their unit but they are only making matters worse. This episode looks at the current GTA Condo Markets – Toronto, York Region & Peel Region for the week ending April 9, 2025.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VraNvrXV4H8

    16:29.

  32. It’s pretty interesting how the article I’m about to post cites the example of the 2020 baby dip in home prices, which was quashed by massive, inflationary money printing, but completely neglects to mention the massive and pervasive housing price collapse of the 2007-2012 period.

    Try not to catch yourself a falling knife.

    1. Mortgages
      Will home prices drop if there’s a recession?
      Written by Molly Grace
      Edited by Libby Kane
      Affiliate links for the products on this page are from partners that compensate us (see our advertiser disclosure with our list of partners for more details). However, our opinions are our own. See how we rate mortgages to write unbiased product reviews.
      A couple and their real estate agent walk toward a house with a lower home price due to a recession
      gorodenkoff/Getty Images
      Apr 15, 2025, 7:32 AM PT

      – Home prices aren’t expected to drop this year, but a recession could change that.

      – Even with a recession, we may not see prices drop more than 5%, one economist says.

      – If you’re buying a house in a recession, make sure you’re on strong financial footing.

      Home prices don’t always go down in a recession, but they can.

      During the brief recession in 2020, median home prices fell by almost $12,000, though they quickly reversed course and ended 2021 almost $100,000 higher.

      https://www.businessinsider.com/will-home-prices-drop-recession-trump-tariffs-2025-4

    1. The Tell
      Why U.S. investors might be seriously underestimating the risk of a recession
      By Joseph Adinolfi
      Published: April 16, 2025 at 1:41 p.m. ET
      U.S. economic activity is slowing in 2025, but investors have yet to price this in.
      Photo: charly triballeau/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images

      President Donald Trump’s latest tariff tweaks appear to have helped stabilize U.S. financial markets — at least, for now.

      But Daniel von Ahlen, a senior macro strategist at GlobalData TS Lombard, fears investors might be underestimating the risk of a recession. If he turns out to be right, this could lead to more pain later this year, especially for stocks.

      https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-u-s-investors-might-be-seriously-underestimating-the-risk-of-a-recession-422b9c28

    2. Markets
      Resist the urge to buy the dip in stocks because recession risk is still being ignored, research firm says
      By Matthew Fox
      NYse trader
      Adam Gray/Getty Images
      Apr 16, 2025, 11:34 AM PT

      – The macro strategist Daniel von Ahlen advises against buying stocks due to the risk of a recession.

      – Investors underestimate the risks of tariffs, spending cuts, and other Trump policies, he says.

      – Von Ahlen suggests investors focus on defensive sectors and inflation-protected Treasurys.

      Daniel von Ahlen, a senior macro strategist at GlobalData TS Lombard, says now is not the time to buy the broad decline in stocks.

      The S&P 500 is down 13% from its mid-February peak as investors worry about the impacts of President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

      But they’re not worrying enough, von Ahlen said in a note on Wednesday, adding that investors are complacent and “significantly underpricing” the risk of an imminent recession.

      https://www.businessinsider.com/stock-market-outlook-dont-buy-decline-high-recession-risk-tariffs-2025-4

    3. Financial Times
      Opinion Lex
      Wall Street isn’t pricing in recession risk
      There can be a large lag between the economy weakening and confirmation of an R-word event catching up
      A US flag flying near the New York Stock Exchange
      Companies are increasingly dropping their earnings guidance for the coming months, citing trade turmoil
      © AFP via Getty Images
      Published Apr 15 2025

      Given the recent thumping their portfolios have taken, investors could be forgiven for thinking that equities must now be factoring in a lot of downside risk. False hopes help no one, however. US stocks are barely out of the starting gate when it comes to pricing in an economic downturn.

      From their mid-February peak to their low on April 8 — the day before US President Donald Trump announced a 90-day pause on his so-called reciprocal tariffs — the S&P 500 tumbled 19 per cent. It could have been worse: market darlings Nvidia and Apple were off about 30 per cent over that time. The subsequent relief rally has cut the index’s loss to 12 per cent.

      That’s not a big drop, by historical standards. On average, the S&P 500 drops 37 per cent peak-to-trough in a recession, according to a JPMorgan Chase analysis of the five that have happened since 1980.

    4. Moneywise
      Hedge fund legend, who earned 4,144% during COVID, warns stocks will crash 80% and ‘Armageddon’ is coming
      Jing Pan
      Wed, April 16, 2025 at 3:42 AM PDT 6 min read

      The U.S. stock market has taken a beating as Trump’s tariff-fueled sell-offs continue to rattle investors. But according to one prominent bear, the worst is yet to come.

      Mark Spitznagel, founder and chief investment officer of Universa Investments, warned in commentary to MarketWatch that a historic collapse may be looming.

      “I expect an 80% crash when this is over. I just don’t think this is it. This is a trap,” he said on April 7, days before Trump announced a 90-day pause on his plan to hike tariffs on most countries.

      The stock market recovered some losses on that announcement, but it’s still a chilling forecast from Spitznagel. The S&P 500 is down roughly 7% year to date — enough to shake investor confidence — yet Spitznagel suggests that could be just the beginning of a much steeper fall.

      https://finance.yahoo.com/news/hedge-fund-legend-earned-4-104200152.html

      1. Markets
        Hedge funds are dumping stocks — just as mom-and-pop investors rush in
        Retail flows into U.S. stocks have surged, with everyday investors “aggressively buying the dip.” But the “smart money” is backing off
        By Catherine Baab
        Updated Tuesday 2:17PM

        As markets swing wildly on tariff headlines and economic uncertainty, a curious split is emerging: Retail investors are diving in, while institutional players are stepping back.

        Retail flows into U.S. stocks have surged this past week, with everyday investors “aggressively buying the dip,” according to Vanda Research, even as volatility spikes and recession warnings linger. Trading app data shows a notable uptick in activity, especially among tech names and single-stock bets.

        In short: Main Street is leaning in.
        But the so-called ‘smart money’ isn’t following suit

        Hedge funds have slashed their equity exposure by nearly $45 billion over the past 30 days, according to data shared by The Kobeissi Letter, marking a sharp divergence from the retail crowd. While the pullback intensified following Trump’s April 2 “Liberation Day” speech, when tariff rhetoric escalated and volatility spiked, the retreat has been underway for months.

        https://qz.com/investor-flows-nasdaq-dow-s-p-500-gs-1851776287

Leave a Reply to Ben Jones Cancel comment reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *