skip to Main Content
thehousingbubble@gmail.com

Some People Were Spending A Million Dollars Over Asking, People Just Wanted In

A report from the Palm Beach Post in Florida. “Anticipating a refinancing offer that could save him $647 a month, Dave Mayers of Jupiter instead got a jolt of reality: The deal was nixed after lenders saw the level of insurance his condominium association was carrying. Inadequate insurance is the most oft-cited reason that more condominium associations are on federal mortgage guarantor Fannie Mae’s blacklist, a number that’s more than tripled over the past two years. ‘I’ve never been rejected for a loan in my life,’ said the 74-year-old retired Pennsylvania furniture store owner. ‘I was really counting on the savings I was going to receive from a refinance to help with all the added expenses of the increased reserves. If condos in Florida can’t acquire mortgages or refinancing because of Fannie (Mae’s) … new mandates and pile that on top of the (structural integrity reserve study) mandates, what happens to seniors, like myself, and to the property values in Florida? This is just crazy.'”

“Only two or three companies would insure garden-style, low-rise condos and coverage for high-rises were simply unaffordable compared to years past, according to Tyler Spaedt, vice president at Valley Insurance Services, which specializes in condo communities. He says about one of the 10 of associations he’s covering can’t manage to buy the insurance that would pay for the full replacement value of a condo association’s common property. Michael J. Gelfand, a West Palm Beach attorney who specializes in condo association law, said he urges associations to get the full replacement value if they can. ‘Insuring a roof for its actual cash value doesn’t work,’ Gelfand said. ‘When it’s depreciated, it’s pennies on the dollar for the cost of replacement.'”

The Houston Chronicle in Texas. “Linda and Greg Stickline’s Galveston home is a vision of Victorian charm. Before the couple moved into the home in 2012, they spent two years and hundreds of thousands of dollars restoring the 100-year-old property, adding a modern kitchen and breezy backyard living space. But despite the home’s historic touches and its desirable location, the Sticklines haven’t been able to sell their six-bedroom home after more than 120 days on the market. And they’re not alone. ‘We didn’t expect this,’ said Linda Stickline, who has bought and sold multiple homes in the Houston area and Galveston over the years, always managing to sell quickly. Even after successful open houses, the Sticklines still haven’t received an offer. ‘This isn’t how it usually goes for us, so I think it’s a tough one.'”

“Although the $1.05 million asking price puts the home in the luxury range, the Sticklines’ broker, Tom Schwenk, said, ‘I don’t think that the price is what’s really stopping anyone anyway.’ ‘Nobody’s really even looking,’ Linda Stickline added. The number of homes for sale on Galveston Island has surged 42% in the past year – hitting about 1,000 listings in the first quarter, according to HAR. Much of the supply stems from investors who purchased during the height of the pandemic. The glut of homes for sale comes at a time of elevated mortgage rates and economic uncertainty, which have sidelined many buyers. Galveston now has nearly 17 months of housing supply.”

“‘A house that would have sold pre-COVID for $300,000 was selling for $600,000 or $750,000,’ at the height of the pandemic, said Diane Moore, president of the Galveston Association of Realtors. Back then, broker Louis Salas said, he was fielding up to six calls a week from prospective short-term rental investors. Many were banking on unrealistic revenue projections from vacation rental platforms, said Salas of Re/Max Leading Edge. ‘Some of them were being represented by Realtors who weren’t really familiar with the island,’ said Salas. ‘They didn’t look at comps or the actual numbers. They were just excited.’ And most Galveston owners need to carry three different types of insurance: home, flood and windstorm. Inflation and updated FEMA rules around flood risks are pushing up those costs as well. ‘People (who were) paying $400 for flood insurance are now paying triple,’ said Alex Monteith with Galveston-based Insurance Junction.”

From Realtor.com. “From 2019 to 2024, more than 100,000 California homeowners lost coverage, according to research from the Public Policy Institute of California. For Claire O’Connor, a Los Angeles real estate agent and homeowner, the devastation became deeply personal. ‘I literally said to my husband when we got dropped [in November 2024],’ she recalled in an interview with Realtor.com®. ‘As if our house is going to burn down … so many houses would have to burn to get to our house…’ We were so far from the hills.’ Then, just two months later, the unthinkable happened. O’Connor lost her home in the Palisades fire, one of more than 4,700 homes partly or entirely destroyed.”

“‘The insurance process has been horrible,’ she says. ‘You get a check, and then you have to co-sign it with your bank if you have a mortgage, and it goes into an escrow account.’ Rather than providing immediate relief, many insurance payouts are tangled in red tape. Insurance hurdles remain steep even for those looking to relocate within the region. ‘We have a client … he said he pays $3,000 a year in Arizona, and he got a quote [in Los Feliz] for $40,000 to $50,000.'”

National Public Radio. “More than 70 properties — home to hundreds of renters — are caught up in a massive mortgage fraud battle. But people living at the largest of those properties could get help soon. The properties were owned by Vision & Beyond until the company abandoned them late last year. One of the company’s founders, Stas Grinberg, currently is in Butler County Jail on federal fraud charges. The whereabouts of co-founder Peter Gizuntermann are unknown. Both founders are parties in a series of foreclosure claims, fraud lawsuits, and other legal problems.”

“Meanwhile, the question of who ultimately owns the buildings continues. Legal representatives for lenders allege Vision & Beyond’s founders took out mortgages on the properties, even though the investors Vision & Beyond attracted actually owned them. ‘This case is about who is going to be left holding the bag,’ said J.P. Burleigh, an attorney for one group of investors. ‘Between the investors and the lenders, not everyone is going to win.'”

From CTV News in Canada. “For a while, Jordan Baechler thought he was doing everything right. At 26, he bought his first home; a one-bedroom condo in Toronto’s King West neighbourhood for about $600,000. A high school teacher and coach, he says he was determined to build equity and eventually move into a house before turning 30. But that dream began to unravel only months later. ‘I bought with a variable rate mortgage and my financial life was turned upside down by the year 2022,’ said Baechler. ‘I waited too long to lock in… I was advised the variable rate has long been more competitive than a fixed rate.'”

“Instead, interest rates surged. After the pandemic, the central bank raised interest rates to five per cent for 11 months. Baechler‘s monthly mortgage costs soared as a result going up by approximately $500 a month and prompting him to lock in with a fixed rate due to fear. ‘We are planning on getting married and having kids, but want to buy a house first. The issue we feel is that we would have to take a significant loss on our condo to sell it, but of course can’t buy a new house without selling the condo,’ Baechler said. Baechler is just one of thousands of Ontarians struggling to keep up with mortgage payments as debt levels rise.”

“Justin Herlick, co-founder of Pine, a Canadian mortgage lender and brokerage, says his firm is seeing more borrowers ask for re-amortizations; an effort to stretch mortgages from 20 or 25 to 30 years so they can lower monthly payments. It’s a tactic that buys time but also increases long-term debt, he warned. ‘It kind of puts them on this hamster wheel,’ he said. ‘They don’t have to sell the home at a loss but they’re just paying more interest.'”

“Mya Elango, a newcomer to Canada, moved her family to Mississauga in 2018. After years of saving, they bought a three-bedroom home in Kitchener-Waterloo for about $900,000. But she says they were pressured to bid far above asking and enter the market during a peak and competitive period. ‘Due to misguidance we bought a property for $100,000 more than asking price in a high interest rate. Then the struggle started,’ she said. Their monthly mortgage now tops $4,000, not including insurance or other costs. ‘Most of our income is going to pay the interest,’ she said. ‘We were not lucky enough to buy at lower interest rates.'”

“James Milonas, a Toronto-based real estate agent says, at the time, many buyers were desperate to get into the market at any cost. ‘Some people were spending a million dollars over asking,’ he said. ‘There was no inventory… people just wanted in.’ Milonas adds that homeowners who feel ‘trapped’should try to wait it out if they can. ‘If you can, hold tight until the market corrects itself,’ he said.”

This Post Has 42 Comments
  1. ‘Only two or three companies would insure garden-style, low-rise condos and coverage for high-rises were simply unaffordable compared to years past, according to Tyler Spaedt, vice president at Valley Insurance Services, which specializes in condo communities. He says about one of the 10 of associations he’s covering can’t manage to buy the insurance that would pay for the full replacement value of a condo association’s common property. Michael J. Gelfand, a West Palm Beach attorney who specializes in condo association law, said he urges associations to get the full replacement value if they can. ‘Insuring a roof for its actual cash value doesn’t work,’ Gelfand said. ‘When it’s depreciated, it’s pennies on the dollar for the cost of replacement’

    This is a detailed article on the whole commie living insurance mess. I was talking with an insurance adjuster for a big firm. He told me if a roof is a certain age, it doesn’t matter if you have a replacement policy. They’ll just say ‘nope, it says here in page 25 we don’t cover it.’

    1. But wouldn’t it make sense that insurance factor in depreciation? If a roof is 25 years old and it gets blown off, then I can understand insurance not paying out for a brand-new roof. Because you already got 25 free years out of the roof.

      1. It makes sense and it’s all in writing. But you are paying for insurance and then it doesn’t pay out. If yer roof is newer, they will pay. But you don’t need a roof when it’s newer. It’s almost like the whole thing is a scam.

        1. But you don’t need a roof when it’s newer

          A good hail storm can trash a new roof. But that is rare.

    2. “He says about one of the 10 of associations he’s covering can’t manage to buy the insurance that would pay for the full replacement value of a condo association’s common property.”

      Property insurance along the Gulf coast from Texas to Florida and the entire Atlantic coast has never been cheap given the energy laden moist air typical of the region.

  2. ‘A house that would have sold pre-COVID for $300,000 was selling for $600,000 or $750,000,’ at the height of the pandemic’

    You really screwed up this time Jerry.

  3. ‘I was really counting on the savings I was going to receive from a refinance to help with all the added expenses of the increased reserves.

    “I was told I could always refinance once interest rates dropped.” — Every duped FB.

  4. Even after successful open houses, the Sticklines still haven’t received an offer. ‘This isn’t how it usually goes for us, so I think it’s a tough one.’”

    Au contraire, Linda. Adhere to the proven two-step Francis Soyer formula for shack sellers, & yer alligator will be gone in no time:

    1. Abandon yer delusional wish price
    2. Price your house to sell in the current market

  5. ‘I don’t think that the price is what’s really stopping anyone anyway.’ ‘Nobody’s really even looking,’ Linda Stickline added.

    Oh really Linda? And why aren’t they looking? Price!! Cut the price in half and they’ll be plenty of people looking. What an idiot.

  6. ‘Nobody’s really even looking,’ Linda Stickline added.

    Oh dear. That could be problematic for Always Be Closing.

      1. It is, the water is usually silt colored. The beaches aren’t great. And it is flat. Which means a hurricane could make the whole place go away in a few hours. I posted an article from the local paper a while back:

        March 26, 2025

        The Daily News in Texas. “An internet news organization last week ran a story about Galveston. The headline was: ‘A coastal city where every house is for sale.’ That story sprang from — and dramatically distorted — news reporting in this newspaper. The notion that every house on the island is for sale is hyperbole, of course. But the oversupply of houses on the market is real. Galveston’s housing glut rises from a one-time surge in investments in short-term rental properties that came out of the five years since 2020 — in other words, the period of the Covid-19 pandemic. It was a classic example of irrational exuberance. Short-term rental registrations in Galveston spiked, rising from 2,300 in 2021 to a peak of about 4,900 in 2023.”

        “These days, many of those pandemic-era investors are dining on a large dish of reality. The hopes for easy wealth were elusive. Managing rental property is a real, full-time job. Today, many owners are selling, and that has created the glut — something like an 18-month supply of homes for sale versus a normal market of roughly six months. The oversupply in the 77554 ZIP code, the island’s West End, is about 20 months. The current instability in the housing market proves a painful adage: If an investment opportunity sounds just too good to be true, it probably is.”

        http://housingbubble.blog/?p=9078

        1. And it is flat. Which means a hurricane could make the whole place go away in a few hours.

          I’ll bet an insurance policy costs a king’s ransom, assuming an insurer can be found.

  7. The number of homes for sale on Galveston Island has surged 42% in the past year – hitting about 1,000 listings in the first quarter, according to HAR.

    B…b…but muh pent-up demand! Spring Miracle Revival! Buyers waiting impatiently on the sidelines for any inventory to appear! Call it a hunch, call it an intuition, but I’m starting to think that realtors are liars.

  8. ‘This case is about who is going to be left holding the bag,’ said J.P. Burleigh, an attorney for one group of investors. ‘Between the investors and the lenders, not everyone is going to win.’”

    I loves me a good “Housing speculator scum getting fleeced by con men while Fauxahontus turns a blind eye” story first thing in the morning. Thanks, Ben!

  9. But she says they were pressured to bid far above asking and enter the market during a peak and competitive period. ‘Due to misguidance we bought a property for $100,000 more than asking price in a high interest rate.

    So we’ve officially reached the phase of the bursting housing bubble where the reckless, greedy FOMO lemmings who bought at the peak of the market wail in unison that they were “pressured” into such poor decisions. They are victims, not degenerate gamblers. I see it so clearly now….

  10. WSJ Opinion – Welfare As We Know It Is Back—and It’s Bipartisan.

    It’s the Clinton years in reverse: Democrats and some Republicans refuse to reform Medicaid.

    https://archive.ph/wWV0d

    Bill Clinton won election in 1992 on a promise to “end welfare as we know it.” When running for re-election four years later, he declared “the era of big government is over.” Alas, welfare is back in fashion like girls’ overalls, ushering in a new era of bipartisan big government.

    Blue Dog Democrats who backed welfare and other government reforms in the 1990s are a dying breed. Many were defeated in 2010 after they voted for ObamaCare. Now Republicans who took their place in Congress are shrinking from modest reforms that scale back ObamaCare’s vast Medicaid expansion. Bring back the 1990s, please.

    When Medicaid was established in 1965, it was intended to provide healthcare for the truly indigent, sick and disabled. But ObamaCare dangled extra federal funds for states that extended eligibility to able-bodied working-age adults, including college students, which created a large new class of welfare beneficiaries.

    Nearly half of New York City residents are on Medicaid. As are 40% of Californians. Since the ObamaCare expansion took effect in 2014, Medicaid enrollment has swelled. Meantime, states are gaming the program’s rules to wring more money out of Washington.

    California imposes a tax on insurers to obtain more federal matching funds, which allows it to extend coverage to millions of undocumented immigrants. The Golden State expects to receive some $120 billion in Medicaid matching funds this year, more than Florida’s entire state budget.

    During the 1990s, both parties sought to crack down on such schemes. In 1991, George H.W. Bush signed a bipartisan law to prevent states from using taxes on healthcare providers to milk more federal matching funds, some of which they then kicked back to those same healthcare providers. Even Reps. Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer voted for it.

    California, New York and other states then devised ways to circumvent the law’s limitations. Many Republican-led states have joined the Medicaid racket—why give up a free lunch that others are taking? But someone has to pay, and it will be future taxpayers.

    Many Republicans in Congress who campaigned against ObamaCare—here’s looking at you, Josh Hawley—are refusing to close Medicaid’s all-you-can-eat buffett. Some are spooked by Democratic claims that any changes to the program, however modest, will throw poor people to the wolves.

    The 1996 welfare reforms are instructive. Cash welfare had previously operated similarly to Medicaid. States received federal matching funds, which encouraged them to spend more on welfare and expand eligibility. That system also discouraged work and marriage.

    A large bipartisan majority in Congress thus transformed the program into a block grant with work requirements and time limits on benefits. States received flexibility to spend money on programs to increase employment and reduce out-of-wedlock births. The left’s catastrophic predictions about soaring childhood poverty proved wrong.

    Employment among single mothers soared, causing childhood poverty to fall. Between 1995 and 2000, employment rates among single mothers rose to 66% from 46%. Childhood poverty rates fell to 11.3% from 13.8%. Shrinking the welfare state turned out to benefit individuals and society writ large as births to single mothers leveled off and declined for teens.

    In the 1990s, both parties recognized that federal programs to help the needy could be abused. Another illustration is the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, which initially gave schools more federal money for each disabled student. The goal was to encourage states to pro-actively identify kids with special needs.
    It achieved that goal, but it also created a perverse incentive for schools to diagnose healthy kids as disabled to rake in more federal funds. By a near-unanimous vote, Congress in 1997 changed the federal funding formula to prevent states from milking Washington.

    But my, have times changed. Democrats these days would claim such a reform throws kids with special needs under the school bus. And Republicans would run for the hills, as they are doing on Medicaid reform. While Republicans have become more pugnacious in the cultural wars, they have also become more pusillanimous when it comes to welfare.

    Some worry that any changes to Medicaid will harm working-class Americans. They think their stillborn 2017 effort to repeal and replace ObamaCare cost them the House in 2018. Not so. Most working-class Americans don’t want to become government dependents, and their revolt against ObamaCare fueled GOP gains in Congress last decade.

    The GOP’s drubbing in 2018 flowed from Democrats’ energy in opposing Donald Trump. As the 1990s welfare reforms suggest, shrinking Medicaid can be a political winner if Republicans make a moral case for it. That means explaining how ObamaCare perversely encourages states to spend more on able-bodied adults than the disabled and discourages work.

    If Republicans can’t or won’t make this argument and surrender the battlefield to Democrats, they deserve to lose.

    1. Could somebody explain this part?
      —-
      California imposes a tax on insurers to obtain more federal matching funds, which allows it to extend coverage to millions of undocumented immigrants.
      …In 1991, George H.W. Bush signed a bipartisan law to prevent states from using taxes on healthcare providers to milk more federal matching funds,
      —-

      So is California doing something illegal, or did they find some other way to skirt around these laws?

      Is there anyone in FedGov actually watching this money once it gets to the states, or are they simply entrusting the states to do the right thing? Given what we saw during COVID,* my guess is no. This sounds like a job for DOGE and AI. It shouldn’t be hard to cross-reference payments through that patient’s SS number.

      ———–
      *State Medicaid got bonus money for Covid. As Covid ramped down, instead of giving the money back, states used the Covid bonus money for non-Covid Medicaid payments. Of course they squawked when the money was finally stopped.

  11. “James Milonas, a Toronto-based real estate agent says, at the time, many buyers were desperate to get into the market at any cost. ‘Some people were spending a million dollars over asking,’ he said.

    Realtors who put their fiduciary duty to clients first and warned them that buying at the peak of the central bankers’ scamdemic-era housing bubble would be their financial Waterloo are now receiving thousands of warm thank-you cards from the would-be buyers who dodged a bullet.

    Oh, wait…”Now is not the time to buy,” said no realtor ever, anywhere.

  12. So some Canadians were bidding 1 million bucks over asking ? They’re not smart voters or house buyers……real kookoo , and deserve what they get …

    1. Watching the scamdemic-era FOMO lemmings get schlonged bigly is going to be a cautionary tale for a generation, not to mention, highly entertaining. Long buttered popcorn.

  13. ‘It kind of puts them on this hamster wheel’ – This is the ultimate goal of the evil banking cartel, to keep their serfs perpetually chained to the wheel of debt for maximum interest generation.

    1. Bullish Sign
      Exhausted Market Pros
      Safe-Haven ETFs
      Stock Movers Podcast
      Markets
      Morgan Stanley’s Wilson Warns US Stocks Not Yet in the Clear
      By Michael Msika
      May 12, 2025 at 2:17 AM PDT
      Takeaways NEW

      Sentiment toward the US stock market is improving but it’s too early for investors to sound the all-clear, according to Morgan Stanley strategists.

      The team led by Michael Wilson identified four factors needed to sustain a more durable rally, but saw progress in just two: “Optimism around a trade deal with China and stabilizing earnings revisions,” they wrote in a note on Monday.

      https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-05-12/morgan-stanley-s-wilson-says-stock-rebound-misses-all-clear

  14. Student loan collections resume, affecting millions in default

    The federal government has resumed sending student loan borrowers in default to collections, a process paused for five years due to the COVID-19 pandemic, potentially affecting millions of Americans’ finances.

    Persis Yu from the Student Borrower Protection Center said, “I hear all the time from older borrowers, in particular, who are worried about how they’re going to retire when student loan collections resume.”

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/loans/student-loan-collections-resume-affecting-millions-in-default/ar-AA1Edt2I

  15. N. Korean car smugglers face heavy losses as Chinese traders inflate prices

    Used car smugglers in Hyesan are growing increasingly frustrated over mounting debts caused by Chinese sellers charging excessive prices for vehicles.

    “Large cargo trucks carrying used cars have been arriving in Hyesan recently,” a Daily NK source in Ryanggang province said recently “However, more smugglers are taking losses because the Chinese dealers are demanding inflated prices for their vehicles.”

    According to the source, North Korean smugglers involved in state-sanctioned smuggling typically import used cars costing between 100,000 yuan ($15,600) and 200,000 yuan ($31,200) each, but end up selling them in North Korea for 20,000 yuan ($3,120) to 30,000 yuan ($4,680) less, frequently operating at a loss.

    One smuggler who imported a used car from China for 200,000 yuan ($31,200) last month was forced to sell it for just 175,000 yuan ($27,300), taking a 25,000 yuan ($3,900) hit. When the vehicle arrived, it was in such poor condition that no one would pay the full price, forcing him to cut his losses and sell it for significantly less.

    “The Chinese traders receive payment first and then purchase the vehicles, but they’re making outrageous profits by delivering cars in terrible condition,” the source said. “In the end, the Chinese traders pocket the profits while the smugglers who paid upfront take all the losses.”

    “With the Chinese taking so much money, car smugglers are frustrated and complaining that they can’t continue doing business while suffering such losses,” he added.

    Even when car smugglers want to work with new partners, they face significant bureaucratic hurdles because they need state permission.

    “Since car smuggling currently operates under state approval, you can only deal with Chinese traders who have been authorized by the government,” the source explained. “Smugglers can’t easily switch partners because it takes over a month for the state to approve a new trader.”

    Chinese dealers are well aware of this constraint and exploit it to maintain leverage over North Korean traders. “The problem is that the Chinese fully understand our situation and don’t hesitate to engage in unethical business practices,” the source said.

    “A Hyesan smuggler in his 40s complained that he can’t sleep at night, thinking it might be better to just quit since he’s losing tens of thousands of yuan due to Chinese traders charging absurdly high prices for cars—even though he won’t face consequences since it’s state-sanctioned smuggling,” the source revealed. “People are angry, but many smugglers feel helpless because there’s no solution to the problem.”

    https://www.dailynk.com/english/n-korean-car-smugglers-face-heavy-losses-as-chinese-traders-inflate-prices/

  16. Honduran nationals accused of $89M payroll scheme for illegal immigrants

    WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. (CBS12) — Four Honduran nationals were indicted in Florida for an off-the-books payroll system for undocumented construction workers.

    The scheme allowed them to avoid paying employment taxes to the IRS and defrauded workers’ compensation insurance companies, according to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).

    According to the DOJ news release, the defendants, Iris Villafranca, Mario Flores, Osman Zapata, and Cristofer Oseguera Giron, were booked for conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business and conspiracy to defraud the United States.

    Officials report Villafranca was also charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and filing false tax returns.

    The indictment says that from 2015 to 2022, the four Honduran nationals used shell companies to run an unlicensed check-cashing and cash courier business that cashed around $89 million in checks from construction subcontractors.

    The subcontractors pay their workers under the table in cash, and as a fee for their service, the defendants allegedly charge a percentage on top, according to the indictment.

    Officials say the defendants filed false tax documents to conceal the scheme.

    In another scheme to hide wrongdoing, the defendants also provided false information to insurers about the number of workers covered by the insurance and the amount workers were paid, according to the DOJ.

    https://cbs12.com/news/local/honduran-nationals-accused-of-89m-payroll-fraud-scheme-in-florida-construction-workers-may-11-2025

    A comment:

    ‘I’m waiting for when they uncover the same scheme with the housekeeper racket in Palm Beach County.’

  17. Wait a minute, I thought foreigners didn’t want to vacation in the US!

    Mexican Official Says Visa Revoked by Trump Administration

    The governor of Baja California announced on social media Sunday that the United States has revoked tourist visas for her and her husband.

    Marina del Pilar Ávila of Mexico’s ruling Morena party said they were informed of the consular action but did not disclose the reason behind the decision, which she attributed to the Trump administration.

    “I fully trust that the situation will be satisfactorily clarified for both of us,” Ávila wrote in a social-media post on X, formerly Twitter.

    Ávila’s husband, Carlos Torres Torres, also a member of the Morena party, was notified of the United States’ decision to revoke his visa.

    Oh my! Mexican MORENA apparatchiks can’t take the kids to Disney or Hawaii!

  18. ‘I’ve never been rejected for a loan in my life,’ said the 74-year-old retired Pennsylvania furniture store owner”

    Why in the heck does a 74 year old boomer (who lived thru the greatest asset price bubble in history) still have a mortgage and need a refinance???????

  19. ‘I don’t think that the price is what’s really stopping anyone anyway.

    Oh my sweet special child, it’s ALWAYS the price.
    If your precious little house isn’t selling, it’s priced too high. Period.

  20. A Mother Took Her Sons to an ICE Check-In. She Never Saw Them Again.

    Alma Lopez Diaz was sitting in a waiting room of 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan when an officer came out with one of her son’s wallets and another’s debit card.

    She had walked into the Immigration and Customs Enforcement office with her sons Josue, 19, an usher at the family’s church, and Jose, 20, a recent high-school graduate, to accompany them on a routine check-in with the authorities. She also brought her youngest son, Mateo, a nonverbal 8-year-old with Moebius syndrome, a neurological disorder, who has seizures and requires constant care.

    Yet at this check-in, the situation was different from in years past. An officer told Alma that Jose and Josue were now detained: “They are not going to be returning.”

    The check-in can be an easy way for the agency to juice deportation numbers, says Camille Mackler, the CEO of Immigrant ARC, a collaborative of legal-service providers in New York. She also notes that lawyers are seeing more immigrants without criminal histories being detained. “When they can deport, they’re deporting,” she says.

    “They’re becoming very aggressive with detaining individuals now,” says Ala Amoachi, the Trejo Lopez brothers’ attorney. Gone are the days when immigrants could mostly expect discretion from federal officials if they lived quiet lives. To make matters more chaotic, the detention decisions are being made “kind of arbitrarily,” she says, “like it really depends on when you check in, who’s the supervisor of the day. You may be picked up. You may not be. You may be given an ankle bracelet.”

    Last Tuesday, they were denied a stay of removal and their deportation was scheduled for that coming Friday, just two weeks shy of when Josue was supposed to attend his high-school graduation ceremony. “Don’t worry about your graduation,” an official talking to him about his mental health said. “Don’t worry about that stuff. Just put your mind to El Salvador. You’re not from here anymore.” Early the next morning, Alma was told that her sons were going to be removed that same day — her birthday.

    When they were finally released, a friend of the family, an older man, was waiting outside the airport and took them to his home. When we spoke a day later, they were still there and were not sure how long they would stay or what else they would do. “We don’t have another place or another family member that we could go,” says Jose, “because all our family is in the U.S.”

    They called their mother. At one point, Mateo picked up the phone, connected by video, and saw their faces. “He was literally happy for a minute and then he realized that something was not right,” says Josue. “He started crying.”

    The child’s horrified reaction has spread to the rest of the family. In Georgia, Alma set up a GoFundMe for her sons, “Stranded and Seeking Hope.” She says she can’t leave Mateo, a U.S. citizen, behind. That suggests a severed link to the older brothers. “I don’t know what would be the next time that I would be able to see them again,” she says. “It would probably have to be many years.”

    https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/alma-lopez-diaz-ice-deported-el-salvador.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *