skip to Main Content
thehousingbubble@gmail.com

We Are Building Houses As Financial Assets

A weekend topic starting with WATE. “While home prices have risen this year, the East Tennessee Realtors Association said the housing market is going in a good direction, with more homes coming on the market. Maria McHale, government affairs and policy director for the East Tennessee Realtors said that while there are a number of homes to choose from, they are still out of reach for many people. East Tennessee’s average median home sale price is currently around $375,000, and Knox County’s is over $400,000. ‘For reference, in 2020 in April, we were looking at about $216,000, so you can see how steep that is,’ said McHale. She added that housing inventory is the largest factor in bringing down sale prices.”

The Idaho Press. “Senators, representatives and experts met at the Capitol on Wednesday to discuss the state of Idaho’s housing. Max Pond, head of government affairs for the Idaho Association of Realtors, spoke to the committee about Idaho’s housing inventory. The cost for an average starter home, defined as being in the 25th percentile of housing costs, was $420,000 in 2024. To afford a starter home, a household would need an income of over $100,000. ‘Many families’ wages have not grown at the same rate as housing in Idaho,’ Pond said. Star Mayor Trevor Chadwick has taken the ongoing challenge of accommodating new housing while meeting the needs of current residents. Chadwick said the cost of land has skyrocketed. According to him, land that used to cost between $25,000 and $50,000 per acre now costs $350,000 per acre.”

WVIR in Virginia. “If you have been more frustrated than usual by Charlottesville traffic, you are probably not alone. As the cost of housing in the Charlottesville-Albemarle area raises and fewer homes go on the market, more people have moved to surrounding Fluvanna and Greene Counties, according to the Charlottesville Area Association of Realtors, or CAAR. ‘People have this drive-to-save or drive-til-you-buy idea and so that’s exactly what happens,’ CAAR President Josh White said. ‘You know, you get pushed out of the city center to more of the rural markets or the markets where the prices haven’t quite escalated as high.'”

From Reuters. “Single-family housing starts, which account for the bulk of homebuilding, dropped 2.1% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 927,000 units last month, the Commerce Department’s Census Bureau said on Friday. A National Association of Home Builders survey on Thursday showed sentiment among single-family homebuilders plunged to a 1-1/2-year low in May, with 78% of builders reporting ‘difficulties pricing their homes recently due to uncertainty around material prices.’ There is also a glut of unsold new homes, with inventory at levels last seen in late 2007.”

From KHON. “Buying and renting homes in Hawaii continues to be a challenge for most residents, according to the latest Housing Factbook released by the University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization (UHERO). While condominium prices have dipped slightly, experts warn that the overall outlook remains troubling. ‘The pullback of insurers unwilling to provide insurance to condos means a lot of people can’t qualify for a mortgage, which has zapped some demand and is partially why prices have gone down,’ said UHERO economist Justin Tyndall.”

From Fox 13. “As Florida’s homeowners dispute insurance denials from last year’s hurricanes, state reforms intended to improve service and bring down our bills are coming under scrutiny. However, homeowners reported their premiums continued to rise through 2023. For example, in Pinellas County, Dave Lesko’s home insurance bill increased from $5,500 to $7,500 in 2023, after he had renovated and bolstered it with stronger windows. Then in 2024, his bill rose to $17,000. ‘I thought so at first I read the number wrong. I had to get my glasses and double-check, but it’s correct and it’s actually a 120% increase from last year,’ Lesko said.”

Fox 7 Austin. “If you’re looking to buy or sell a home in Central Texas, you’ll likely be navigating an unpredictable real estate market. When Liz Del Bosque put her northeast Austin home on the market back in March, she saw pretty strong interest, including packed open houses and a lot of showings. In the last few weeks, it’s been somewhat slower as more and more houses have gone up for sale in the Austin area. Del Bosque’s realtor Olivia Vale with Roots Residential Group says that’s not exactly the picture most experts had anticipated. ‘It’s a pretty competitive time that way because smaller pool of buyers, there is quite a lot of inventory for them to choose from right now,’ said Vale. While the market is a little sticky for sellers, there are some things you can do to overcome it, says Vale. ‘You can either… Have your sale be a smashing success by doing everything your realtor says, by prepping your home immaculately and just having it so ready to go that you’ll attract those buyers. If not, it’s gonna be really hard for you to stand out,’ said Vale.”

KEYT in California. “That college degree earned a few years ago and the thought of making around $100,000 a year someday soon may not be enough in Santa Barbara County. A new report says a single person making $98,850 in Santa Barbara County is still considered low income. In the Bay area – Marin, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz and San Francisco counties that figure is $100,000. A single person making six-figures could be above the median income of the area, but because of the lofty prices for housing, they fall into a low income range. Checking on several sites including Zillow, the average price of a home is around $1.8 million in Santa Barbara and about $650 thousand in Santa Maria.”

“Cristian Arambula said, ‘Yes. Two jobs and like five side quest and, some overtime. Yeah. Everyone’s kind of doing what they can. The side hustle is real. Yeah, absolutely. Uber, Lyft, DoorDash. You can do some production stuff. I work with livestock. I do massage now. I just came from a modeling gig.’ The economics of living in these times have many residents stretching out their working years. ‘I do, and I see more people who are retired who are not really retiring. They’re working past retirement. They’re getting both their benefits, and then they go out and get a side gig,’ said Jay McGrath in downtown.”

CTV News in Canada. “According to a new report, housing affordability in Fredericton, N.B. has worsened at a dramatic pace as the median home sale price jumped 85 per cent in five years. Aspiring homebuyers in the city, like Grace Colter, didn’t have to read the report to understand the issue. She’s been living it. The 25-year-old has moved back with her parents to save. ‘I feel like I should be in a different spot right now with my housing,’ she said. Lalith Kuragodage, 38, bought his house two years ago but not before paying $40,000 over-asking. He said his house, which was valued at $200,000 about three years ago, would now sell for about $340,000 and thinks housing prices in New Brunswick are now too high. ‘It’s not affordable actually,’ he said. From 2019 to 2024, the median home sale price in Fredericton jumped from $210,000 to nearly $388,000.”

Globe and Mail in Canada. “Unlike repeat homebuyers and investors, first-time homebuyers rely primarily on their incomes to fund both the down payment and monthly mortgage payments. As such, one of the most relevant indicators of affordability for them is the home price-to-disposable income ratio. The data reveal a stark divide in the Canadian housing market. On one side are most regions in Southern Ontario and British Columbia, where home prices significantly outpace incomes, pushing the ratio well above 8 – a threshold that signals unaffordability. At the extreme end of the spectrum is Vancouver, with a staggering price-to-income ratio of 14.4, making it not only the least affordable city in Canada but also the most unaffordable large metropolitan area in North America.”

The Canadian Dimension. “Housing costs are high because there are not enough homes. We must do everything in our power to add as many residences to the nation’s stockpile as quickly as possible. In the words of newly elected Prime Minister Mark Carney, the best solution to the housing crisis is to ‘build big, build bold and build now.’ Common sense says the core of this crisis is a basic supply and demand equation. But is common sense right? A 2025 CMHC report shows that Edmonton and Calgary have had similar vacancy rates for the last three years, but despite their comparable supply restrictions Calgary’s housing values rose by 17 percent while Edmonton’s rose by just five percent. Put another way, Calgary’s housing prices are rising three times faster than Edmonton’s—a difference that amounts to tens of thousands of dollars in the average homeowner’s property value. How can housing markets in similar cities be subject to virtually the same supply and demand pressures and have such divergent price fluctuations?”

“Some countries, like Portugal, have substantially more surplus housing than Canada but struggle with even higher housing costs. Other countries, like the Netherlands, have greater housing scarcity than we do, but have been able to keep their prices under Canadian averages. When the data is visualized there is no obvious correlation between relative housing abundance and average home prices. It is clear that supply and demand curves are not sufficient for understanding the housing crisis. We can build all we want, but if we are building houses as financial assets and not as places for people to live prices are going to stay high. We saw this in the 2010s when huge booms in the construction of luxury condos in San Francisco and London resulted in lots of empty penthouses but did nothing to address affordability.”

“By monomaniacally fixating on increasing supply we lose sight of the complexity of the issue. Our attempts to restore affordability under the banner ‘build big, build bold and build now’ (which has effectively been federal government policy since 2017) have only made things worse.”

Broker Daily in Australia. “The build-to-rent (BTR) initiative is set to allow for the development of large-scale, purpose-built rental housing units to be held in single ownership. In 2023, the Labor government allocated $60 million to support build-to-rent trials across the NSW South Coast and Northern Rivers regions. While this initiative has been welcomed by property industry professionals, Home Loan Experts senior mortgage broker Jonathan Preston is unconvinced of the scheme’s efficacy as a solution for affordability and supply, labelling BTR as ‘a joke.’ ‘I believe the solution is to allow for the construction of smaller apartments. ‘In Asia, units of 27-30sqm are standard for 1-bedrooms. They make 1000-2000 units per building,’ Preston said. ‘All of this ‘build-to-rent’ is a joke. We could solve housing affordability in a day if we just cut out the last 10 years of regulations: unlimited height ratios, no minimum sqm internals. Turn it into cage housing like Hong Kong. It’s the regulation that’s the issue.”

Radio New Zealand. “Twice this week, first-home buyers have been told that now might be their big chance to get into the housing market. But just how great an opportunity is it, really? Nationally, house prices are still down about 15 percent from the peak, although they are still up 4 percent a year compared to five years ago. Wellington’s prices are furthest from the peak, still down more than 25 percent, Auckland’s are down 21.6 percent. But all prices are still higher than five years ago. ‘Houses are more affordable than they were,’ Corelogic chief property economist Kelvin Davidson said. ‘I still wouldn’t say they are affordable as such – they’re cheaper, but not necessarily cheap. But are house prices really going to fall significantly further from here? It seems unlikely. They’ll probably turn around and rise a bit. There’s a sense now that they’re as cheap as they’re going to be even if they’re not necessarily cheap.'”

“But it’s actually a good time to be a renter, too. There is also a lot of rental stock on the market in lots of parts of the country, and advertised rents are dropping. The picture isn’t consistent across the entire country but it’s taking longer than normal to rent in most places with the exception of parts of Canterbury and Hawke’s Bay. ‘You could make a case of why rush into it when you could get a good deal on a rental for a while and you’re probably not going to get left behind by the housing market in the meantime,’ Davidson said. ‘In general terms renting is always cheaper than buying so nothing has really changed there… if you stuck to that line of argument no one would ever buy a house.'”

This Post Has 27 Comments
  1. ‘On one side are most regions in Southern Ontario and British Columbia, where home prices significantly outpace incomes, pushing the ratio well above 8 – a threshold that signals unaffordability. At the extreme end of the spectrum is Vancouver, with a staggering price-to-income ratio of 14.4’

    About 15 years ago I posted an article on the 10 most expensive shack areas in the US. It included the price to income ratios. You might think the most expensive would be the most desirable or where the people were more affluent. But no, it turned out the dollar cost of every level was higher where the price to income was higher.

    These ratios reveal decidedly subprime loans. Basically the more subprime you get the higher prices go. Which is probably why the globalist scum media rarely mention price to income. And of course since minor respiratory illness the situation has blown out to absurd levels.

    ‘East Tennessee’s average median home sale price is currently around $375,000, and Knox County’s is over $400,000. ‘For reference, in 2020 in April, we were looking at about $216,000’

    1. “since minor respiratory illness the situation has blown out to absurd levels”

      Phony virus, phony PCR tests, phony vaccines. It was all nothing more than a globalist lie.

      1. The elephant in the room is used to point out glaring problems right in front of us and there is no bigger elephant that what shanty prices did after the central bankers flooded the world with Jerry bucks. There was already a bubble in 2019:

        Pessimism seeping into Bay Area home market for 2020

        Originally Published: January 4, 2020

        Housing economists and real estate professionals are pessimistic about the Bay Area in 2020 — but don’t expect a crash to bring saner prices or slower sales.

        A survey of more than 100 economists and industry insiders by Zillow found that the majority think Bay Area median home values will rise more slowly than the national average. After years of soaring prices, gains of less than three percent could be the norm in 2020.

        “Pessimism is one way to put it,” said Zillow senior economist Cheryl Young, noting that local home prices have been flat or dropping for about 18 months. The nearly decade-long, record-breaking escalation in prices, she said, “really wasn’t sustainable any more.”

        The Bay Area saw hints of buyer fatigue in 2019, with falling sales and prices in core Silicon Valley counties. In 2020, the soft market could be influenced up or down by several forces, including low interest and unemployment rates and what’s likely to be a destabilizing presidential election, economists say.

        Housing market watchers are bearish on California because high prices have pushed home buying out of reach for many residents, Young said. But low-interest rates and strong employment in the Bay Area stokes demand, and Young sees little chance the market will drop dramatically.

        Frank Nothaft, chief economist at real estate data firm CoreLogic, said the national outlook is good — low-interest rates and unemployment numbers are fueling a strong U.S. economy. The U.S. has not had interest and unemployment rates both slip to current levels — below 4 percent — since World War II, he said.

        For the Bay Area, Nothaft also sees slower growth in home prices after years of record-setting sales. A significant slowing in home price growth is “good and important” to make homes affordable to buyers, he said. The San Jose, East Bay and San Francisco markets have seen housing costs far outpace wage growth in recent years.

        Steam has been leaking out of the Bay Area housing engine during the last 12 months. Year-over-year prices in the Bay Area grew about 8 percent in October 2018, while they dropped nearly one percent in October 2019, according to CoreLogic. “That’s a big swing,” Nothaft said.

        https://www.siliconvalley.com/2020/01/04/pessimism-seeping-into-bay-area-home-market-for-new-year/

        1. Tech Bubble 2.0 is bursting as start-ups and business models that were only viable in a world awash with FedBux funny money enter the dead pool as the Fed takes the punchbowl away. As borrowing costs rise & tech company valuations crash back to earth, Silicon Valley will be shedding headcount & outsourcing positions to India, etc.

          It would be a darn shame if Big Brother’s Little Helpers at the creepy Orwellian tech companies who were so zealous in censoring and banning truth-tellers from social media following the fraudulent installment of the senile Pedo & the scamdemic were to find themselves jobless & faced with covering staggering mortgages on shacks that are shedding thousands of Yellen Bux “value” each month.

  2. ‘You could make a case of why rush into it when you could get a good deal on a rental for a while and you’re probably not going to get left behind by the housing market in the meantime,’ Davidson said. ‘In general terms renting is always cheaper than buying so nothing has really changed there… if you stuck to that line of argument no one would ever buy a house’

    ‘renting is always cheaper than buying’

    Didn’t used to be Kelvin. For decades the rent to own ratio was remarkably stable, like shanty price themselves. And dollar for dollar paying a loan was lower than renting. In north Texas where I grew up a shanty cost about the same as Palo Alto California in the late 1960’s. But that’s not remarkable as the entire US was about the same.

  3. ‘A National Association of Home Builders survey on Thursday showed sentiment among single-family homebuilders plunged to a 1-1/2-year low in May, with 78% of builders reporting ‘difficulties pricing their homes recently due to uncertainty around material prices.’ There is also a glut of unsold new homes, with inventory at levels last seen in late 2007’

    Wa happened to my shortage shanty builders?

    1. Even before the sun’s first rays dispelled the early morning darkness here in Colorado Springs, realtors were preparing for the new day with the same old lies.

  4. “Have your sale be a smashing success by doing everything your realtor says, by prepping your home immaculately and just having it so ready to go that you’ll attract those buyers. If not, it’s gonna be really hard for you to stand out,’ said Vale.”

    First of all, “smashing success”? STFU!! Second, you won’t even need a realtor if you price it right.

  5. Years ago while doing an estimate I met Clarence Clemons in the dumpy @ss condo he lived in with the scraps he was paid after helping this “great tax dodging American”, the Loss or I’m sorry the Boss get rich.

    BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN goes off on TRUMP ADMINISTRATION live in MANCHESTER

    May 15, 2025

    https://youtu.be/z_6mnNyLERk?si=R0eM6b-fIuRQHtOV

    1. Springsteen, fake farmer
      Staff WriterBucks County Courier Times

      In a letter to the editor of his hometown New Jersey paper, Bruce Springsteen complained that state budget cutting is harming the poor and the lower middle class. As a regular guy residing on a 200-acre spread in Colts Neck, Monmouth County, he’s deeply concerned.

      The singer-songwriter cited a newspaper story that detailed the effects of Gov. Chris Christie’s austerity budget and the decreased funding to anti-poverty programs.

      Wrote Springsteen: “The article is one of the few that highlights the contradictions between a policy of large tax cuts, on the one hand, and cuts in services to those in the most dire conditions, on the other.

      “Finally, (the) article shows that the cuts are eating away at the lower edges of the middle class, not just those already classified as in poverty, and are likely to continue to get worse over the next few years. I’m always glad to see my hometown newspaper covering these issues.”

      He should set that to music.

      Meanwhile, another story worthy of letters to the editor is how Springsteen and lefty millionaires like him game New Jersey’s state property tax system to avoid paying millions of dollars in taxes, which starves the state treasury of cash.

      The story about “fake farmers” using the Farmland Assessment Act of 1964 to decrease their property taxes was laid out in the Asbury Park newspaper in December. In February, a TV news station in New York City revealed how Springsteen is among the fake farmers and pays a fraction of taxes on prime real estate in one of the most affluent neighborhoods in the Garden State.

      Fox 5 New York found that while Springsteen pays $138,000 in taxes on his house on three acres, the surrounding 200 acres of buffer, owned by Springsteen through a trust, paid just $4,638.67.

      That’s less tax than working stiffs in blue collar Willingboro pay on their quarter-acre estates along Levitt Parkway.

      Springsteen gets the tax break by having a farmer grow organic vegetables on part of the land, according to the news report.

      Who knew organic arugula could taste so sweet?

      Springsteen’s other working class neighbor, Jon Bon Jovi, has a similar deal, Fox 5 found.

      Bon Jovi pays $296,000 in taxes on his house and some of the land it’s on. But he pays a mere $104 on an additional seven surrounding acres. Bon Jovi pays someone to raise honeybees on his property, triggering the lower assessment.

      It must be swell to be Bruce Springsteen, living an idly rich life in horsey country, knocking around your mansion, strumming your guitar, pondering the poor.

      But where do economic geniuses like The Boss think New Jersey is going to get the money to pay for social programs? Honeybees?

      https://www.buckscountycouriertimes.com/story/opinion/columns/2011/04/19/springsteen-fake-farmer/17903062007/

      1. “The Boss” is a craven toadie for our globalist overlords. You will never, ever see a “Rich Men North of Richmond” style anti-Establishment protest song from this fraudulent self-described champion of the working class, who is about as genuine as Fauxahontus.

  6. “The build-to-rent (BTR) initiative is set to allow for the development of large-scale, purpose-built rental housing units to be held in single ownership.

    “You will own nothing, and be happy.” — Klaus Schwab, WEF

  7. But are house prices really going to fall significantly further from here? It seems unlikely.

    Remember, kids: every “expert” cited in the garbage legacy media is a shill for the REIC advertisers that the media’s continued existence depends on. If you want real news & real truth, you won’t find it in the globalist scum media.

  8. Clutch those pearls harder. Clutch ’em.

    Military commanders will be told to send transgender troops to medical checks to oust them (5/16/2025):

    “Gender dysphoria occurs when a person’s biological sex does not match up with their gender identity.”

    ^ This is a Judeo-Bolshevik lie.

    “Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth allege that troops with gender dysphoria don’t meet military standards. Hegseth has tied his opposition to a campaign to rid the department of “wokeness.”

    “No More Trans @ DoD,” Hegseth wrote in a post on X. In a recent speech to a special operations conference, he said: “No more dudes in dresses. We’re done with that s—.”

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/military-commanders-will-be-told-to-send-transgender-troops-to-medical-checks-to-oust-them/ar-AA1ERl4E?ocid=BingNewsVerp

    Dr. Richard Levine (his name is Richard) is a groomer pedophile.

    1. Trans troops are non-deployable due to the staggering levels of medical treatment they require, not to mention their mental health issues. Any military members who are permanently non-deployable should be booted immediately, since they are unfit for military service. Ditto for all the pregnant females.

    2. Since at least the Clinton Administration, the globalists & their Democrat-Bolshevik minions have sought to turn the U.S. military into a social engineering testbed, pushing Affirmative Action, DEI, and wokeness at the expense of warfighting capability and combat readiness. Despite the string of neocon “regime change” fiascos after 2001, which added trillions to the national debt and cost thousands of lives, Democrat-Bolshevik political commissars and dilettantes in uniform pushed the same disastrous “woke” policies. Now Pete Hegseth has declared a warrior ethos is making a comeback, which has caused recruitment of the southern and midwestern white males so reviled by the “woke” military to soar. The globalist scum media & Comrades of Proven Worth (D) are naturally clutching their pearls & hyperventilating, as can be expected.

      https://www.axios.com/2025/01/14/pete-hegseth-pentagon-confirmation-opening-statement

  9. U.S. Bancorp Tower in Portland, Oregon expected to sell for 27% of 2015 price or less.

    “Could sell for less than $100M.” Purchased for $372M in 2015.

    Largest tenant, U.S. Bank, is leaving which would drop its occupancy rate to 24%.

    When will the wipeout of Yellen Bux “value” from CRE portfolios start taking down banks & pension funds?

    https://x.com/FCNightingale/status/1923791118149304608

  10. Too late, the globalist scum media is being called out for being complicit in the cover-up of Biden’s mental unfitness to be president. When will they also be called out for their complicity in the 2020 election steal and for pushing the scamdemic era clot shots and lockdowns that did enormous damage to public health and the productive economy?

    https://nypost.com/2025/05/17/business/wall-street-saw-right-through-medias-coverup-of-bidens-decline/

  11. If ‘Murican debt donkeys can’t afford to make their car payments, how can they afford to sign on Mr. Banker’s Line Which is Dotted for insanely overpriced shacks?

    US auto loan serious delinquencies are rising at an alarming pace:

    The share of auto loan balances at least 90 days past due hit 5.0% in Q1 2025, the most since the 2020 peak.

    This is also slightly below the post-2008 peak of 5.2%.

    Transitions into a delinquency of 30+ days reached 8.0% in Q1 2025, the highest in 15 years.

    Serious delinquencies continue to surge elevated interest rates pressure consumers.

    All while total US auto debt sits near a record $1.64 TRILLION.

    US consumers are struggling.

    https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1923841453358207435

  12. After the end of WWII, American Ivy League Universities were captured by globalist termites in the foundations who turned once-great learning institutions into centers for subversion and anti-American agitation, involuntarily funded by taxpayers. Now these radical leftists will have to lean into their globalist oligarch patrons to stay afloat as they face a cut-off of the FedGov gravy train. Seethe harder, commie academics!

    Financial Reckoning Hits Universities: Pay Cuts, Layoffs and No Coffee

    A financial reckoning has started at universities from the Ivy League to state schools as President Trump’s funding cuts hit home.

    Spending pullbacks such as hiring freezes, research pauses, broad budget cuts and in some cases layoffs have begun at universities including Harvard, Columbia, Princeton and Michigan State. The cutbacks extend across school budgets, beyond areas directly affected by research funds that Trump has canceled.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/financial-reckoning-hits-universities-pay-cuts-layoffs-and-no-coffee/ar-AA1EUmen

  13. GOLDSTEIN: ‘Elbows up’ was Liberal rhetoric while policy was ‘quietly fold’ on tariffs

    As it turns out, Prime Minister Mark Carney’s election strategy of publicly talking tough about taking on U.S. President Donald Trump in his tariff/trade war, while practising a far more conciliatory approach behind the scenes, was hiding in plain sight all the time.

    Ian Bremmer, president of New York-based Eurasia Group, a political risk analysis firm with close ties to Carney, accurately predicted this strategy in a March 26 column titled, “The end of the transatlantic relationship as we know it.”

    Unlike Mexico, which took a more conciliatory approach, he wrote, “Canadian leaders have a political incentive to put up a bigger fight because Trump’s threats toward Canada’s economy and sovereignty have sharply inflamed nationalist sentiment north of the border in the run-up to the April 28 elections. However, I expect Ottawa will quietly fold shortly after the vote to ensure that ongoing relations with the U.S. remain functional.”

    This now appears to have been the Liberals’ successful election strategy all along.

    Carney initially said “dollar-for-dollar retaliatory tariffs by Canada” against the U.S. “should be a given” during the Liberal leadership race – “elbows up” as the popular saying went.

    But after becoming prime minister, Carney said this was unrealistic given that the Canadian economy is “a tenth the size of the U.S.”

    According to a Bloomberg News report in the National Post last week, on May 7 – the day after Carney’s cordial meeting with Trump in the White House and nine days after Carney won the election – “Canada … effectively suspended almost all of its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. products,” having “announced a six-month tariff exemption for products used in Canadian manufacturing, processing and food and beverage packaging, and for items related to health care, public safety and national security.

    “Automakers got a break, too: companies that manufacture in Canada, such as General Motors Co., are allowed to import some vehicles into Canada tariff free.”

    (The finance department announced these moves in a little-noticed April 15 news release becoming effective, as my Postmedia colleague Brian Lilley reported, when they were published in the Canada Gazette on May 7.)

    Tony Stillo, of Oxford Economics, told Bloomberg that based on his firm’s calculations, Canada’s tariff-rate increase on the U.S. is now “nearly zero,” adding, “It’s a very strategic approach from a new prime minister to really say, ‘We’re not going to have a retaliation.’”

    That’s very different from Carney’s messaging during the campaign.

    Was Bremmer able to predict the Liberals’ strategy in advance because of the close ties between Carney and Eurasia Group?

    Gerald Butts, former principal secretary to prime minister Justin Trudeau and an adviser to the Carney campaign, is vice-chairman of the Eurasia Group.

    Evan Solomon, the newly-elected Liberal MP for Toronto Centre, is a longtime friend of Carney, who appointed him as Canada’s first minister of artificial intelligence last week. Prior to that, Solomon was publisher of GZERO Media, a Eurasia Group subsidiary.

    Carney’s spouse, Diana Fox Carney, joined Eurasia Group in 2021 as a senior advisor on climate and energy policy.

    Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner noted these connections in a March 27 substack column where she asked, “Why is a firm closely related with Mark Carney and the Liberals telling the world to expect that Canada will acquiesce to American demands after the election … did Bremmer arrive at his conclusion Canada would ‘have to accept Trump’s terms eventually’ and ‘Ottawa would quietly fold shortly after the vote’ from discussions with any of these people? Should it be taken as the Liberals’ post election plan for tariffs should they form government … it’s a question worth asking.”

    “That’s because … it’s not a stretch to imagine that after tricking the Canadian electorate into giving them a fourth term, the Liberals would, in fact, simply capitulate to Trump’s demands,” Rempel Garner said while noting, “Trump’s recent comment that he’d prefer the Liberals to win because it would be better for him.”

    There’s nothing surprising about the Liberals pursuing one strategy in public and a different one in private for political gain. And while the economic threat posed by Trump’s tariffs hasn’t gone away, he appears, for now, to be backing off the most severe sanctions aimed at Canada.

    That said, Carney’s “elbows up” rhetoric during the campaign appears to have been done mainly for show.

    https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/goldstein-elbows-up-was-liberal-rhetoric-while-policy-was-quietly-fold-on-tariffs

  14. Push to bring clothes manufacturing back to Australia ramps up due to trade war

    During Australian Fashion Week last week, models walked the runway clothed by home-grown designers, but while the designs were local, the outfits themselves were made overseas.

    Determined to future-proof the industry from rising costs and tariff uncertainty, the Australian Fashion Council is embarking on a bold plan to bring the textile industry home.

    In the 1950s, Australia’s ‘rag trade’ was booming. Surry Hills in Sydney and Flinders Lane in Melbourne were bursting with garment manufacturing factories and workshops.

    But as worker shortages and rising electricity costs combined with cheaper labour overseas, much of it moved offshore.

    The fashion council, which represents the industry, now estimates 97 per cent of Australia’s $28 billion of fashion is produced overseas.

    “Our sector is at a critical tipping point,” chief executive Jaana Quaintance-James said. “We’ve identified an urgent need for a national manufacturing strategy — one that safeguards jobs, restores technical capability, and strengthens our global competitiveness.”

    Partnering with RM Williams, which has been manufacturing clothing and shoes in Adelaide since 1932, the council will hold six industry consultation sessions, with the full detail of the strategy to be delivered in late 2025.

    Ms Quaintance-James said the plan would also help job creation. “You’re supporting the payment of local taxes, and a broader kind of economic and social development in Australia,” she said.

    Ms Quaintance-James said while China was the engine room of global textile production, the US was a growing market for Australian fashion houses.

    With most of the cotton and wool produced in Australia being processed in China, Australia’s fashion industry has become collateral as a key customer goes to war with the industry’s main supplier.

    Most synthetic fibres such as polyester or nylon are made from petrochemicals, and it is estimated 70 per cent of the global supply is manufactured in China.

    Natural fibres can be sourced from plants, such as cotton, or animals, such as sheep.

    The raw product needs to be processed, which includes cleaning, spinning and weaving, and like garment manufacturing, it is almost all done offshore.

    Australia is a leading producer of cotton and wool, though both industries have struggled in recent years; the cotton industry faced a trade ban from China in 2020 while Australian wool production this year fell to a 100-year low.

    If Australia is to turn back the clock textile manufacturing, Ms Quaintance-James said the national strategy would require a co-ordinated effort from government and the private sector.

    “Tariffs are just the latest example. In COVID, we were unable to produce our own healthcare uniforms,” she said. “And we’re in exactly the same situation. We have not evolved from that. So when are we going to learn this lesson?”

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-18/trade-wars-prompt-australian-fashion-manufacturing-push/105299640

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *