skip to Main Content
thehousingbubble@gmail.com

That ‘For Sure’ Feeling Hasn’t Come Yet

A report from WUSA. “The number of homes for sale in D.C. has reached record highs. The exodus of fired federal workers is leading to major shifts in the District’s real estate landscape. Many federal workers have lost their careers, and now have to leave behind their homes. ‘It’s sad, I feel bad for a lot of them. I have some, they just don’t know want to do,’ said Mary Bazargan, who has been a real estate agent in D.C. for around 10 years. She said she now has a surge of clients affected by the federal government’s job cuts. ‘The D.C. market is still healthy, but sellers do need to make sure that they are competitive, or maybe just a little conservative.'”

From Realtor.com. “Canadian snowbirds have long enjoyed a connection with Sun Belt states such as Florida, Arizona, and Texas. But now, that migration pattern is under pressure. A weakening Canadian dollar, rising U.S. housing costs, and growing geopolitical tensions between the two countries are prompting many Canadian homeowners to sell their U.S. properties and repatriate their gains. Miles Zimbaluk, a Realtor® and founder of Canada to USA, has worked with snowbird clients for years. Typically, his business is evenly split between buyers and sellers. But this year, he says, almost everyone is looking to sell. ‘We just have no Canadians that are really buying properties right now,’ he says. Some sellers are making the decision based purely on financial strain. ‘If it is too expensive to maintain that property … I would say it’s definitely a good time to sell,’ says Zimbaluk.”

From KOAA. “Home buyers in Colorado have more choices and still have time to shop around as the housing market in Colorado remains balanced, according to experts. ‘The Colorado Housing Market is characterized by more inventory this year compared to last year,’ Cooper Thayer, a market spokesperson and a Realtor with the Colorado Association of Realtors, explained. ‘We see about 50 percent more active listings on the market. In fact, right now, there are about 24,000 or 25,000 homes active on the market in Colorado. This is one of the highest levels we’ve seen in a little over a decade.'”

“In the seven-county Denver area, single-family and condo-townhome average days on market came in at 54, up more than 20% from where things stood in March 2024. Thayer also pointed out that nearly one in three sellers had to drop their original listing price last month. ‘We’re seeing sellers take a lot more of a methodical approach to preparing their homes for the market, and you have to be quick and reactive if your home does not get the attention that you’re expecting,’ Thayer stated. ‘Last month, we actually saw about 29 percent of active listings on the market reduce their price, which is in line with the rest of the country, but probably on the higher end, when compared to some of the other states that don’t have quite as much excess inventory as Colorado does.'”

From Arizona’s Family. “If you’ve driven around Valley neighborhoods lately, it probably won’t take long to stumble across a home for sale. ‘We were ready for a change, and honestly, being back in the house, it’s kind of bittersweet because I love this house, I’ve put a lot into the house, and I want another family to enjoy it as much as we have,’ said Brandi Kilby. Six weeks ago, the Kilbys put their north Peoria home near Happy Valley Road and 73rd Avenue on the market. ‘I thought for sure I would have my house sold by now,’ she said. But that ‘for sure’ feeling hasn’t come yet, even with the listing’s recent price drop. ‘I honestly feel like it’s just uncertain times right now,’ explained Kilby. ‘I’m just being faced with a decision to rent it out or hold and keep it on the market a little bit longer.'”

“Kilby’s home is one of nearly 20,000 that were on the active market in the Phoenix metro area in April. That month was the highest number of active listings in the area in several years. ‘You’ve got a lot more competition if you’re selling, so you might have to do a lot more concessions, maybe lower the price,’ says Independent Real Estate Market Analyst John Wake. ‘We’re to the point where the number of homes for sale, the supply of homes for sale, is so high it’s starting to put downward pressure on prices.'”

The Real Deal on California. “More and more borrowers are handing over the keys to their distressed buildings, according to panelists at the IMN Distressed CRE West Forum in San Francisco this week, leaving their lenders with no court fight to foreclose but often a ‘pretty messy’ clean up job filled with potential pitfalls and liabilities. About one-third of distressed borrowers recently have been offering a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure to their lenders, according to Dan Duarte, director of the special assets department at Chico-based Tri-Counties Bank, who moderated a panel on ‘Forced Owner Exit Strategies.’ Duarte said it had been years since he had seen this many borrowers ready to walk, oftentimes leaving the bank with not just the building, but also past due taxes.”

“‘The borrower is actually coming to the bank and saying, ‘Look, will you accept a deed-in-lieu? We’re done. We don’t want to go through the foreclosure process. We don’t want to take on default interest rates. We just want to hand it back to you,’ he said. But banks do not want to own more buildings, especially where the value of the property becomes significantly lower than the debt. So while there is some simplicity to deed-in-lieu agreements, ‘we spend a lot of time trying to avoid that,’ said Seth Moldoff, director of special assets for Umpqua Bank. ‘The offer of the deed-in-lieu is interesting, but it’s usually not going to work out well from the bank’s perspective.'”

“At the same time, it’s ‘no coincidence’ that the conference was held in San Francisco, also for the second year, according to Heather Turner, CEO of Portland-based Tamarack Capital Partners, a hospitality-focused investment firm. For Bay Area investors, the transition from a white-glove local bank like Silicon Valley Bank or First Republic to a big national bank like JPMorgan has been ‘one of the most unenjoyable experiences in the history of mankind,’ according to Riaz Taplin, founder and CEO of Oakland-based multifamily developer Riaz Capital.”

From CBC News. “Housing prices could drop slightly in Metro Vancouver amid ongoing political and economic uncertainty in Canada, some real estate experts say. Realtor Steve Saretsky said that while it used to take one or two weeks for a condo to sell, it can now take two or three months. Investors are also buying less, he said. ‘Unsold inventory on developer balance sheets is at all-time highs,’ Saretsky said. This, he said, is because ‘the investor base really disappeared, which is to say the math simply does not work anymore.’ For investors who already own, Saretsky said the unstable economy, declining rents and stagnating prices mean many are trying to sell and get out of the market. ‘The reality is, when you have record inventory for sale or you’ve got six or seven months of inventory on the market, sometimes the only way to stand out [as a seller] is to have the lowest price, right?'”

“University of British Columbia Sauder School of Business associate professor Tom Davidoff said potential buyers may want to consider giving lower-than-normal offers. ‘If I were a buyer and I didn’t need a place desperately, if I had a place I was comfortable that I could stay, I think I would be doing low-ball offers,’ he said. ‘I think bidding five, 10, 15 per cent below asking. Why not? Take some swings.'”

Newmarket Today in Canada. “Aurora, Newmarket and the Greater Toronto Area continued to see a delay to the usually busy spring housing market, according to April’s home sale numbers from the Toronto Regional Real Estate Board. Dylan Silbernagel, a sales representative with Keller Williams Realty Centres, said the first three months of the year were the slowest for home sales since 2011. ‘Buyers have just truly disappeared from the market,’ said Silbernagel, saying ‘uncertainty caused by Canada’s federal election and U.S. tariffs are impacting sales. The median prices for detached houses sold in Aurora dropped dramatically month-to-month, going from $1,633,000 in March to $1,361,000 in April. That decline means the median has dipped just below the median from 2021, according to Silbernagel.”

“Newmarket saw an even bigger decrease compared to its composite MLS home index price. The town’s housing market was down compared to its benchmark of $1,122,200, dropping by 7.33 per cent year-on-year, the second biggest decline in York Region, behind only Markham. Throughout the Greater Toronto Area, home sales were up month-to-month compared with March, going from 5,011 to 5,601. That’s down significantly from April 2024, when there were 7,302 sales. Some property types are seeing bigger declines, with sales of condo apartments declining by 30.4 per cent, sales of townhouses dropping 22.9 per cent and sales of detached homes falling 21.7 per cent.”

Insauga in Canada. “As prices drop, many homeowners have taken losses on property sales. The most recent example is a luxury home that just sold for a $1.35 million loss in Toronto. There have been many examples of homeowners who have sold for big losses in the last year. These homes were purchased at peak high prices in early 2022. But this latest example, a home at 227 Strathallan Wood, near Lawrence Avenue and Bathurst Street in Toronto, was purchased in 2023. The four-bedroom, seven-bathroom home sold for $8,350,000 in June 2023, according to online real estate records. The home was listed for $7,549,000 in March and just sold for $7 million this week. The Lytton Park home is fairly new, completed in 2022, according to the listing.”

This Post Has 70 Comments
  1. ‘Typically, his business is evenly split between buyers and sellers. But this year, he says, almost everyone is looking to sell. ‘We just have no Canadians that are really buying properties right now’

    According to his website Miles is in Arizona, which probably means the Phoenix area. IIRC it’s Scottsdale.

  2. ‘If I were a buyer and I didn’t need a place desperately, if I had a place I was comfortable that I could stay, I think I would be doing low-ball offers,’ he said. ‘I think bidding five, 10, 15 per cent below asking. Why not? Take some swings’

    That’s the spirit Tom!

    1. Nah, I won’t be submitting “lowball” offers until the carnage is playing out so brutally that even the most delusional greedheads are in full-blown panic.

      1. I must admit in the last crash to getting a perverse pleasure out of emailing realtors with lowballs and watching them completely lose their marbles. And then getting emails from them some time later saying that they’ll consider the offer. Then I’d lowball them again. Hey, it’s something to do when there’s nothing on tv.

        1. if you don’t accept this one, the offers can always get worse.

          And then, when they accept it long after the expiration time on that offer. “I’m sorry that offer has expired, how about this much lower offer”

      2. “…until the carnage is playing out so brutally…”

        “Where there is blood on the streets, buy property” —Baron de Rothschild

  3. ‘We see about 50 percent more active listings on the market. In fact, right now, there are about 24,000 or 25,000 homes active on the market in Colorado. This is one of the highest levels we’ve seen in a little over a decade…Last month, we actually saw about 29 percent of active listings on the market reduce their price, which is in line with the rest of the country, but probably on the higher end, when compared to some of the other states that don’t have quite as much excess inventory as Colorado does’

    All Time High Larry!

  4. ‘The borrower is actually coming to the bank and saying, ‘Look, will you accept a deed-in-lieu? We’re done. We don’t want to go through the foreclosure process. We don’t want to take on default interest rates. We just want to hand it back to you’

    That’s some sound lending right there Dan.

  5. ‘There have been many examples of homeowners who have sold for big losses in the last year. These homes were purchased at peak high prices in early 2022. But this latest example, a home at 227 Strathallan Wood, near Lawrence Avenue and Bathurst Street in Toronto, was purchased in 2023. The four-bedroom, seven-bathroom home sold for $8,350,000 in June 2023, according to online real estate records. The home was listed for $7,549,000 in March and just sold for $7 million this week’

    This is a classic knife catcher scenario. Toronto igloos had already taken an a$$ pounding in 2023.

  6. “I’m just being faced with a decision to rent it out or hold and keep it on the market a little bit longer.’”

    Your only non idiotic choice is to drop the price and get out!

    1. Ignore those naysaying low-ballers, greedheads! Yer listing is SPECIAL! You stick to yer guns and Shirley the Fall Miracle Revival will be just around the corner! Time is on yer side, so dig in those heels and you will be rewarded!

      1. and make sure and rent it out in the meantime. I’m sure they wont’ squat or damage anything in the meantime. You’ll totally get more money that way. Hold on, I’m sure it will get better.

        (hahahahahahahah)

    2. They didn’t give enough information for me to pinpoint the house, but houses in that area are ~700K, for 3-4 bedrooms. Any “family” buying this house better be made up of two six-figure-income spouses with 1-2 healthy children who don’t mind cheap staycations and public school.

  7. Fortune – Trump calls emptying U.S. ports a ‘good thing’ despite supply-chain panic because ‘that means we lose less money’.

    https://archive.ph/mmLkp#selection-789.0-789.113

    Shipping volumes at U.S. ports have decreased drastically as a result of sweeping tariffs. Despite supply-chain professionals warning the port traffic slowdown could lead to goods shortages and increased consumer prices, President Donald Trump said emptying ports was a “good thing” because it means less trade with China.

    As logistics professionals sound the alarms on emptying U.S. ports as a result of steep tariffs, President Donald Trump said those major import slowdowns are actually a boon.

    Following Trump’s introduction of sweeping tariffs, shipping volumes have fallen considerably, according to data from container-tracking software company Vizion. In the period between the five weeks before and five weeks after Trump introduced and implemented his tariff plan, virtually all major U.S. ports saw a decline in the number of container books. The Port of Portland in Oregon saw a 50% drop in exports, and the Port of Los Angeles, the U.S.’s largest outpost, had 17% lower exports. From the week ending April 28, Vizion reported a 43% week-over-week decrease in containers.

    Port of Los Angeles executive director Gene Seroka warned last month of a “precipitous drop” in shipping volumes, saying American retailers will have fully stocked shelves for only about another six weeks.

    Trump not only acknowledged the shipping slowdown in a Thursday press briefing announcing a trade deal with the UK; he seemed heartened by it.

    “We’re seeing as a result that ports here in the U.S., the traffic has really slowed and now thousands of dockworkers and truck drivers are worried about their jobs,” a reporter said in the press briefing.
    “That means we lose less money,” Trump said. “When you say it slowed down, that’s a good thing, not a bad thing.”

    Trump has doubled down on the need for tariffs to help reverse a trade deficit to China, which he says is $1 trillion.

    “From 500 billion to 1.1 trillion…frankly if we didn’t do business we would’ve been better off,” he said on Thursday.

    China exported goods worth about $525 billion to the U.S. last year, which accounts for about 15% of its exports, according to data from China’s General Administration of Customs. The U.S. estimates it received about $439 billion in Chinese exports in 2024, with $143.5 billion of U.S. goods exported to China. The goods-trade deficit was about $295 billion in 2024.

    Trump has seemed to waver on the severity with which to tax China. As of Friday, he’s floating an 80% levy on Chinese goods, a substantial cut from the 145% tariff already in place, though some investors warn the steep tax would still be prohibitive to trade.

    “The Trump administration is delivering relief to the American people from the disaster of Bidenomics while laying the groundwork for a long-term restoration of American Greatness,” White House deputy press secretary Kush Desai told Fortune in a statement, citing data from the White House reporting a 22% increase in gross domestic investment in March, as well as cooling inflation, albeit before much of the tariffs’ implementation.

    Desai told Fortune the U.S. can’t rely on foreign imports because of the Covid-era pharmaceuticals and computer-chip shortages.
    Logistics and trade concerns

    While Trump claims plummeting U.S. port traffic will help save money, supply-chain professionals have sounded the alarm on the ramifications of these shipping disruptions to the logistics industry and consumers alike.

    The threat of tariffs caused companies to pull forward shipments to avoid the taxes, but the influx of goods now may mean either excess inventory or shortages down the line, Peter Sand, chief analyst of freight analytics platform Xeneta, previously told Fortune. Shortages may mean higher prices for companies, which are likely to get passed down to consumers. To manage excess inventory, companies may have to invest more heavily in storage warehouses or ground freight for deliveries.

    “Global supply chains work really well when they can go steady, so when you have stop-and-go, or when you have all of a sudden a rush of cargo like you see right now, that’s really putting a strain on global supply chains, maritime supply chains,” Sand said.

    A decline in port activity could have adverse effects on labor as well. Port of LA executive director Seroka told CNN that shipment slowdowns could mean less reliable work schedules for dock workers and truckers.

    Beyond supply-chain woes, some economists take issue with the foundation of Trump’s arguments for tariffs, saying that a trade deficit with China isn’t entirely a bad thing.

    “We get incredibly valuable things from China,” Jason Furman, Harvard University professor of economic policy, told Fortune. “If we want to diversify that, it’s something we should do over time, not by just halting all the ships coming in today.”

    While trade deficits can exacerbate a dependency on another country and create some economic vulnerabilities, Furman said, they also provide desirable products to the U.S. Other economists argue tariffs would effectively sever trade with China, ending a period of expanding globalization.

    According to Furman, the U.S. should stop focusing on steep taxes to sectors like consumer goods, such as produce, clothing and toys. Trump, seeming to admit tariffs could create some shortages for consumers, said last week that little girls can make do with two dolls, instead of 30.

    “Tariffs on targeted sectors that are important for national security could play a role,” Furman said. “But discouraging American children from buying dolls is not a way to make America great again.”

    1. Oh no! Less commie plastic trash that will end up in a landill within two years, how will this country survive?

      I bought a 40″ TeeVee for $140 from WallyMart before they got liberated. My Sony DVD player is apparently a subscription model now, have to buy a new one for $35 (used to be $35) when it dies every two years.

      Meanwhile, I have an Osterizer blender older than I am that still works, built in USA. Visiting apartments Back East that were built before 1950, always notice the small amount of closet space. People didn’t need to own enough useless sh*t that they have to rent a storage locker.

    2. “We get incredibly valuable things from China,” Jason Furman, Harvard University professor of economic policy, told Fortune.

      Like the Wu flu?

    3. Even Danielle DiMartino Booth has joined in on the Trump hatred. In an interview on VRIC youtube (Jay Martin), she — like all these dang pundits — blasted Trump for being “unplanned” in his tariff policy. She wants “diplomacy” in applying tarrifs to ease the transition time. But in the same breath she wanted some global trade policy, not deals with individual countries.

      She partly has a point. It didn’t take long for us to lose ALL of our manufacturing to China. You can’t really buy ANY houshold item like a frying pan or a rake or a picture frame or a lunch box, without being beholden to China. But at the same time, Trump has to do something. We can’t let ourselves die off slowly. And individual deals are the best deals, since you can play competitors off each other. And nobody is better at that than Mr. Art of the Deal.

  8. “Home buyers in Colorado have more choices and still have time to shop around as the housing market in Colorado remains balanced, according to experts.

    Those “experts” are REIC touts and shills whose paychecks depend on denying that Housing Bubble 2.0 is bursting. Colorado greedheads are still unserious people, as shown by their delusional wish prices, but inventories keep climbing and more prospective marks are seeing through the “experts'” lies & dissembling.

    1. The metro Front Range consumer economy is cash out refi / HELOC and has been for a decade.

      The InstaLife these people flex on social media all rests upon a giant mountain of debt, debt that they will never pay off and will never be able to refinance again.

      And when the inevitable divorce happens (it always does) they will lose everything.

  9. For investors who already own, Saretsky said the unstable economy, declining rents and stagnating prices mean many are trying to sell and get out of the market. ‘

    Die, speculator scum.

  10. ‘I honestly feel like it’s just uncertain times right now,’ explained Kilby.

    Your feelings have nothing to do with anything, Greedhead Brandi. You are an unserious seller who is clinging to a delusional wish prices. Either get to sawin’ and slashin’ like you mean it, or chase the market down – your call.

  11. ‘If I were a buyer and I didn’t need a place desperately, if I had a place I was comfortable that I could stay, I think I would be doing low-ball offers,’ he said.

    I’ve got a better idea, Tom. That is, exercise strategic patience and hunker down in my comfy rental watching inventory climb even as thousands of Yellen Bux “value” is evaporating each month from shacks all along the Front Range. The real cratering hasn’t even started yet, so I’m content to wait on the sidelines and let the knife-catchers get impaled.

  12. “As prices drop, many homeowners have taken losses on property sales. The most recent example is a luxury home that just sold for a $1.35 million loss in Toronto.

    I loves me a good “schlonged FBs” story the first thing in the morning.

  13. The four-bedroom, seven-bathroom home sold for $8,350,000 in June 2023, according to online real estate records. The home was listed for $7,549,000 in March and just sold for $7 million this week.

    I’m guessing there was a 100 percent correlation between the FOMO lemmings who bought at the peak of the scamdemic-era housing bubble courtesy of the BoC’s “stimulus,” and the zealous support among K-dans for the persecution of Canadian truckers and others who did not want to take the clot shot or go along with globalist-authored “mandates.” That makes these Canadian FBs’ huge financial losses even more gratifying.

  14. Outside of COVID shock, Ontario’s unemployment is now at its highest since late 2013

    Ontario’s unemployment rate ticked up again last month, according to Statistics Canada, reaching its highest level in more than a decade, with the exception of the initial economic shocks of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    The latest Labour Force Survey data shows unemployment in Ontario hit 7.8 per cent in April, up 0.3 percentage points from March and marking three consecutive months of overall job losses in the province.

    Outside of the initial months of the pandemic, when unemployment peaked at 14.2 per cent in May 2020, last month’s unemployment figure is the highest in Ontario since October 2013. Only Newfoundland and Labrador had a higher unemployment rate, at 9.6 per cent.

    The overwhelming majority of the 35,000 total jobs lost were in the manufacturing sector, Statistics Canada says. Ontario lost more manufacturing jobs last month than any other province in Canada.

    In the Windsor area — the province’s auto manufacturing heartland and a region that has already been shaken by U.S. President Donald Trump’s ongoing global trade war — the unemployment rate increased 1.4 percentage points, up to 10.7 per cent.

    Marit Stiles, leader of the Official Opposition, criticized Premier Doug Ford for his handling of the issue.

    “If this is not a wake-up call for Premier Ford, I don’t know what is,” Stiles said in an NDP news release on Friday. “What will it take for the Premier to abandon his wait-and-see approach and take real action to keep people working?”

    Windsor West MPP Lisa Gretzky called out the premier over the unemployment rate increase.

    “Thousands of people in Windsor are losing their jobs,” Gretzky said in the same NDP release. “Where is the urgency from this Premier? We cannot sit by and watch good paying jobs leave because of Trump’s unjustifiable tariffs.”

    Meanwhile, the province’s independent Financial Accountability Office predicted last week that further U.S. tariffs and Canada’s retaliation could result in some 119,000 fewer jobs in Ontario by next year, pushing unemployment upward by another 1.1 percentage points.

    https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.7531054

    Wa happened to my elbows?

  15. US govt’s science foundation purges 37 divisions, equity unit among casualties

    The US government’s National Science Foundation (NSF) is reportedly axing more than three dozen divisions, including its equity-in-STEM unit, while prepping staff layoffs and yanking over a billion dollars in recently awarded grants. The purge has already sparked legal action and congressional scrutiny.

    On Thursday, the journal Science reported that NSF staff have been told that 37 divisions across the federal agency’s all eight directorates will be eliminated, accompanied by a number of layoffs among its 1,700 employees.

    For those unfamiliar with the NSF’s role, the org does not conduct its own research but serves as a federal funding body, allocating public money to support universities, institutions, and small businesses in advancing scientific progress, education, and innovation across the United States.

    The NSF’s temporary workforce is set to be reduced to 70 employees, from 368 currently. Those 70 temporary positions are supposed to support Presidential priorities in AI, biotech, nuclear energy, quantum science, and translational science.

    All remote federal workers not already working full-time, in-person in a federal building will be required to do so by June 16, 2025, with limited exceptions. The Division of Equity for Excellence in STEM (EES), which is within the Directorate for STEM Education, will be “sunset,” with layoffs to be completed by July 12, 2025.

    Tomasz Durakiewicz, program director for condensed matter physics, in the Division of Materials Research at the foundation, said in a post that NSF leadership on Friday “announced the destruction of [the Directorate for STEM Education], especially the EES Division.”

    “EES is being decimated, people fired, the division dissolved, programs and awards canceled,” he said. “What is happening now to their mission and to all our colleagues there is shameful and deplorable. People are in tears, watching years of their efforts and impact, often directed at those who need federal funding the most, being disintegrated.”

    Some NSF grants related to diversity were cut in April. As of May 2, according to the letter, NSF had terminated nearly 1,400 awarded grants worth over $1 billion. The science-funding body also capped indirect cost reimbursements to research institutions at 15 percent and paused all grants.

    https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/09/nsf_axes_37_division/

    1. “EES is being decimated, people fired, the division dissolved, programs and awards canceled,” he said. “What is happening now to their mission and to all our colleagues there is shameful and deplorable.

      No, it’s glorious. Yet another FedGov agency subverted & weaponized against me and mine is being kicked to the curb. Learn to pick crops, parasites.

    2. “What is happening now to their mission and to all our colleagues there is shameful and deplorable. People are in tears”

      Last I checked, the deplorables won the 2024 election, so cry harder, loosers.

      They won 2020 too, but that election was stolen.

    3. All remote federal workers not already working full-time, in-person in a federal building will be required to do so by June 16, 2025, with limited exceptions.

      Quick reminder:
      Telework: working at home in any capacity. Can be anything from a single snow day to fixed 2 days/wk telework to 3 months temporary telework to recover from a medical condition.
      Remote work: Full-time permanent work at home. This is the Holy Grail.

      But, what is a “federal building?”
      1. One of your agency’s field offices (if you have them)
      2. Generic large buildings used as swing space for all agencies. There are 6-7 of these, in DC, NYC, San Fran, Denver, Chicago, Atlanta and maybe Seattle.

      The question is, are you limited to one of your agency’s buildings and the federal buildings, or can you work from ANY federal building? If you work for the National Science Foundation, and you’re nowhere near these buildings, can you make a deal to commute to the local HUD office? We don’t have a clear answer, but my guess is no. In which case, all of the remote workers would have to either relocate or quit.

  16. Next steps remain unclear for deported migrants in Panama City

    Hundreds of people who have recently been deported from the U.S. to Panama are desperately searching for a way out of their predicament, which leaves them facing detention, desertion in a foreign third country or fatal persecution in their home nations.

    After traveling thousands of miles to reach the U.S., around 300 of them awaited their fate, or at least the next harrowing experience, at a Panama City hotel in March.

    Many of them expected procedural detention when crossing the border in San Diego and El Paso in February to legally seek asylum. They thought their stories of escaping violence and death would permit their stay in the U.S. To their surprise, their stay lasted less than a week until they were deported by plane from San Diego to Panamá on February 12th.

    As they waited for their impending placement at a detention camp near the treacherous Darién jungle between Panama and Colombia, the 299 deported migrants were held in the Decapolis Hotel in Panama City with limited access to the outside world for over a week. They held signs that read “Help Us,” illuminated by the dim lights of their hotel room turned jail cell. Gradually, the hotel emptied as buses shipped them off in waves.

    Among the passengers in the first wave of buses from Darién was Hayatullah, 29. In 2022, he fled Afghanistan. After attempting to first relocate to Pakistan, then Iran and then Latin America, he finally decided to seek asylum in the U.S. by crossing the border at Tijuana in February. He figured the detention was procedural. “I was very excited. I thought that I had the chance to [receive] my asylum … but no.”

    During his five days in San Diego, he said he and fellow detainees remained handcuffed in a single room, unable to go outside. After unknowingly signing a warrant of deportation written only in English, he was placed on a plane departing that night. He traveled with chains around his ankles and wrists as the plane headed to Panama.

    He described the Darién detention camp as “terrible.” Small rooms were packed tight with dozens of other detainees. There was no air conditioning amid the dense jungle climate. Access to food was limited. Every bathroom break included guards. Open showers exposed him to strangers he just met. “It was very bad,” he said.

    Alongside Hayatullah was Aleks, 38. After criticizing the Russian government on social media, he said he was repeatedly threatened with imprisonment or given a choice to join the Russian military — neither option appealed to him.

    Aleks believed his support for Ukraine and escape from political violence warranted his asylum claim to stay in the U.S. “I thought everything would be okay until I was inside the plane going to Panama,” he said.

    Sitting inside the Hotel Via España, where he and fellow migrants stayed in the days following their arrival from Darién, he spoke very few words. He felt betrayed by the country that promised freedom and justice for all.

    “I would not be a burden on the government,” he said. “I would work and pay my taxes. I want to contribute to the United States’ economy.”

    Like Hayatullah, Aleks remains in Panama. “There’s no more hope that they’ll help us get back to the U.S., so I’ll rely on myself,” he said.

    Sathesh thought the U.S. government’s condemnation of Sinahelese war crimes would permit his stay. Immigration authorities had other plans. Once believing in America’s “great democracy, human rights and personal freedom,” Sathesh felt betrayed.

    Sathesh’s journey, like others, is still halted in Panama. “We are orphans in Panama now,” he said.

    As of April, 48 of the original 299 remain at a shelter run by Fe y Alegría in Panama City. Among them are Hayatullah, Aleks and Sathesh. Others, like Anna, have continued to journey to their next destination. Some have headed south to Brazil, others to Mexico and Costa Rica. No matter where, the sentiment remains the same — next steps are unclear, and human stories hang in the balance.

    “I cannot go back. It is impossible,” Hayatullah said.

    “I feel lost,” Aleks said.

    “Life has no future,” Sathesh said.

    “Is this not against humanity?” asked Anna.

    https://cronkitenews.azpbs.org/2025/05/09/future-uncertain-migrants-deported-panama/

    1. The all you can eat buffet of Free Sh*t is closed.

      No free hotel rooms, no free Section 8, no free $5,000 debit cards, no free Obamaphones, no free food stamps, no free plane tickets to fly all over the country. U.S. taxpayers owe you NOTHING.

      1. “I would not be a burden on the government,” he said. “I would work and pay my taxes. I want to contribute to the United States’ economy.”

        Pray tell, just what would he contribute?

    2. Hundreds of people who have recently been deported from the U.S. to Panama are desperately searching for a way out of their predicament, which leaves them facing detention, desertion in a foreign third country or fatal persecution in their home nations.

      After traveling thousands of miles to reach the U.S., around 300 of them awaited their fate, or at least the next harrowing experience, at a Panama City hotel in March.

      Funny how they were so cunning when the trip was north. They were unstoppable, trudging through jungles. But now, going home is an impossible task. I do get that they aren’t excited about failing to grab the brass ring on FJB’s Free Sh!t Carousel and now have to go home.

    3. I was very excited. I thought that I had the chance to [receive] my asylum … but no.”

      Notice the phrasing here: MY asylum, like it’s a god-given right.

    4. I would need to know more about their stories, but if the stories are true, maybe they really are refugees. Although at some point I wonder if they were deliberately getting in trouble at home as a reason to claim asylum. Like, one X post supportive of Ukraine gets you on the gravy train in the US.

      I do hope that if we can deport all the gang members and border crossers and fake asylums, we can start admitting real refugees again.

  17. 18 of 104 detained in Colorado Springs nightclub raid already had deportation orders, ICE says

    Suspected Sinaloa Cartel member and drug distributor among detainees

    Federal agents captured 18 immigrants facing deportation during their April 27 raid on an unlicensed Colorado Springs nightclub, according to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

    An ICE spokesperson wrote in an email Friday that the agency detained 104 people who were illegally present in the country during the raid, including immigrants from Guatemala, Cuba, El Salvador, Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, Nicaragua, Chile and Honduras.

    The Drug Enforcement Administration initially reported 114 had been taken into federal custody. When asked about the discrepancy, the spokesperson wrote that he could only confirm how many people ICE arrested.

    Among the 104, 18 already had been ordered to leave the United States, and 14 had previously been charged with or convicted of crimes, including a suspected Sinaloa Cartel member and a suspected drug distributor for the group. Others had been previously convicted of DUI, drug crimes and other charges, the spokesperson wrote.

    A dozen firearms as well as cocaine and methamphetamine were seized during the raid on the clandestine club, which for months had prompted 911 calls from neighbors concerned about shootings and drug trafficking in the area, Jonathan Pullen, special agent in charge of the DEA’s Rocky Mountain Division, told NewsNation last month.

    The ICE spokesperson wrote Friday the 86 detainees who are not subject to a final order of removal are being held by ICE pending immigration proceedings.

    At least two other people were arrested at the time by Colorado Springs police, and Pullen said 17 members of the military were found inside of the club. The Department of the Army Criminal Investigation Division is investigating the servicemembers’ involvement along with the DEA.

    One Fort Carson soldier, Staff Sgt. Juan Gabriel Orona-Rodriguez, was arrested April 30 on suspicion that he dealt cocaine and offered to sell illegal weapons to an undocumented immigrant while working security at the club.

    https://www.denverpost.com/2025/05/09/colorado-springs-nightclub-detainees-include-18-deportation-ice/

    1. I expect the El Paso County Democrat Party has held emergency meetings with state and national-level Democrat-Bolshevik officials to frantically try to derail any deportations and get all charges reduced or thrown out.

    2. One Fort Carson soldier, Staff Sgt. Juan Gabriel Orona-Rodriguez, was arrested April 30 on suspicion that he dealt cocaine and offered to sell illegal weapons to an undocumented immigrant while working security at the club.

      Had Kamala Harris been elected, soldiers like Juan would be spearheading the gun raids against patriots and anyone else resisting the NWO agenda.

    3. “An ICE spokesperson wrote in an email Friday that the agency detained 104 people who were illegally present in the country during the raid, including immigrants from Guatemala, Cuba, El Salvador, Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, Nicaragua, Chile and Honduras.”

      That’s quite a haul, and the diversity is awesome! Maybe ICE should establish a donkey show tour around the country?

  18. Does Cockroach Theory apply to housing?

    For example, if the mainstream media reports that prices are falling in one part of the U.S., is it safe to assume they are falling in many other areas?

    1. The Housing Market Is a Bubble Full of Fraud, and It’s Going To Pop

      The U.S. is in a massive housing bubble. Prices are artificially high due primarily to the downstream effects of financialization. Localized supply and demand dynamics — which today are also downstream of financialization — are a mess. Decades of housing subsidies, down payment assistance, artificially low interest rates, money printing and endless bank support have turned the American home into a financial product first and a place of shelter second. The extent of the distortion is unprecedented, something covered in “Escaping the Housing Trap: The Strong Towns Response to the Housing Crisis.”

      https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2024/8/19/the-housing-market-is-a-bubble-full-of-fraud-and-its-going-to-pop

      1. “Decades of housing subsidies, down payment assistance, artificially low interest rates, money printing and endless bank support have turned the American home into a financial product first and a place of shelter second.”

        I might be missing it, but those mostly sound like Democrat-favored affordable housing programs with roots going back to Bill Clinton’s time in the White House. Does the current administration plan to continue these?

        1. How Trump plans to get government out of the mortgage business
          March 26, 2025
          Paige Sutherland and Meghna Chakrabarti
          The Fannie Mae headquarters building in Washington.
          (AP Photo/J. David Ake, File)

          Mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been under government conservatorship since 2008. President Trump wants to privatize them.

          But what could that mean for America’s mortgage market?

          Today, On Point: How Trump plans to get government out of the mortgage business.

          Guests

          David Reiss, clinical professor of law at Cornell Law School and Cornell Tech. Expert in housing finance, housing policy, real estate and affordable housing.

          Transcript

          Part I

          MEGHNA CHAKRABARTI: Around 2006 and 2007, there was a hidden toxin flowing through the American financial system. It moved from house to house in the form of very risky mortgages. Those high-risk loans were then bought by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, huge mortgage finance firms.

          Then in 2008, the housing market crashed. It threatened to wreck the entire global financial system, and it did wreck Fannie and Freddie. The two companies lost a combined $109 billion. The U.S. government, aka you, the taxpayer, then took over. Here’s then Treasury Secretary, Hank Paulson at a congressional hearing on September 23rd, 2008.

          HANK PAULSON: And what we did was we came in. We stabilized the market, mortgage rates went down, so that capital could flow through our system. And I can just say, I for one, and I know that the other witnesses feel very glad about this. Thank goodness that was done, and they were stabilized before we had some investment banks report their earnings, or let me tell you, this would be a much more serious situation than it is today.

          CHAKRABARTI: Fannie and Freddie were put under government conservatorship, and as you heard Paulson say, the housing market slowly recovered, but this conservatorship was never meant to be permanent. Mark Calabria is the former director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. It’s a position he held in President Trump’s first term. The FHFA regulates and supervises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

          Here’s Calabria on the podcast, Voice of Appraisal with Phil Crawford just last month on why he says it’s time to end the conservatorship.

          CALABRIA: I would say our expectations was maybe a conservatorship would go six months. Not a decade plus. And to put it in context, the longest ever bank conservatorship was 18 months.

          Whereas Fannie and Freddie are almost a couple more years. Today it’ll be 18 years. So this has gone on a lot longer than Congress intended. And I think it’s done significant harm to the companies and to FHFA and I think lulled a lot of people into a sense of complacency about our mortgage markets.

          CHAKRABARTI: In Trump’s first presidency, Calabria actually tried unsuccessfully to end the conservatorship.

          CALABRIA: When I took over FHFA as director in 2019, we immediately started to repair and prepare the companies and FHFA for an exit of the companies from conservatorship. Now, unfortunately, I was in place about 11 months before the pandemic hit.

          … And like all of us, the pandemic sort of let’s say took over our lives and threw a lot of other things sideways. And I’d go as far to say that had it not been for the pandemic, I feel highly certain that the companies would be out of conservatorship today.

          CHAKRABARTI: Now that President Trump is back in the White House, it seems that he intends to get the job done this time around. Mark Calabria has returned to Trump’s administration, this time working on housing policy at the Office of Management and Budget. Bill Pulte is now director of FHFA, and he just made the highly unusual move of appointing himself chair of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, making the regulator and the regulated basically the same.

          Pulte also fired 14 of the 25 sitting board members at Fannie and Freddie. A shakeup many are suspecting is a first step in leading these two companies out of government control and into privatization. We’re talking about a huge part of the U.S. economy that underpins the housing market. So this hour, we want to explore what privatization of Fannie and Freddie actually means, what it should look like, and how it might have an impact on homeowners and the housing market.

          https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2025/03/26/government-mortgage-fannie-mae-finance-trump

          1. “How Trump plans to get government out of the mortgage business.”

            Housing Bubble, meet Pin.

    2. Norada Real Estate Investments

      4 States Facing the Major Housing Market Crash or Correction

      May 9, 2025 by Marco Santarelli

      Are you feeling a bit uneasy about the housing market lately? You’re not alone. For years, it felt like home prices could only go up, up, up! But whispers of a potential slowdown, or even a downturn, are getting louder. If you’re a homeowner or hoping to become one, understanding where the risks are highest is crucial. So, which areas should you be watching closely?

      The latest data points to California, Illinois, and pockets of Florida and the New York City metropolitan area as the regions facing the most significant risk of a major housing market downturn. Let’s dive into why these states are particularly vulnerable and what it could mean for you.

      https://www.noradarealestate.com/blog/states-facing-the-major-housing-market-crash-or-correction/

    3. Real Estate
      ‘It’s a raw deal’: The ugly truth about America’s homebuying outlook
      By James Rodriguez
      House on a money lawn.
      Kiersten Essenpreis for BI
      May 7, 2025, 1:04 AM PT

      – It’s a tough market for homebuyers given the economic uncertainty and high prices.

      – Yet house hunters also enjoy more options — and bargaining power — than they’ve had in years.

      – This is the second installment in BI’s six-part series on making major life decisions during this period of massive change from Washington.

      Here’s a fact you may find either comforting or dismaying: Even a housing economist can’t tell whether it’s a good time to buy a home.

      Chen Zhao, the head of economics research at the popular real estate marketplace Redfin, is still trying to figure it out for herself. When I called Zhao recently to get her take on America’s real estate market, she had just spent the morning touring a home in Manhattan. Walking out of the apartment, she was left with a gnawing question.

      “I was like, ‘Should I be buying a house right now?'” Zhao told me. “The answer is complicated.”

      https://www.businessinsider.com/is-now-good-time-to-buy-home-real-estate-agents-2025-5

      1. “I was like, ‘Should I be buying a house right now?’” Zhao told me. “The answer is complicated.”

        Thank the Lord there’s one honest housing economist out there!

  19. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
    Mortgages
    last reviewed: JAN 02, 2025
    What is a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure?
    English
    Español

    A deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is an arrangement where you voluntarily turn over ownership of your home to the lender to avoid the foreclosure process.

    A deed-in-lieu of foreclosure may be an option if you are trying to move out of your home and avoid foreclosure. This may help you avoid being responsible for any amount left on the mortgage and avoid foreclosure, both of which can affect your ability to purchase another home in the future. If you are considering a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, make sure that it covers the entire amount of money you still owe on the mortgage loan.

    If you are unable to pay your mortgage, you need to take action before the bank begins foreclosure proceedings. The worst thing you can do is nothing. Learn how you can avoid foreclosure, or see our handout for more information. You may also have options that allow you to stay in your home, so you should contact your lender first and see what options they can offer you.

    If you’re considering a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, also ask your lender or servicer about help with your relocation expenses through private programs that are sometimes called “cash-for-keys.”

    If you live in a state where you are responsible for any deficiency, which is a difference between the value of your property and the amount you still owe on your mortgage loan, you can ask your lender to waive the deficiency. If the lender agrees, ask for the waiver in writing and keep it for your records. You may still incur a tax liability, so you may want to speak with a tax professional or attorney.

    To learn more about your options, or to plan your next steps if you choose the deed-in-lieu of foreclosure option, use our Find a Housing Counselor tool to find a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)-approved housing counseling agency.

    https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/what-is-a-deed-in-lieu-of-foreclosure-en-291/

    1. “This may help you avoid being responsible for any amount left on the mortgage and avoid foreclosure, both of which can affect your ability to purchase another home in the future.”

      Sounds like a scam.

    2. I wonder why there is suddenly a plethora of helpful online advice on what to do if your mortgage is 100 meters underwater?

      1. Rocket Mortgage
        Mortgage basics
        Mortgage terminology
        What is a deed in lieu of foreclosure?
        Deed in lieu of foreclosure: What is it and is it right for you?
        By Victoria Araj
        Mar 11, 2024•7-minute read
        Aerial shot of a neighborhood, showcasing houses, streets, and community living.

        Your lender will have to act if you fall behind on your mortgage payments. A deed in lieu agreement might help you avoid the repercussions of a foreclosure. A foreclosure is the legal process in which the lender who owns your mortgage takes your property back.

        Let’s look at how a deed in lieu agreement works and how it differs from a foreclosure. We’ll also show you a few alternative ways to avoid foreclosure without a deed in lieu agreement.

        What is a deed in lieu of foreclosure?

        A deed in lieu agreement is an arrangement that gives your mortgage lender the deed to your home. Homeowners agree to deed in lieu agreements to avoid foreclosure.

        Foreclosures show up on your credit report. This can make it virtually impossible for you to buy another home for years. A deed in lieu of foreclosure can also show up on your credit report and negatively impact your credit score. This may affect your ability to obtain another mortgage depending on the lender and mortgage product.

        When you hand over the deed, the lender removes the property lien and takes ownership of your home. This allows the lender to recoup some losses without forcing you into foreclosure. The lender also relieves what you still owe on the mortgage. Many homeowners seek deed in lieu agreements when their mortgage ends up “underwater.” An underwater mortgage means a borrower owes more on their home than it’s worth.

        https://www.rocketmortgage.com/learn/deed-in-lieu#:~:text=Drawbacks%20of%20a%20deed%20in%20lieu%20Negative,deed%20in%20lieu%20on%20your%20credit%20report.

    1. The Cool Down
      Tesla hit with stunning sales news that could point to larger trend: ‘We are at a worrying level’
      “Uncertainty for all our businesses.”
      by Susan Elizabeth Turek
      May 10, 2025
      “Uncertainty for all our businesses.”
      Photo Credit: Deposit photos.com

      Tesla sales continued to plummet in France in April, and analysts are eyeing whether the latest troubling news for the automaker could be indicative of a larger issue.

      What’s happening?

      Fortune reported this month that Tesla sales fell 59% in France for April compared to April 2024 figures. French car body PFA also tracked 44% fewer registrations compared to the same period in 2024.

      Tesla’s slump in the European Union’s third-biggest car market is in line with its sales across the bloc, with the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association documenting a 45% drop.

      Why is this important?

      Analysts suggest Tesla’s troubles indicate a larger economic problem could be looming for consumers, according to the report.

      While CEO Elon Musk’s approach as the de facto head of the cost-cutting U.S. Department of Government Efficiency and political involvement overseas has damaged the Tesla brand, contributing to the sharp sales decline in multiple markets, car sales in France overall also slowed in April — and that includes sales of EVs.

      “We are at a worrying level in the market, which is very low compared to the pre-Covid period,” PFA head Nicolas Le Bigot told Fortune, adding that French buyers are in “a situation of economic uncertainty” exacerbated by the Trump administration’s trade war.

      https://www.thecooldown.com/green-business/tesla-sales-decline-france-europe/

      1. “Tesla hit with stunning sales news that could point to larger trend”

        Cockroach Theory is everywhere!

    2. Would TSLA stock go up or down if Musk were replaced? I guess we’ll never know unless he’s replaced.

      One thing we do know:

      TSLA dropping like a lead anchor while he’s currently active as CEO. Elon is the lead in the anchor.

      1. Elon Musk Thinks Tesla Will Be Worth More Than Nvidia. Is It Time to Finally Buy the Stock?
        By Brett Schafer – May 10, 2025 at 2:50PM

        Key Points

        – CEO Elon Musk thinks Tesla can be the most valuable company in the world.

        – Its car business is struggling, and it is trying to pivot to artificial intelligence (AI) and humanoid robots.

        – Investors would be smart to avoid buying Tesla stock right now.

        Elon Musk likes to make bold claims. Some of these claims come true, but many do not. Recently, he has stated that he believes Tesla (TSLA 4.66%) can be the most valuable company in the world someday, claiming that it could be worth more than the next five companies combined in market capitalization. Today, these stocks such as Nvidia are worth more than $10 trillion in combined market capitalization.

        https://www.fool.com/investing/2025/05/10/elon-musk-thinks-tesla-will-be-worth-more-than-nvi/

    3. Finance·Tesla
      In a first, a pension fund has voted to block new investments in Tesla: ‘Musk has destroyed the brand’
      BY Amanda Gerut
      May 9, 2025 at 5:07 AM EDT

      – A U.S. pension fund has taken measures to pause new buying in Tesla stock because of the risks posed by the carmaker’s CEO Elon Musk and the lagging financial performance at the company. Lehigh County Controller Mark Pinsley said the fiduciary oversight duties of the pension board required them to clearly understand the risks of further investing retirees’ assets in the Tesla without more information.

      Pennsylvania’s Lehigh County Pension Board, which oversees retirement assets valued at about $593 million, voted this week to immediately stop new investments in Tesla in the county’s actively managed investment funds.

      https://fortune.com/2025/05/09/pension-fund-tesla-lehigh-elon-musk/

    4. Tesla short sellers make $16 billion as Elon Musk loses $200 billion
      Source Cryptopolitan
      Mar 18, 2025 04:40

      Hedge funds betting against Tesla have pocketed $16.2 billion in just three months as the electric car company’s stock has collapsed by half.

      Elon Musk, who was once worth over $320 billion, has seen his fortune plunge by $200 billion, setting a new world record for the largest personal wealth loss in history.

      https://www.mitrade.com/insights/news/live-news/article-3-703765-20250318

      1. “Elon Musk, who was once worth over $320 billion, has seen his fortune plunge by $200 billion,…”

        If this news brings tears of sadness to your eyes, consider that these are nominal dollar losses during a period when the dollar was CR8Ring. So Musk’s record personal losses are even bigger in real terms.

        It’s vey sad…

    5. 7 Stocks Burn A $2.5 Trillion Hole In Portfolios — Including Yours
      MATT KRANTZ
      Updated 08:00 AM ET 05/09/2025

      Last year, S&P 500 investors wanted to make as much money as they could — hence the popularity of the Magnificent Seven. Now, they’re just trying to avoid blowups.

      Unfortunately, sidestepping portfolio potholes is getting tougher. Just seven widely held stocks in the S&P 500 — including Apple (AAPL), Alphabet (GOOGL) and Nvidia (NVDA) — have shredded $2.5 trillion in market wealth this year, says an Investor’s Business Daily analysis of data from S&P Global Market Intelligence and MarketSurge.

      Ironically, many of the biggest losers now are also in the Mag 7, including Tesla (TSLA) and Amazon.com (AMZN). Blame the mayhem sparked by President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

      “Amid tariff concerns and economic uncertainty, investors have gravitated to defensive sectors in 2025, (which have) driven outperformance over cyclical stocks,” said Jeremiah Buckley, portfolio manager at Janus Henderson Investors.

      https://www.investors.com/etfs-and-funds/sectors/sp500-stocks-burn-a-trillion-hole-in-portfolios-including-yours/

  20. Do you expect an individual Bitcoin will soon top $1 million in value?

    I have bad news for you:

    – Bitcoin is a Ponzi asset in a massive risk asset bubble at a point when investors are becoming more precautious.

    – Like all bubbles before it, the Bitcoin bubble is destined to pop.

    – Many who bought into it will end up poorer and angrier as a result.

    1. Cathie Wood, the ‘believer’ who predicted $1.5M per bitcoin, has lost billions
      11:26 AM • Apr 23, 2025
      Ark Invest, Bitcoin, Cathie Wood, ETF
      by Protos Staff

      It’s been a rough few years for Cathie Wood. Once a thought leader and Bitcoin visionary who reached dizzying heights via her ARK Invest funds, she’s now tallying losses that reach well into 11 figures.

      On May 27, 2021, Wood was at her peak of fame. Her starry-eyed projections of futuristic AI, healthcare, crypto, and automation technologies earned her a spot on the cover of Bloomberg’s Businessweek magazine.

      According to the editors of the double issue with a print circulation of 325,000, she was the “The Believer” who was selling “a future so fantastic you’ll beg her to take your money.”

      However, since 2021, when she predicted that bitcoin (BTC) would rally to $1 million within nine years, shares of Wood’s flagship ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) have lost 59% of their value.

      As she lost money, she raised her BTC forecast to $1.5 million, but her BTC investments failed to stem the declining tide.

      https://protos.com/cathie-wood-the-believer-who-predicted-1-5m-per-bitcoin-has-lost-billions/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *